Literature DB >> 31032099

Is there difference between anastomotic site and remnant stump carcinoma in gastric stump cancers?-a single institute analysis of 90 patients.

Ramachandra Chowdappa1, Ajeet Ramamani Tiwari1, Namrata Ranganath2, Rekha V Kumar3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Little has been reported regarding differences between malignancies that develop at the anastomotic site (ASC) and those that develop at the remnant stump (RSC) in gastric stump carcinomas (GSC). The purpose of our study was to compare clinical, pathological and survival characteristics of ASC patients with those of RSC patients.
METHODS: Patients who underwent surgery for GSC between January 2005 and December 2017 were analyzed. Of the total 112 patients, 22 patients were excluded from the study due to extensive loss of data. Ninety patients underwent curative resection and were evaluated based on anatomic site at which they developed malignancy, i.e., ASC and RSC. Clinical, pathological and survival characteristics were assessed.
RESULTS: As per Lauren's classification, diffuse and intestinal variety were significantly associated with ASC (P=0.0001) and RSC (P=0.0001) respectively. RSC was associated with lower pT [pT2, 15/33 (45.5%), P=0.0002]. ASC was significantly associated with higher pN [pN3, 30/57 (52.6%), P=0.0013], stage [stage III, 48/57 (84.2%), P=0.0022], positive mesenteric nodes (P=0.006) and poor 3-year survival (10.5% versus 36.4%, P=0.003).
CONCLUSIONS: ASC is substantially different than RSC. ASC is more aggressive disease compared to RSC and has different pathophysiology, higher rates of nodal involvement (both primary and mesenteric), presents with higher stage and has significantly poor 3-year survival.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gastric stump carcinoma (GSC); anastomotic site cancer; remnant stump cancer

Year:  2019        PMID: 31032099      PMCID: PMC6465485          DOI: 10.21037/jgo.2018.12.03

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol        ISSN: 2078-6891


  21 in total

1.  Post-gastric surgery: is a closer follow up required?

Authors:  V Balraj; B Perakath
Journal:  Natl Med J India       Date:  2001 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 0.537

2.  [Gastric stump carcinoma].

Authors:  D VAJDA; E NAGY; G MOLNAR
Journal:  Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Nuklearmed       Date:  1960-06

3.  FACTORS INFLUENCING THE LIFE EXPECTANCY OF PATIENTS OPERATED ON FOR GASTRIC ULCER.

Authors:  D C Balfour
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1922-09       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Gastric stump cancer after distal gastrectomy for benign disease: clinicopathological features and surgical outcomes.

Authors:  Alberto Di Leo; Corrado Pedrazzani; Maria Bencivenga; Arianna Coniglio; Fausto Rosa; Paolo Morgani; Daniele Marrelli; Alberto Marchet; Luca Cozzaglio; Simone Giacopuzzi; Guido Alberto Massimo Tiberio; Giovanni Battista Doglietto; Giovanni Vittimberga; Franco Roviello; Francesco Ricci
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-03-18       Impact factor: 5.344

5.  Clinicopathological characteristics and survival difference between gastric stump carcinoma and primary upper third gastric cancer.

Authors:  Masanori Tokunaga; Takeshi Sano; Shigekazu Ohyama; Naoki Hiki; Tetsu Fukunaga; Kazuhiko Yamada; Toshiharu Yamaguchi
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Prognostic factors in gastric stump carcinoma.

Authors:  S Thorban; K Böttcher; M Etter; J D Roder; R Busch; J R Siewert
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Comparative study of the pathological characteristics of gastric stump carcinoma and carcinoma of the upper third of the stomach.

Authors:  Igor Rabin; Andronik Kapiev; Bar Chikman; Zvi Halpern; Natan Poluksht; Ilan Wassermann; Judith Sandbank; Ariel Halevy
Journal:  Isr Med Assoc J       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 0.892

Review 8.  Gastric cancer arising from the remnant stomach after distal gastrectomy: a review.

Authors:  Shinsuke Takeno; Tatsuya Hashimoto; Kenji Maki; Ryosuke Shibata; Hironari Shiwaku; Ippei Yamana; Risako Yamashita; Yuichi Yamashita
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 9.  Gastric stump carcinoma - epidemiology and current concepts in pathogenesis and treatment.

Authors:  C Sinning; N Schaefer; J Standop; A Hirner; M Wolff
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2006-10-30       Impact factor: 4.424

10.  Gastric stump carcinoma after distal subtotal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer: experience of 541 patients with long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Paolo Morgagni; Andrea Gardini; Daniele Marrelli; Giovanni Vittimberga; Alberto Marchet; Giovanni de Manzoni; Maria Antonietta Di Cosmo; Gian Maria Rossi; Domenico Garcea; Franco Roviello
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 2.565

View more
  2 in total

1.  Meta-Analysis Reveals the Prognostic Relevance of Nuclear and Membrane-Associated Bile Acid Receptors in Gastric Cancer.

Authors:  Michael Rohr; Jihad Aljabban; Trina Rudeski-Rohr; Spencer Lessans; Sai Preethi Nakkina; Dexter Hadley; Xiang Zhu; Deborah A Altomare
Journal:  Clin Transl Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 4.488

2.  Remnant gastric cancer: An ordinary primary adenocarcinoma or a tumor with its own pattern?

Authors:  Marcus Fernando Kodama Pertille Ramos; Marina Alessandra Pereira; Andre Roncon Dias; Anna Carolina Batista Dantas; Daniel Jose Szor; Ulysses Ribeiro; Bruno Zilberstein; Ivan Cecconello
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2021-04-27
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.