R Watson1, I J Deary, B Shipley. 1. School of Nursing and Midwifery, The University of Sheffield, UK. roger.watson@sheffield.ac.uk
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Hierarchical cumulative scales are common and informative in psychology. The General Health Questionnaire (GHQ) does not appear to have been subjected to an analysis that examines the hierarchical and cumulative nature of its items. We report an analysis of data from the 30-item GHQ (GHQ-30) as part of the Health and Lifestyle Survey (HALS). METHOD: Data from 6317 participants who completed the GHQ-30 as part of the HALS were analysed using the Mokken Scaling Procedure (MSP), which is a computer program that searches polychotomous data for hierarchical and cumulative scales on the basis of a range of diagnostic criteria. RESULTS: A final scale consisting of nine items from the GHQ-30 was obtained that, according to the criteria for a Mokken scale, was a reliable and very strong scale. The least difficult item in the scale is 'been (un)able to face up to your problems?' and the most difficult item is 'felt that life isn't worth living?' CONCLUSIONS: Items from the GHQ-30 form a short hierarchical and cumulative scale. The majority of these items also appear in the GHQ-12. The nine-item GHQ shows better distribution properties than the GHQ-30 and compares very favourably with the GHQ-12.
BACKGROUND: Hierarchical cumulative scales are common and informative in psychology. The General Health Questionnaire (GHQ) does not appear to have been subjected to an analysis that examines the hierarchical and cumulative nature of its items. We report an analysis of data from the 30-item GHQ (GHQ-30) as part of the Health and Lifestyle Survey (HALS). METHOD: Data from 6317 participants who completed the GHQ-30 as part of the HALS were analysed using the Mokken Scaling Procedure (MSP), which is a computer program that searches polychotomous data for hierarchical and cumulative scales on the basis of a range of diagnostic criteria. RESULTS: A final scale consisting of nine items from the GHQ-30 was obtained that, according to the criteria for a Mokken scale, was a reliable and very strong scale. The least difficult item in the scale is 'been (un)able to face up to your problems?' and the most difficult item is 'felt that life isn't worth living?' CONCLUSIONS: Items from the GHQ-30 form a short hierarchical and cumulative scale. The majority of these items also appear in the GHQ-12. The nine-item GHQ shows better distribution properties than the GHQ-30 and compares very favourably with the GHQ-12.
Authors: Joanna S Zeiger; Brett C Haberstick; Robin P Corley; Marissa A Ehringer; Thomas J Crowley; John K Hewitt; Christian J Hopfer; Michael C Stallings; Susan E Young; Soo Hyun Rhee Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2012-03-22 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Joanna S Zeiger; Brett C Haberstick; Robin P Corley; Marissa A Ehringer; Thomas J Crowley; John K Hewitt; Christian J Hopfer; Michael C Stallings; Susan E Young; Soo Hyun Rhee Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2010-02-09 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Charlotte Hanlon; Girmay Medhin; Atalay Alem; Mesfin Araya; Abdulreshid Abdulahi; Mark Tomlinson; Marcus Hughes; Vikram Patel; Michael Dewey; Martin Prince Journal: Br J Psychiatry Date: 2010-12 Impact factor: 9.319
Authors: D Gimeno; M Kivimäki; E J Brunner; M Elovainio; R De Vogli; A Steptoe; M Kumari; G D O Lowe; A Rumley; M G Marmot; J E Ferrie Journal: Psychol Med Date: 2008-06-04 Impact factor: 7.723
Authors: Muirne C S Paap; Danny Brouwer; Cees A W Glas; Evelyn M Monninkhof; Benjamin Forstreuter; Marcel E Pieterse; Job van der Palen Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2013-11-16 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Hermann Nabi; Jean-François Chastang; Thomas Lefèvre; Aline Dugravot; Maria Melchior; Michael G Marmot; Martin J Shipley; Mika Kivimäki; Archana Singh-Manoux Journal: Hypertension Date: 2011-02-21 Impact factor: 10.190