Literature DB >> 11329494

Individual differences in responses to ethanol and d-amphetamine: a within-subject study.

L Holdstock1, H de Wit.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In some individuals, ethanol (EtOH) produces marked stimulant-like subjective effects resembling those of stimulant drugs, like d-amphetamine (AMP). In this study, we examined the neurochemical basis of these individual differences by examining the same subjects' responses to both EtOH and AMP. A positive correlation between subjects' responses to the two drugs may suggest that AMP and EtOH produce their stimulant-like subjective effects by a shared mechanism.
METHODS: Twenty-seven volunteers (17 male, 10 female), aged 21-35, received beverages or capsules containing EtOH 0.8 g/kg, AMP 10 or 20 mg, or placebo on four separate sessions in random order and under double-blind conditions. Various self-reported and objective drug effects were measured, including measures sensitive to subjective and cognitive stimulant-like effects.
RESULTS: EtOH and AMP produced their prototypical subjective and behavioral effects, including increased ratings of stimulant-like subjective effects, increased heart rate and blood pressure, and improved vigilance performance after AMP and increased ratings of sedative-like subjective effects, increased heart rate and blood pressure, and impaired vigilance performance after EtOH. Consistent with previous reports, there was substantial intersubject variability in subjective responses to EtOH: some subjects reported primarily stimulant-like effects, whereas others reported primarily sedative-like effects. To examine the relationship between these responses to EtOH and subjects' responses to AMP, correlations were examined between effects of EtOH and AMP. For all subjects together, there was a significant positive correlation between responses to EtOH and 20 mg AMP on the ARCI A scale (a measure of stimulant-like subjective effects; r = 0.41, p < 0.05). Among only those subjects who reported primarily stimulant-like effects from EtOH, the correlation between EtOH and AMP was 0.64 (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Subjects who experience pronounced stimulant-like effects from EtOH also report greater stimulant effects from AMP, suggesting that these effects may be mediated through similar mechanisms. These correlations between the drugs' effects were not observed on other measures, such as DSST or vigilance task performance or heart rate. This may indicate that these other effects are mediated by separate mechanisms. The study illustrates a novel approach to studying the neurochemical basis of drug effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11329494

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res        ISSN: 0145-6008            Impact factor:   3.455


  26 in total

1.  Caffeine choice prospectively predicts positive subjective effects of caffeine and d-amphetamine.

Authors:  Stacey C Sigmon; Roland R Griffiths
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2011-05-19       Impact factor: 4.492

Review 2.  Genetic factors modulating the response to stimulant drugs in humans.

Authors:  Amy B Hart; Harriet de Wit; Abraham A Palmer
Journal:  Curr Top Behav Neurosci       Date:  2012

3.  Stability of acute responses to drugs in humans across repeated testing: Findings with alcohol and amphetamine.

Authors:  Conor H Murray; Jessica Weafer; Harriet de Wit
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2020-04-25       Impact factor: 4.492

4.  Determining the subjective and physiological effects of BZP on human females.

Authors:  Joanne C Lin; Nisha Bangs; Heeseung Lee; Rob R Kydd; Bruce R Russell
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2009-09-24       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  Individual variability and predictors of driving simulator impairment in patients with obstructive sleep apnea.

Authors:  Andrew Vakulin; Peter G Catcheside; Stuart D Baulk; Nick A Antic; Siobhan Banks; Jillian Dorrian; R Doug McEvoy
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2014-06-15       Impact factor: 4.062

6.  The amphetamine response moderates the relationship between negative emotionality and alcohol use.

Authors:  Kenneth J D Allen; Frances H Gabbay
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2012-12-14       Impact factor: 3.455

7.  Preliminary data on the association among the serotonin transporter polymorphism, subjective alcohol experiences, and drinking behavior.

Authors:  William R Corbin; Kim Fromme; Susan E Bergeson
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol       Date:  2006-01

8.  In the company of others: social factors alter acute alcohol effects.

Authors:  Matthew G Kirkpatrick; Harriet de Wit
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 9.  Neurocognitive enhancement or impairment? A systematic meta-analysis of prescription stimulant effects on processing speed, decision-making, planning, and cognitive perseveration.

Authors:  Marisa E Marraccini; Lisa L Weyandt; Joseph S Rossi; Bergljot Gyda Gudmundsdottir
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 3.157

Review 10.  Motivational systems in adolescence: possible implications for age differences in substance abuse and other risk-taking behaviors.

Authors:  Tamara L Doremus-Fitzwater; Elena I Varlinskaya; Linda P Spear
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 2.310

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.