Literature DB >> 17598735

Success and failure of new speech category learning in adulthood: consequences of learned Hebbian attractors in topographic maps.

Gautam K Vallabha1, James L McClelland.   

Abstract

The influence of a native language on learning new speech sounds in adulthood is addressed using a network model in which speech categories are attractors implemented through interactive activation and Hebbian learning. The network has a representation layer that receives topographic projections from an input layer and has reciprocal excitatory connections with deeper layers. When applied to an experiment in which Japanese adults were trained to distinguish the English /r/-/l/ contrast (McCandliss, Fiez, Protopapas, Conway, & McClelland, 2002), the model can account for many aspects of the experimental results, such as the time course and outcome of the learning, how it varies as a function of feedback, the relative efficacy of adaptive and initially easy training stimuli versus nonadaptive and difficult stimuli, and the development of a discrimination peak at the acquired category boundary. The model is also able to capture some aspects of the individual differences in learning.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17598735     DOI: 10.3758/cabn.7.1.53

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci        ISSN: 1530-7026            Impact factor:   3.282


  52 in total

1.  Functional imaging of perceptual learning in human primary and secondary somatosensory cortex.

Authors:  Burkhard Pleger; Ann Freya Foerster; Patrick Ragert; Hubert R Dinse; Peter Schwenkreis; Jean Pierre Malin; Volkmar Nicolas; Martin Tegenthoff
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2003-10-30       Impact factor: 17.173

2.  The discrimination of speech sounds within and across phoneme boundaries.

Authors:  A M LIBERMAN; K S HARRIS; H S HOFFMAN; B C GRIFFITH
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1957-11

3.  Changes in the distributed temporal response properties of SI cortical neurons reflect improvements in performance on a temporally based tactile discrimination task.

Authors:  G H Recanzone; M M Merzenich; C E Schreiner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Phonetic training with acoustic cue manipulations: a comparison of methods for teaching English /r/-/l/ to Japanese adults.

Authors:  Paul Iverson; Valerie Hazan; Kerry Bannister
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Hebbian LTP in feed-forward inhibitory interneurons and the temporal fidelity of input discrimination.

Authors:  Karri Lamsa; Joost H Heeroma; Dimitri M Kullmann
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 24.884

6.  Modeling perceptual learning: difficulties and how they can be overcome.

Authors:  M H Herzog; M Fahle
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 2.086

Review 7.  Cortical plasticity: from synapses to maps.

Authors:  D V Buonomano; M M Merzenich
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 12.449

8.  Auditory and phonetic memory codes in the discrimination of consonants and vowels.

Authors:  David B Pisoni
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1973-06-01

9.  The TRACE model of speech perception.

Authors:  J L McClelland; J L Elman
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/. II: The role of phonetic environment and talker variability in learning new perceptual categories.

Authors:  S E Lively; J S Logan; D B Pisoni
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  22 in total

Review 1.  Visual perceptual learning.

Authors:  Zhong-Lin Lu; Tianmiao Hua; Chang-Bing Huang; Yifeng Zhou; Barbara Anne Dosher
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2010-09-24       Impact factor: 2.877

2.  The Role of the Human Auditory Corticostriatal Network in Speech Learning.

Authors:  Gangyi Feng; Han Gyol Yi; Bharath Chandrasekaran
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 5.357

3.  Tests of a Dual-systems Model of Speech Category Learning.

Authors:  W Todd Maddox; Bharath Chandrasekaran
Journal:  Biling (Camb Engl)       Date:  2014-10-01

4.  Unattended exposure to components of speech sounds yields same benefits as explicit auditory training.

Authors:  Aaron R Seitz; Athanassios Protopapas; Yoshiaki Tsushima; Eleni L Vlahou; Simone Gori; Stephen Grossberg; Takeo Watanabe
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2010-03-25

5.  Elevated depressive symptoms enhance reflexive but not reflective auditory category learning.

Authors:  W Todd Maddox; Bharath Chandrasekaran; Kirsten Smayda; Han-Gyol Yi; Seth Koslov; Christopher G Beevers
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 4.027

6.  Face-selective neurons maintain consistent visual responses across months.

Authors:  David B T McMahon; Adam P Jones; Igor V Bondar; David A Leopold
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-05-05       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 7.  A unified account of categorical effects in phonetic perception.

Authors:  Yakov Kronrod; Emily Coppess; Naomi H Feldman
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-12

Review 8.  Errorless learning in cognitive rehabilitation: a critical review.

Authors:  Erica L Middleton; Myrna F Schwartz
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rehabil       Date:  2012-01-16       Impact factor: 2.868

9.  The influence of categories on perception: explaining the perceptual magnet effect as optimal statistical inference.

Authors:  Naomi H Feldman; Thomas L Griffiths; James L Morgan
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 8.934

10.  Modeling trial by trial and block feedback in perceptual learning.

Authors:  Jiajuan Liu; Barbara Dosher; Zhong-Lin Lu
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2014-01-11       Impact factor: 1.886

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.