Literature DB >> 17618792

The outcome of patients with remnant primary gastric cancer compared with those having upper one-third gastric cancer.

Ji Yeong An1, Min-Gew Choi, Jae Hyung Noh, Tae Sung Sohn, Sung Kim.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although the prognosis for patients with remnant gastric cancer has been considered to be poor, few reports exist concerning outcomes of these patients. The objective of this study was to evaluate clinicopathologic features and prognostic outcomes of patients with remnant primary gastric cancer compared with the same findings for patients with upper-one third cancer of the stomach.
METHODS: Thirty-eight patients with remnant primary gastric cancer and 794 patients with primary upper one-third cancer who underwent surgery at Samsung Medical Center between 1995 and 2004 were enrolled in this study. Clinicopathologic characteristics, tumor stages, and survival times were analyzed.
RESULTS: The mean interval between previous gastrectomy and diagnosis of remnant primary gastric cancer was 18.8 years for patients who had undergone their first gastrectomy for malignant disease (n = 13) and 28.6 years for patients with benign disease (n = 25). Patients with remnant primary gastric cancer showed a greater male predominance compared with patients having upper one-third cancer (92.1% vs 65.5%, respectively, P = .001). Patient distribution according to operative curability, tumor size, stage, and histology showed no significant differences between the 2 groups. Overall 5-year survival rates of patients with remnant primary gastric cancer and those with upper one-third cancer were 53.7% and 62.9% (P = .346), respectively. Differences in the 5-year survival rates at each stage between the groups were not statistically significant.
CONCLUSIONS: Operative curability, tumor stages, and prognoses of patients with remnant primary gastric cancer are similar to those having upper one-third cancer. Early diagnosis and an aggressive surgical approach may be important to achieve better outcomes for patients with remnant primary gastric cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17618792     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.10.034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  15 in total

1.  Prognosis and clinicopathologic features in patients with gastric stump cancer after curative surgery.

Authors:  C Y Kung; W L Fang; R F Wang; C A Liu; A F Y Li; C W Wu; Y M Shyr; S C Chou; K H Huang
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 3.677

2.  Outcomes after completion total gastrectomy for gastric remnant cancer: experience from a Canadian tertiary centre.

Authors:  Etienne St-Louis; Stephen Donald Gowing; Pedram Mossallanejad; Mara Laura Leimanis; Carmen Mueller; Lorenzo Edwin Ferri
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 2.089

3.  Differences of the lymphatic distribution and surgical outcomes between remnant gastric cancers and primary proximal gastric cancers.

Authors:  Shuhei Komatsu; Daisuke Ichikawa; Kazuma Okamoto; Daito Ikoma; Masahiro Tsujiura; Atsushi Shiozaki; Hitoshi Fujiwara; Yasutoshi Murayama; Yoshiaki Kuriu; Hisashi Ikoma; Masayoshi Nakanishi; Toshiya Ochiai; Yukihito Kokuba; Eigo Otsuji
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-01-04       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Prognostic factors and survival in patients with gastric stump cancer.

Authors:  Hua Huang; Wei Wang; Zhong Chen; Jie-Jie Jin; Zi-Wen Long; Hong Cai; Xiao-Wen Liu; Ye Zhou; Ya-Nong Wang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-02-14       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Endoscopic submucosal dissection for metachronous tumor in the remnant stomach after distal gastrectomy.

Authors:  Jong Yeul Lee; Il Ju Choi; Soo-Jeong Cho; Chan Gyoo Kim; Myeong-Cherl Kook; Jun Ho Lee; Keun Won Ryu; Young-Woo Kim
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-12-09       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Clinicopathological characteristics and survival difference between gastric stump carcinoma and primary upper third gastric cancer.

Authors:  Masanori Tokunaga; Takeshi Sano; Shigekazu Ohyama; Naoki Hiki; Tetsu Fukunaga; Kazuhiko Yamada; Toshiharu Yamaguchi
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 7.  Current status in remnant gastric cancer after distal gastrectomy.

Authors:  Masaichi Ohira; Takahiro Toyokawa; Katsunobu Sakurai; Naoshi Kubo; Hiroaki Tanaka; Kazuya Muguruma; Masakazu Yashiro; Naoyoshi Onoda; Kosei Hirakawa
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-02-28       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Gastric remnant cancer: an old problem with novel concerns.

Authors:  Ozgur Firat; Adem Guler; Murat Sozbilen; Sinan Ersin; Hasan Kaplan
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2008-07-08       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 9.  Does remnant gastric cancer really differ from primary gastric cancer? A systematic review of the literature by the Task Force of Japanese Gastric Cancer Association.

Authors:  Hideaki Shimada; Takeo Fukagawa; Yoshio Haga; Koji Oba
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 7.370

10.  Clinical significance of tumor location in remnant gastric cancers developed after partial gastrectomy for primary gastric cancer.

Authors:  Ji Yeong An; Ho Geun Youn; Tae Kyung Ha; Min Gew Choi; Kyoung-Mee Kim; Jae Hyung Noh; Tae Sung Sohn; Sung Kim
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2007-12-13       Impact factor: 3.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.