Literature DB >> 17274855

Can the 12-item General Health Questionnaire be used to measure positive mental health?

Yongjian Hu1, Sarah Stewart-Brown, Liz Twigg, Scott Weich.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Well-being is an important determinant of health and social outcomes. Measures of positive mental health states are needed for population-based research. The 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) has been widely used in many settings and languages, and includes positively and negatively worded items. Our aim was to test the hypothesis that the GHQ-12 assesses both positive and negative mental health and that these domains are independent of one another.
METHOD: Exploratory (EFA) and confirmatory (CFA) factor analyses were conducted using data from the British Household Panel Survey (BHPS) and the Health Survey for England (HSE). Regression models were used to assess whether associations with individual and household characteristics varied across positive and negative mental health dimensions. We also explored higher-level variance in these measures, between electoral wards.
RESULTS: We found a consistent, replicable factor structure in both datasets. EFA results indicated a two-factor solution, and CFA demonstrated that this was superior to a one-factor model. These factors correspond to 'symptoms of mental disorder' and 'positive mental health'. Further analyses demonstrated independence of these factors in associations with age, gender, employment status, poor housing and household composition. Statistically significant ward-level variance was found for symptoms of mental disorder but not positive mental health.
CONCLUSIONS: The GHQ-12 measures both positive and negative aspects of mental health, and although correlated, these dimensions have some independence. The GHQ-12 could be used to measure positive mental health in population-based research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17274855     DOI: 10.1017/S0033291707009993

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Med        ISSN: 0033-2917            Impact factor:   7.723


  41 in total

1.  Age differences in the Big Five across the life span: evidence from two national samples.

Authors:  M Brent Donnellan; Richard E Lucas
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2008-09

2.  The development and validation of a general measure of well-being: the BBC well-being scale.

Authors:  P Kinderman; M Schwannauer; E Pontin; S Tai
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2011-01-18       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  A new look at social support: a theoretical perspective on thriving through relationships.

Authors:  Brooke C Feeney; Nancy L Collins
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Rev       Date:  2014-08-14

4.  Gender differences in the effects of childhood psychopathology and maternal distress on mental health in adult life.

Authors:  Eirini Flouri; Lars-Erik Malmberg
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2010-04-16       Impact factor: 4.328

5.  Late-life decline in well-being across adulthood in Germany, the United Kingdom, and the United States: Something is seriously wrong at the end of life.

Authors:  Denis Gerstorf; Nilam Ram; Guy Mayraz; Mira Hidajat; Ulman Lindenberger; Gert G Wagner; Jürgen Schupp
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2010-06

6.  Does cognitive ability influence responses to the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale?

Authors:  Ian J Deary; Roger Watson; Tom Booth; Catharine R Gale
Journal:  Psychol Assess       Date:  2012-12-10

7.  Psychological morbidity of farmers and non-farming population: results from a UK survey.

Authors:  Barry Hounsome; Rhiannon T Edwards; Natalia Hounsome; Gareth Edwards-Jones
Journal:  Community Ment Health J       Date:  2011-05-10

8.  Malnutrition in early life and adult mental health: evidence from a natural experiment.

Authors:  Cheng Huang; Michael R Phillips; Yali Zhang; Jingxuan Zhang; Qichang Shi; Zhiqiang Song; Zhijie Ding; Shutao Pang; Reynaldo Martorell
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 4.634

9.  The Everyday Feeling Questionnaire: the structure and validation of a measure of general psychological well-being and distress.

Authors:  Rudolf Uher; Robert Goodman
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2009-05-24       Impact factor: 4.328

10.  Internal construct validity of the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS): a Rasch analysis using data from the Scottish Health Education Population Survey.

Authors:  Sarah Stewart-Brown; Alan Tennant; Ruth Tennant; Stephen Platt; Jane Parkinson; Scott Weich
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2009-02-19       Impact factor: 3.186

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.