Literature DB >> 23233273

Clinicopathological characteristics and survival difference between gastric stump carcinoma and primary upper third gastric cancer.

Masanori Tokunaga1, Takeshi Sano, Shigekazu Ohyama, Naoki Hiki, Tetsu Fukunaga, Kazuhiko Yamada, Toshiharu Yamaguchi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The increased incidence of early gastric cancer in several Asian countries has been associated with an increase in gastric stump carcinoma (GSC) following gastric cancer surgery. The clinicopathological characteristics of GSC remain unclear because of the limited number of patients with GSC.
METHODS: The clinicopathological characteristics, including the 5-year survival rate of patients with GSC following distal gastrectomy (167 patients), were compared with those of patients with primary upper third gastric cancer (PGC; 755 patients). The clinicopathological characteristics of patients with GSC were also compared between those who had initial surgery for gastric cancer (GSC-M group, 78 patients) and for benign lesions (GSC-B group, 89 patients).
RESULTS: The GSC-B group has a greater male/female ratio (13.8 vs. 3.1) and a longer interval between initial gastrectomy and surgery for GSC (31.0 vs. 9.4 years) than the GSC-M group. The 5-year survival rate was not significantly different between the GSC-B group (49.0 %) and the GSC-M group (59.3 %, P = 0.359). A comparison between the GSC group and the PGC group revealed a poorer 5-year survival rate for the GSC group (53.6 %) than the PGC group (78.3 %, P < 0.001), and the same trend was observed even after stratification by the pathological stage.
CONCLUSIONS: Stump carcinoma arises earlier following gastrectomy for malignant disease than for benign disease. The prognosis was poor in patients with GSC compared to those with PGC. Early detection of GSC is necessary and an appropriate follow-up program should be established.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23233273     DOI: 10.1007/s11605-012-2114-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  29 in total

1.  Clinicopathologic differences between gastric remnant cancer and primary cancer in the upper third of the stomach.

Authors:  T Imada; Y Rino; M Takahashi; M Shiozawa; S Hatori; Y Noguchi; T Amano; O Kobayashi; M Sairenji; H Motohashi
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  1998 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.480

2.  Cancer of the gastric stump: analyses of 819 patients and comparison with other stomach cancer patients.

Authors:  A Viste; G E Eide; E Glattre; O Søreide
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Risk factors for metachronous gastric cancer in the remnant stomach after early cancer surgery.

Authors:  Isao Nozaki; Junichirou Nasu; Yoshiro Kubo; Minoru Tanada; Rieko Nishimura; Akira Kurita
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Cancer of the gastric stump following distal gastrectomy for cancer.

Authors:  M Ohashi; H Katai; T Fukagawa; T Gotoda; T Sano; M Sasako
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  Gastric cancer treated in 1991 in Japan: data analysis of nationwide registry.

Authors:  Keiichi Maruyama; Michio Kaminishi; Ken-Ichi Hayashi; Yoh Isobe; Ichiro Honda; Hitoshi Katai; Kuniyoshi Arai; Yasuhiro Kodera; Atsushi Nashimoto
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 7.370

6.  Comparative study of the pathological characteristics of gastric stump carcinoma and carcinoma of the upper third of the stomach.

Authors:  Igor Rabin; Andronik Kapiev; Bar Chikman; Zvi Halpern; Natan Poluksht; Ilan Wassermann; Judith Sandbank; Ariel Halevy
Journal:  Isr Med Assoc J       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 0.892

7.  Treatment and outcome of patients with gastric remnant cancer after resection for peptic ulcer disease.

Authors:  James J Mezhir; Mithat Gonen; John B Ammori; Vivian E Strong; Murray F Brennan; Daniel G Coit
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  Relationship between the histological type of initial lesions and the risk for the development of remnant gastric cancers after gastrectomy for synchronous multiple gastric cancers.

Authors:  Takeo Fujita; Naoto Gotohda; Shinichiro Takahashi; Toshio Nakagohri; Masaru Konishi; Taira Kinoshita
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  The outcome of patients with remnant primary gastric cancer compared with those having upper one-third gastric cancer.

Authors:  Ji Yeong An; Min-Gew Choi; Jae Hyung Noh; Tae Sung Sohn; Sung Kim
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.565

10.  Clinicopathological features of multiple primary gastric carcinoma.

Authors:  M Kodama; G E Tur; N Shiozawa; K Koyama
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 3.454

View more
  18 in total

1.  Late phase II study of robot-assisted gastrectomy with nodal dissection for clinical stage I gastric cancer.

Authors:  Masanori Tokunaga; Rie Makuuchi; Yuiciro Miki; Yutaka Tanizawa; Etsuro Bando; Taiichi Kawamura; Masanori Terashima
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Effects of initial disease status on lymph flow following gastrectomy in cases of carcinoma in the remnant stomach.

Authors:  Shinsaku Honda; Etsuro Bando; Rie Makuuchi; Masanori Tokunaga; Yutaka Tanizawa; Taiichi Kawamura; Teiichi Sugiura; Yusuke Kinugasa; Katsuhiko Uesaka; Masanori Terashima
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2016-09-16       Impact factor: 7.370

3.  Use of Body Mass Index to Predict the Prognosis of Patients with Remnant Gastric Cancer.

Authors:  Tomoyuki Matsunaga; Hiroaki Saito; Tomohiro Osaki; Yusuke Kono; Yuki Murakami; Hirohiko Kuroda; Yoji Fukumoto; Yoshiyuki Fujiwara
Journal:  Yonago Acta Med       Date:  2017-06-26       Impact factor: 1.641

4.  Prognostic factors and survival in patients with gastric stump cancer.

Authors:  Hua Huang; Wei Wang; Zhong Chen; Jie-Jie Jin; Zi-Wen Long; Hong Cai; Xiao-Wen Liu; Ye Zhou; Ya-Nong Wang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-02-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 5.  Current status in remnant gastric cancer after distal gastrectomy.

Authors:  Masaichi Ohira; Takahiro Toyokawa; Katsunobu Sakurai; Naoshi Kubo; Hiroaki Tanaka; Kazuya Muguruma; Masakazu Yashiro; Naoyoshi Onoda; Kosei Hirakawa
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-02-28       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Hand-assisted laparoscopic versus open radical resection of gastric remnant cancer: a clinical comparison.

Authors:  Guo-De Luo; Bao-Hua Chen; Yong-Kuan Cao; Jia-Qing Gong; Shan-Hong Tang; Yun-Ming Li
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-11-15

7.  A Caliber Persistent Artery (Dieulafoy's Lesion) which is Associated with an Early-Stage Gastric Stump Cancer Following a Distal Gastrectomy.

Authors:  Simona Gurzu; Constantin Copotoiu; Leonard Azamfirei; Ioan Jung
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2013-08-01

Review 8.  Does remnant gastric cancer really differ from primary gastric cancer? A systematic review of the literature by the Task Force of Japanese Gastric Cancer Association.

Authors:  Hideaki Shimada; Takeo Fukagawa; Yoshio Haga; Koji Oba
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 7.370

9.  Is there difference between anastomotic site and remnant stump carcinoma in gastric stump cancers?-a single institute analysis of 90 patients.

Authors:  Ramachandra Chowdappa; Ajeet Ramamani Tiwari; Namrata Ranganath; Rekha V Kumar
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2019-04

10.  Gastric stump cancer: more than just another proximal gastric cancer and demanding a more suitable TNM staging system.

Authors:  André Costa-Pinho; J Pinto-de-Sousa; José Barbosa; J Costa-Maia
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-09-16       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.