Literature DB >> 23239553

Maternal perspectives on the return of genetic results: context matters.

Kimberley D Lakes1, Elaine Vaughan, Amy Lemke, Marissa Jones, Timothy Wigal, Dean Baker, James M Swanson, Wylie Burke.   

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to study maternal preferences for the return of their child's genetic results and to describe the experiences, perceptions, attitudes, and values that are brought to bear when individuals from different racial and cultural backgrounds consider participating in genetic research. We recruited women with diverse sociodemographic profiles to participate in seven focus groups. Twenty-eight percent of participants self-identified as Hispanic; 49% as White, non-Hispanic; and 21% as Asian or Asian American. Focus groups were conducted in English or Spanish and were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Transcripts were analyzed using qualitative thematic methods. Results indicated that preferences and decisions regarding the return of results may depend on both research and individual contextual factors. Participants understood the return of results as a complex issue, where individual and cultural differences in preferences are certain to arise. Another key finding was that participants desired an interpersonal, dynamic, flexible process that accommodated individual preferences and contextual differences for returning results. Our findings indicate a need to have well-developed systems for allowing participants to make and change over time their choices regarding the return of their child's genetic results.
Copyright © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23239553      PMCID: PMC3535554          DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.35673

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med Genet A        ISSN: 1552-4825            Impact factor:   2.802


  39 in total

1.  Guidelines for the communication of Biomonitoring Equivalents: report from the Biomonitoring Equivalents Expert Workshop.

Authors:  Judy S LaKind; Lesa L Aylward; Conrad Brunk; Stephen DiZio; Michael Dourson; Daniel A Goldstein; Michael E Kilpatrick; Daniel Krewski; Michael J Bartels; Hugh A Barton; Peter J Boogaard; John Lipscomb; Kannan Krishnan; Monica Nordberg; Miles Okino; Yu-Mei Tan; Claude Viau; Janice W Yager; Sean M Hays
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2008-05-22       Impact factor: 3.271

2.  Public perspectives on returning genetics and genomics research results.

Authors:  J O'Daniel; S B Haga
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2011-05-07       Impact factor: 2.000

3.  Offering individual genetic research results: context matters.

Authors:  Laura M Beskow; Wylie Burke
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 17.956

4.  Personal genome research : what should the participant be told?

Authors:  Amy L McGuire; James R Lupski
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 11.639

Review 5.  Human genome sequencing in health and disease.

Authors:  Claudia Gonzaga-Jauregui; James R Lupski; Richard A Gibbs
Journal:  Annu Rev Med       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 13.739

6.  Uncertainty and perceived personal control among parents of children with rare chromosome conditions: the role of genetic counseling.

Authors:  Shawn E Lipinski; Michael J Lipinski; Leslie G Biesecker; Barbara B Biesecker
Journal:  Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet       Date:  2006-11-15       Impact factor: 3.908

7.  Psychological impact of genetic testing for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Ellen R Gritz; Susan K Peterson; Sally W Vernon; Salma K Marani; Walter F Baile; Beatty G Watts; Christopher I Amos; Marsha L Frazier; Patrick M Lynch
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-03-20       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 8.  Child and adolescent psychiatric genetics.

Authors:  Johannes Hebebrand; Andre Scherag; Benno G Schimmelmann; Anke Hinney
Journal:  Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2010-02-06       Impact factor: 4.785

9.  Researcher practices on returning genetic research results.

Authors:  Christopher Heaney; Genevieve Tindall; Joe Lucas; Susanne B Haga
Journal:  Genet Test Mol Biomarkers       Date:  2010-10-12

Review 10.  Managing incidental findings in human subjects research: analysis and recommendations.

Authors:  Susan M Wolf; Frances P Lawrenz; Charles A Nelson; Jeffrey P Kahn; Mildred K Cho; Ellen Wright Clayton; Joel G Fletcher; Michael K Georgieff; Dale Hammerschmidt; Kathy Hudson; Judy Illes; Vivek Kapur; Moira A Keane; Barbara A Koenig; Bonnie S Leroy; Elizabeth G McFarland; Jordan Paradise; Lisa S Parker; Sharon F Terry; Brian Van Ness; Benjamin S Wilfond
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.718

View more
  9 in total

1.  Community member and faith leader perspectives on the process of building trusting relationships between communities and researchers.

Authors:  Kimberley D Lakes; Elaine Vaughan; Jennifer Pham; Tuyet Tran; Marissa Jones; Dean Baker; James M Swanson; Ellen Olshansky
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 4.689

2.  How Much Control Do Children and Adolescents Have over Genomic Testing, Parental Access to Their Results, and Parental Communication of Those Results to Others?

Authors:  Ellen Wright Clayton
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 1.718

3.  Return of results: ethical and legal distinctions between research and clinical care.

Authors:  Wylie Burke; Barbara J Evans; Gail P Jarvik
Journal:  Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet       Date:  2014-03-10       Impact factor: 3.908

4.  Psychological Impact of Learning CDKN2A Variant Status as a Genetic Research Result.

Authors:  Xuan Zhu; Emma R Leof; Kari G Rabe; Jennifer B McCormick; Gloria M Petersen; Carmen Radecki Breitkopf
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2019-04-18       Impact factor: 2.000

5.  Ethical Issues in Newborn Sequencing Research: The Case Study of BabySeq.

Authors:  Lainie Friedman Ross; Ellen Wright Clayton
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2019-11-12       Impact factor: 7.124

6.  Teenagers and Precision Psychiatry: A Window of Opportunity.

Authors:  Maya Sabatello; Ying Chen; Carmen Fiorella Herrera; Erika Brockhoff; Jehannine Austin; Paul S Appelbaum
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2021-01-27       Impact factor: 2.000

7.  Expectation versus Reality: The Impact of Utility on Emotional Outcomes after Returning Individualized Genetic Research Results in Pediatric Rare Disease Research, a Qualitative Interview Study.

Authors:  Cara N Cacioppo; Ariel E Chandler; Meghan C Towne; Alan H Beggs; Ingrid A Holm
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-15       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Barriers and facilitators to dissemination and adoption of precision medicine among Hispanics/Latinos.

Authors:  Juan R Canedo; Consuelo H Wilkins; Nicole Senft; Araceli Romero; Kemberlee Bonnet; David Schlundt
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 3.295

9.  The role of race and ethnicity in views toward and participation in genetic studies and precision medicine research in the United States: A systematic review of qualitative and quantitative studies.

Authors:  Elena R Fisher; Rebekah Pratt; Riley Esch; Megan Kocher; Katie Wilson; Whiwon Lee; Heather A Zierhut
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomic Med       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 2.183

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.