Literature DB >> 16815305

Genomic GC level, optimal growth temperature, and genome size in prokaryotes.

Héctor Musto1, Hugo Naya, Alejandro Zavala, Héctor Romero, Fernando Alvarez-Valín, Giorgio Bernardi.   

Abstract

Two years ago, we showed that positive correlations between optimal growth temperature (T(opt)) and genome GC are observed in 15 out of the 20 families of prokaryotes we analyzed, thus indicating that "T(opt) is one of the factors that influence genomic GC in prokaryotes". Our results were disputed, but these criticisms were demonstrated to be mistaken and based on misconceptions. In a recent report, Wang et al. [H.C. Wang, E. Susko, A.J. Roger, On the correlation between genomic G+C content and optimal growth temperature in prokaryotes: data quality and confounding factors, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 342 (2006) 681-684] criticize our results by stating that "all previous simple correlation analyses of GC versus temperature have ignored the fact that genomic GC content is influenced by multiple factors including both intrinsic mutational bias and extrinsic environmental factors". This statement, besides being erroneous, is surprising because it applies in fact not to ours but to the authors' article. Here, we rebut the points raised by Wang et al. and review some issues that have been a matter of debate, regarding the influence of environmental factors upon GC content in prokaryotes. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the relationship that exists between genome size and GC level is valid for aerobic, facultative, and microaerophilic species, but not for anaerobic prokaryotes.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16815305     DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2006.06.054

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun        ISSN: 0006-291X            Impact factor:   3.575


  67 in total

1.  Genome size and DNA base composition of geophytes: the mirror of phenology and ecology?

Authors:  Pavel Veselý; Petr Bures; Petr Smarda; Tomás Pavlícek
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2011-10-21       Impact factor: 4.357

2.  Comparative analysis of acidobacterial genomic fragments from terrestrial and aquatic metagenomic libraries, with emphasis on acidobacteria subdivision 6.

Authors:  Anna M Kielak; Johannes A van Veen; George A Kowalchuk
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-08-20       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Phylogenomic analysis of the uracil-DNA glycosylase superfamily.

Authors:  J Ignacio Lucas-Lledó; Rohan Maddamsetti; Michael Lynch
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2010-12-06       Impact factor: 16.240

Review 4.  Mutation--The Engine of Evolution: Studying Mutation and Its Role in the Evolution of Bacteria.

Authors:  Ruth Hershberg
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 10.005

5.  A plot of G + C content against sequence length of 640 bacterial chromosomes shows the points are widely scattered in the upper triangular area.

Authors:  Feng-Biao Guo; Hao Lin; Jian Huang
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2009-03-13       Impact factor: 5.239

6.  Mutation bias favors protein folding stability in the evolution of small populations.

Authors:  Raul Mendez; Miriam Fritsche; Markus Porto; Ugo Bastolla
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2010-05-06       Impact factor: 4.475

7.  Genomic comparisons of Brucella spp. and closely related bacteria using base compositional and proteome based methods.

Authors:  Jon Bohlin; Lars Snipen; Axel Cloeckaert; Karin Lagesen; David Ussery; Anja B Kristoffersen; Jacques Godfroid
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2010-08-13       Impact factor: 3.260

8.  The systemic imprint of growth and its uses in ecological (meta)genomics.

Authors:  Sara Vieira-Silva; Eduardo P C Rocha
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2010-01-15       Impact factor: 5.917

9.  Analysis of genomic signatures in prokaryotes using multinomial regression and hierarchical clustering.

Authors:  Jon Bohlin; Eystein Skjerve; David W Ussery
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2009-10-21       Impact factor: 3.969

10.  Examination of genome homogeneity in prokaryotes using genomic signatures.

Authors:  Jon Bohlin; Eystein Skjerve
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-12-02       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.