Literature DB >> 23230851

Does cognitive ability influence responses to the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale?

Ian J Deary1, Roger Watson, Tom Booth, Catharine R Gale.   

Abstract

It has been suggested that how individuals respond to self-report items relies on cognitive processing. We hypothesized that an individual's level of cognitive ability may influence these processes such that, if there is a hierarchy of items within a particular questionnaire, as demonstrated by Mokken scaling, the strength of that hierarchy will vary according to cognitive ability. Using data on 8,643 men and women from the National Child Development Survey (1958 birth cohort; Power, & Elliott, 2006), we investigated, using Mokken scaling, whether the 14 items that make up the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale (Tennant et al., 2007)-completed when the participants were 50 years of age-form a hierarchy and whether that hierarchy varied according to cognitive ability at age 11 years. Among the sample as a whole, we found a moderately strong unidimensional hierarchy of items (Loevinger's coefficient [H] = 0.48). We split participants into 3 groups according to cognitive ability and analyzed the Mokken scaling properties of each group. Only the medium and high cognitive ability groups had acceptable (≥ 0.3) invariant item ordering (assessed using the HT statistic). This pattern was also found when the 3 cognitive ability groups were assessed within men and women separately. Greater attention should be paid to the content validity of questionnaires to ensure they are applicable across the spectrum of mental ability. PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2013 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23230851      PMCID: PMC3744814          DOI: 10.1037/a0030834

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Assess        ISSN: 1040-3590


  12 in total

1.  Escapable conclusions: Toomela (2003) and the universality of trait structure.

Authors:  Jüri Allik; Robert R McCrae
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2004-08

2.  Analyzing psychopathology items: a case for nonparametric item response theory modeling.

Authors:  Rob R Meijer; Joost J Baneke
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2004-09

3.  Cohort profile: 1958 British birth cohort (National Child Development Study).

Authors:  Chris Power; Jane Elliott
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2005-09-09       Impact factor: 7.196

4.  Can the 12-item General Health Questionnaire be used to measure positive mental health?

Authors:  Yongjian Hu; Sarah Stewart-Brown; Liz Twigg; Scott Weich
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2007-02-05       Impact factor: 7.723

5.  Do personality scale items function differently in people with high and low IQ?

Authors:  Chakadee Waiyavutti; Wendy Johnson; Ian J Deary
Journal:  Psychol Assess       Date:  2011-11-14

6.  The measurement equivalence of Big Five factor markers for persons with different levels of education.

Authors:  Beatrice Rammstedt; Lewis R Goldberg; Ingwer Borg
Journal:  J Res Pers       Date:  2010-02-01

7.  A hierarchy of distress: Mokken scaling of the GHQ-30.

Authors:  R Watson; I J Deary; B Shipley
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2008-01-29       Impact factor: 7.723

8.  Measuring quality of palliative care: psychometric properties of the FAMCARE Scale.

Authors:  Gerd Inger Ringdal; Marit S Jordhøy; Stein Kaasa
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.147

9.  Internal construct validity of the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS): a Rasch analysis using data from the Scottish Health Education Population Survey.

Authors:  Sarah Stewart-Brown; Alan Tennant; Ruth Tennant; Stephen Platt; Jane Parkinson; Scott Weich
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2009-02-19       Impact factor: 3.186

10.  The Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS): development and UK validation.

Authors:  Ruth Tennant; Louise Hiller; Ruth Fishwick; Stephen Platt; Stephen Joseph; Scott Weich; Jane Parkinson; Jenny Secker; Sarah Stewart-Brown
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2007-11-27       Impact factor: 3.186

View more
  3 in total

1.  From "aisle" to "labile": A hierarchical National Adult Reading Test scale revealed by Mokken scaling.

Authors:  Sarah McGrory; Elizabeth J Austin; Susan D Shenkin; John M Starr; Ian J Deary
Journal:  Psychol Assess       Date:  2015-08-10

2.  Factor structure and psychometric properties of a Polish adaptation of the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale.

Authors:  Karol Konaszewski; Małgorzata Niesiobędzka; Janusz Surzykiewicz
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 3.186

3.  What are the minimal sample size requirements for Mokken scaling? An empirical example with the Warwick- Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale.

Authors:  Roger Watson; Iris J L Egberink; Lisa Kirke; Jorge N Tendeiro; Frank Doyle
Journal:  Health Psychol Behav Med       Date:  2018-08-08
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.