Literature DB >> 23230432

Evolution of genome base composition and genome size in bacteria.

Hiromi Nishida1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2012        PMID: 23230432      PMCID: PMC3515811          DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2012.00420

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Microbiol        ISSN: 1664-302X            Impact factor:   5.640


× No keyword cloud information.
In bacteria and archaea, genome size and guanine–cytosine (GC) content are correlated (Bentley and Parkhill, 2004; Musto et al., 2006; Mitchell, 2007; Suzuki et al., 2008; Guo et al., 2009). These parameters show greater correlation in bacteria (Pearson's correlation coefficient r = 0.46) than in archaea (r = 0.195) (Nishida, 2012a). The GC content in bacteria varies widely from 13.5% in “Candidatus Zinderia insecticola” (McCutcheon and Moran, 2010) to 74.9% in Anaeromyxobacter dehalogenans (Thomas et al., 2008). Although the GC content is similar among closely related bacteria, sometimes, the GC content is similar in phylogenetically distant bacteria. The distribution of GC content in bacterial genomes differs from a Gaussian distribution with multiple peaks. Bacterial chromosome organization is mediated by nucleoid-associated proteins (NAPs) (Wang et al., 2011). The specificity of NAP–DNA binding is determined by the differences in the GC content in specific regions of the DNA (Lucchini et al., 2006; Navarre et al., 2006; Castang et al., 2008; Smits and Grossman, 2010; Yun et al., 2010; Gordon et al., 2011). For example, the Salmonella NAP specifically binds to DNA regions with low GC content and inhibits expression of the genes present in these regions (Lucchini et al., 2006; Navarre et al., 2006). NAPs vary among bacteria (Ali et al., 2012). In addition, the NAP genes are located in the plasmid as well as in the chromosome, suggesting that these genes have been distributed via plasmids (Takeda et al., 2011). I hypothesize that the GC content distribution may be related to the variation in bacterial NAPs (Nishida, 2012b, 2013). However, the correlation between the genome size and GC content in bacteria is poorly understood. The obligate host-associated bacteria contain short genomes with low GC content (Mira et al., 2002; Moran, 2002; McCutcheon and Moran, 2012). Insertion sequence elements play an important role in the genome reduction of the host-associated bacteria (Song et al., 2010), whose small population size and asexual mode of reproduction lead to reduction of the genome size. In addition, deletion of the genes involved in DNA repair may contribute to a GC-poor genome (Moran et al., 2008). However, genome size reduction is not limited to the obligate host-associated bacteria (Nilsson et al., 2005). Generally, bacteria show a bias toward genomic deletions than insertions (Mira et al., 2001). Thus, bacteria must acquire additional genes to adapt to different environments. Some bacterial lineages, for example, Actinobacteria, have maintained long genomes with high GC content. Plasmids (and viruses) have played an important role in additional gene uptake into chromosomes (Davison, 1999; Sørensen et al., 2005; Harrison and Brockhurst, 2012). Occasionally, the plasmid DNA gets integrated into the host chromosomal DNA (Harrison and Brockhurst, 2012). In addition, viral DNA occasionally remains in the chromosome as a prophage. Horizontally transferred DNA, plasmid DNA, and virus DNA have lower GC content than host chromosome DNAs (Rocha and Danchin, 2002). In a previous study, I compared the GC content across 953 pairs of bacterial chromosomes and plasmids. Among the 953 pairs, 746 (78.3%) pairs showed <10% difference in the GC content of the plasmid DNA and the host chromosomal DNA (Nishida, 2012a). Probably, most bacteria are unable to maintain and regulate plasmids that show very different GC content from their own. However, why most bacteria have not acquired DNAs with GC content higher than that of their own chromosome, but have acquired DNAs with lower GC content is not clear. During evolution, DNA base mutations occurred intracellulaly and not in extracellular environments. The DNA polymerase components that are involved in DNA replication directly influence the base composition of the genome (Zhao et al., 2007; Wu et al., 2012). Variations in the bacterial genome DNA sequences cannot be fully explained on the basis of neutral mutations alone (Sueoka, 1988). In bacterial genomes, mutations from GC to adenosine–thymine (AT) are more common than mutations from AT to GC (Lind and Andersson, 2008; Hershberg and Petrov, 2010; Hildebrand et al., 2010; Rocha and Feil, 2010). I hypothesize that plasmids (and viruses) have been generated from the chromosome (Frontiers Research Topics, “Evolution and function of bacterial and archaeal genome sequences”). The host bacterial genome DNA has undergone a series of changes during evolution to become AT rich. On the other hand, the GC content in a plasmid that is in an extracellular environment would not change. Such a plasmid will not be accepted by the original host bacterium because most bacteria appear unable to acquire DNAs with GC content higher than that in their own chromosome. Such plasmids are transferred to bacteria that contain genomes with GC content higher than that in the plasmid (Figure 1). This natural system may be effective for obtaining useful genetic information (DNA fragments) from phylogenetically distant bacteria. I propose that the genome size and GC content in bacteria are correlated because genetic information has been transferred from AT-rich chromosomes to GC-rich chromosomes during evolution. If most bacteria could acquire DNAs with GC content higher than that in their own chromosome in addition to the lower GC content DNAs, then the flow of DNA fragments would not be biased and the genome size and GC content would not show a correlation. The results of previous studies indicate that bacteria contain a system (or systems) to generate and maintain GC content differences in the chromosomal DNA (e.g., Lawrence and Ochman, 1997). In order to maintain GC content, bacteria should estimate the DNA base composition of the transferred DNA fragments.
Figure 1

Flow of DNA fragments in bacteria.

Flow of DNA fragments in bacteria.
  38 in total

Review 1.  Genetic exchange between bacteria in the environment.

Authors:  J Davison
Journal:  Plasmid       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 3.466

Review 2.  Microbial minimalism: genome reduction in bacterial pathogens.

Authors:  Nancy A Moran
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2002-03-08       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 3.  Deletional bias and the evolution of bacterial genomes.

Authors:  A Mira; H Ochman; N A Moran
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 11.639

4.  Base composition bias might result from competition for metabolic resources.

Authors:  Eduardo P C Rocha; Antoine Danchin
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 11.639

Review 5.  Microbial genome evolution: sources of variability.

Authors:  Alex Mira; Lisa Klasson; Siv G E Andersson
Journal:  Curr Opin Microbiol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 7.934

Review 6.  Comparative genomic structure of prokaryotes.

Authors:  Stephen D Bentley; Julian Parkhill
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 16.830

Review 7.  Studying plasmid horizontal transfer in situ: a critical review.

Authors:  Søren J Sørensen; Mark Bailey; Lars H Hansen; Niels Kroer; Stefan Wuertz
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 60.633

8.  Selective silencing of foreign DNA with low GC content by the H-NS protein in Salmonella.

Authors:  William Wiley Navarre; Steffen Porwollik; Yipeng Wang; Michael McClelland; Henry Rosen; Stephen J Libby; Ferric C Fang
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-06-08       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Genomic GC level, optimal growth temperature, and genome size in prokaryotes.

Authors:  Héctor Musto; Hugo Naya; Alejandro Zavala; Héctor Romero; Fernando Alvarez-Valín; Giorgio Bernardi
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2006-06-19       Impact factor: 3.575

10.  Bacterial genome size reduction by experimental evolution.

Authors:  A I Nilsson; S Koskiniemi; S Eriksson; E Kugelberg; J C D Hinton; D I Andersson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-08-12       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  19 in total

1.  The quest for a unified view of bacterial land colonization.

Authors:  Hao Wu; Yongjun Fang; Jun Yu; Zhang Zhang
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2014-01-23       Impact factor: 10.302

2.  How do eubacterial organisms manage aggregation-prone proteome?

Authors:  Rishi Das Roy; Manju Bhardwaj; Vasudha Bhatnagar; Kausik Chakraborty; Debasis Dash
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2014-06-27

Review 3.  Winding paths to simplicity: genome evolution in facultative insect symbionts.

Authors:  Wen-Sui Lo; Ya-Yi Huang; Chih-Horng Kuo
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Rev       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 16.408

4.  Genome Organization of Sphingobium indicum B90A: An Archetypal Hexachlorocyclohexane (HCH) Degrading Genotype.

Authors:  Helianthous Verma; Abhay Bajaj; Roshan Kumar; Jasvinder Kaur; Shailly Anand; Namita Nayyar; Akshita Puri; Yogendra Singh; Jitendra P Khurana; Rup Lal
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 3.416

5.  Genome Report: Identification and Validation of Antigenic Proteins from Pajaroellobacter abortibovis Using De Novo Genome Sequence Assembly and Reverse Vaccinology.

Authors:  Bryan T Welly; Michael R Miller; Jeffrey L Stott; Myra T Blanchard; Alma D Islas-Trejo; Sean M O'Rourke; Amy E Young; Juan F Medrano; Alison L Van Eenennaam
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2017-02-09       Impact factor: 3.154

6.  Comparative Genomics of Marine Sponge-Derived Streptomyces spp. Isolates SM17 and SM18 With Their Closest Terrestrial Relatives Provides Novel Insights Into Environmental Niche Adaptations and Secondary Metabolite Biosynthesis Potential.

Authors:  Eduardo L Almeida; Andrés Felipe Carrillo Rincón; Stephen A Jackson; Alan D W Dobson
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2019-07-26       Impact factor: 5.640

7.  PlasForest: a homology-based random forest classifier for plasmid detection in genomic datasets.

Authors:  Léa Pradier; Tazzio Tissot; Anna-Sophie Fiston-Lavier; Stéphanie Bedhomme
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2021-06-26       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Variation, evolution, and correlation analysis of C+G content and genome or chromosome size in different kingdoms and phyla.

Authors:  Xiu-Qing Li; Donglei Du
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-13       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Non-contiguous finished genome sequence and description of Kurthia senegalensis sp. nov.

Authors:  Véronique Roux; Jean-Christophe Lagier; Aurore Gorlas; Catherine Robert; Didier Raoult
Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci       Date:  2014-02-20

10.  Modeling of the GC content of the substituted bases in bacterial core genomes.

Authors:  Jon Bohlin; Vegard Eldholm; Ola Brynildsrud; John H-O Petterson; Kristian Alfsnes
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2018-08-06       Impact factor: 3.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.