Literature DB >> 20401177

The measurement equivalence of Big Five factor markers for persons with different levels of education.

Beatrice Rammstedt1, Lewis R Goldberg, Ingwer Borg.   

Abstract

Previous findings suggest that the Big-Five factor structure is not guaranteed in samples with lower educational levels. The present study investigates the Big-Five factor structure in two large samples representative of the German adult population. In both samples, the Big-Five factor structure emerged only in a blurry way at lower educational levels, whereas for highly educated persons it emerged with textbook-like clarity. Because well-educated persons are most comparable to the usual subjects of psychological research, it might be asked if the Big Five are limited to such persons. Our data contradict this conclusion. There are strong individual differences in acquiescence response tendencies among less highly educated persons. After controlling for this bias the Big-Five model holds at all educational levels.

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 20401177      PMCID: PMC2854544          DOI: 10.1016/j.jrp.2009.10.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Res Pers        ISSN: 0092-6566


  9 in total

1.  A six-factor structure of personality-descriptive adjectives: solutions from psycholexical studies in seven languages.

Authors:  Michael C Ashton; Kibeom Lee; Marco Perugini; Piotr Szarota; Reinout E de Vries; Lisa Di Blas; Kathleen Boies; Boele De Raad
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2004-02

2.  Content and style in personality assessment.

Authors:  D N JACKSON; S MESSICK
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1958-07       Impact factor: 17.737

3.  Escapable conclusions: Toomela (2003) and the universality of trait structure.

Authors:  Jüri Allik; Robert R McCrae
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2004-08

4.  An alternative "description of personality": the big-five factor structure.

Authors:  L R Goldberg
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1990-12

5.  The developmental psychometrics of big five self-reports: acquiescence, factor structure, coherence, and differentiation from ages 10 to 20.

Authors:  Christopher J Soto; Oliver P John; Samuel D Gosling; Jeff Potter
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2008-04

6.  Los Cinco Grandes across cultures and ethnic groups: multitrait multimethod analyses of the Big Five in Spanish and English.

Authors:  V Benet-Martínez; O P John
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1998-09

7.  Response bias in surveys of mental health: an empirical investigation.

Authors:  W R Gove; M R Geerken
Journal:  AJS       Date:  1977-05

8.  When in doubt, say yes: acquiescence in interviews with mentally retarded persons.

Authors:  C K Sigelman; E C Budd; C L Spanhel; C J Schoenrock
Journal:  Ment Retard       Date:  1981-04

9.  Relationships between personality structure, structure of word meaning, and cognitive ability: a study of cultural mechanisms of personality.

Authors:  Aaro Toomela
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2003-10
  9 in total
  15 in total

1.  Personality factors in the Long Life Family Study.

Authors:  Stacy L Andersen; Jenny X Sun; Paola Sebastiani; Jaimie Huntly; Jesse D Gass; Lori Feldman; Harold Bae; Lene Christiansen; Thomas T Perls
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2012-12-28       Impact factor: 4.077

2.  Does cognitive ability influence responses to the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale?

Authors:  Ian J Deary; Roger Watson; Tom Booth; Catharine R Gale
Journal:  Psychol Assess       Date:  2012-12-10

3.  Short assessment of the Big Five: robust across survey methods except telephone interviewing.

Authors:  Frieder R Lang; Dennis John; Oliver Lüdtke; Jürgen Schupp; Gert G Wagner
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2011-06

4.  How universal is the Big Five? Testing the five-factor model of personality variation among forager-farmers in the Bolivian Amazon.

Authors:  Michael Gurven; Christopher von Rueden; Maxim Massenkoff; Hillard Kaplan; Marino Lero Vie
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2012-12-17

5.  Peeking into personality test answers: inter- and intraindividual variety in item interpretations.

Authors:  Grete Arro
Journal:  Integr Psychol Behav Sci       Date:  2013-03

6.  Explaining Variability in Response Style Traits: A Covariate-Adjusted IRTree.

Authors:  Allison J Ames; Aaron J Myers
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2020-11-04       Impact factor: 3.088

7.  Measuring single constructs by single items: Constructing an even shorter version of the "Short Five" personality inventory.

Authors:  Kenn Konstabel; Jan-Erik Lönnqvist; Sointu Leikas; Regina García Velázquez; Hiaying Qin; Markku Verkasalo; Gari Walkowitz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-11       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Challenges to capture the big five personality traits in non-WEIRD populations.

Authors:  Rachid Laajaj; Karen Macours; Daniel Alejandro Pinzon Hernandez; Omar Arias; Samuel D Gosling; Jeff Potter; Marta Rubio-Codina; Renos Vakis
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2019-07-10       Impact factor: 14.136

9.  Controlling for Response Biases in Self-Report Scales: Forced-Choice vs. Psychometric Modeling of Likert Items.

Authors:  Rodrigo Schames Kreitchmann; Francisco J Abad; Vicente Ponsoda; Maria Dolores Nieto; Daniel Morillo
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-10-15

10.  Random intercept EFA of personality scales.

Authors:  Julian Aichholzer
Journal:  J Res Pers       Date:  2014-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.