PURPOSE: Respiratory gating is an established approach to overcoming respiration-induced image artefacts in PET. Of special interest in this respect are raw PET data-driven gating methods which do not require additional hardware to acquire respiratory signals during the scan. However, these methods rely heavily on the quality of the acquired PET data (statistical properties, data contrast, etc.). We therefore combined external radioactive markers with data-driven respiratory gating in PET/CT. The feasibility and accuracy of this approach was studied for [(18)F]FDG PET/CT imaging in patients with malignant liver and lung lesions. METHODS: PET data from 30 patients with abdominal or thoracic [(18)F]FDG-positive lesions (primary tumours or metastases) were included in this prospective study. The patients underwent a 10-min list-mode PET scan with a single bed position following a standard clinical whole-body [(18)F]FDG PET/CT scan. During this scan, one to three radioactive point sources (either (22)Na or (18)F, 50-100 kBq) in a dedicated holder were attached the patient's abdomen. The list mode data acquired were retrospectively analysed for respiratory signals using established data-driven gating approaches and additionally by tracking the motion of the point sources in sinogram space. Gated reconstructions were examined qualitatively, in terms of the amount of respiratory displacement and in respect of changes in local image intensity in the gated images. RESULTS: The presence of the external markers did not affect whole-body PET/CT image quality. Tracking of the markers led to characteristic respiratory curves in all patients. Applying these curves for gated reconstructions resulted in images in which motion was well resolved. Quantitatively, the performance of the external marker-based approach was similar to that of the best intrinsic data-driven methods. Overall, the gain in measured tumour uptake from the nongated to the gated images indicating successful removal of respiratory motion was correlated with the magnitude of the respiratory displacement of the respective tumour lesion, but not with lesion size. CONCLUSION: Respiratory information can be assessed from list-mode PET/CT through PET data-derived tracking of external radioactive markers. This information can be successfully applied to respiratory gating to reduce motion-related image blurring. In contrast to other previously described PET data-driven approaches, the external marker approach is independent of tumour uptake and thereby applicable even in patients with poor uptake and small tumours.
PURPOSE: Respiratory gating is an established approach to overcoming respiration-induced image artefacts in PET. Of special interest in this respect are raw PET data-driven gating methods which do not require additional hardware to acquire respiratory signals during the scan. However, these methods rely heavily on the quality of the acquired PET data (statistical properties, data contrast, etc.). We therefore combined external radioactive markers with data-driven respiratory gating in PET/CT. The feasibility and accuracy of this approach was studied for [(18)F]FDG PET/CT imaging in patients with malignant liver and lung lesions. METHODS: PET data from 30 patients with abdominal or thoracic [(18)F]FDG-positive lesions (primary tumours or metastases) were included in this prospective study. The patients underwent a 10-min list-mode PET scan with a single bed position following a standard clinical whole-body [(18)F]FDG PET/CT scan. During this scan, one to three radioactive point sources (either (22)Na or (18)F, 50-100 kBq) in a dedicated holder were attached the patient's abdomen. The list mode data acquired were retrospectively analysed for respiratory signals using established data-driven gating approaches and additionally by tracking the motion of the point sources in sinogram space. Gated reconstructions were examined qualitatively, in terms of the amount of respiratory displacement and in respect of changes in local image intensity in the gated images. RESULTS: The presence of the external markers did not affect whole-body PET/CT image quality. Tracking of the markers led to characteristic respiratory curves in all patients. Applying these curves for gated reconstructions resulted in images in which motion was well resolved. Quantitatively, the performance of the external marker-based approach was similar to that of the best intrinsic data-driven methods. Overall, the gain in measured tumour uptake from the nongated to the gated images indicating successful removal of respiratory motion was correlated with the magnitude of the respiratory displacement of the respective tumour lesion, but not with lesion size. CONCLUSION: Respiratory information can be assessed from list-mode PET/CT through PET data-derived tracking of external radioactive markers. This information can be successfully applied to respiratory gating to reduce motion-related image blurring. In contrast to other previously described PET data-driven approaches, the external marker approach is independent of tumour uptake and thereby applicable even in patients with poor uptake and small tumours.
Authors: Sadek A Nehmeh; Yusuf E Erdi; Kenneth E Rosenzweig; Heiko Schoder; Steve M Larson; Olivia D Squire; John L Humm Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2003-10 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Norbert Lang; Mohammad Dawood; Florian Büther; Otmar Schober; Michael Schäfers; Klaus Schäfers Journal: Z Med Phys Date: 2006 Impact factor: 4.820
Authors: Wouter van Elmpt; James Hamill; Judson Jones; Dirk De Ruysscher; Philippe Lambin; Michel Ollers Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2011-01-11 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Florian Büther; Iris Ernst; Mohammad Dawood; Peter Kraxner; Michael Schäfers; Otmar Schober; Klaus P Schäfers Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2010-07-06 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Paul K R Dasari; Mohammed Salman Shazeeb; Arda Könik; Clifford Lindsay; Joyeeta M Mukherjee; Karen L Johnson; Michael A King Journal: Med Phys Date: 2014-11 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Luciana Erthal; Fernanda Erthal; Rob S B Beanlands; Terrence D Ruddy; Robert A deKemp; Girish Dwivedi Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2016-08-12 Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: Guang Li; C Ross Schmidtlein; Irene A Burger; Carole A Ridge; Stephen B Solomon; John L Humm Journal: Med Phys Date: 2014-09 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Ali Asgar Attarwala; Flavia Molina-Duran; Karen-Anett Büsing; Stefan O Schönberg; Dale L Bailey; Kathy Willowson; Gerhard Glatting Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-11-04 Impact factor: 3.240