Literature DB >> 23255833

Auditory and Phonetic Processes in Speech Perception: Evidence from a Dichotic Study().

Michael Studdert-Kennedy1, Donald Shankweiler, David Pisoni.   

Abstract

The distinction between auditory and phonetic processes in speech perception was used in the design and analysis of an experiment. Earlier studies had shown that dichotically presented stop consonants are more often identified correctly when they share place of production (e.g., /ba-pa/) or voicing (e.g., /ba-da/) than when neither feature is shared (e.g., /ba-ta/). The present experiment was intended to determine whether the effect has an auditory or a phonetic basis. Increments in performance due to feature-sharing were compared for synthetic stop-vowel syllables in which formant transitions were the sole cues to place of production under two experimental conditions: (1) when the vowel was the same for both syllables in a dichotic pair, as in our earlier studies, and (2) when the vowels differed. Since the increment in performance due to sharing place was not diminished when vowels differed (i.e., when formant transitions did not coincide), it was concluded that the effect has a phonetic rather than an auditory basis. Right ear advantages were also measured and were found to interact with both place of production and vowel conditions. Taken together, the two sets of results suggest that inhibition of the ipsilateral signal in the perception of dichotically presented speech occurs during phonetic analysis.

Year:  1972        PMID: 23255833      PMCID: PMC3523680          DOI: 10.1016/0010-0285(72)90017-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Psychol        ISSN: 0010-0285            Impact factor:   3.468


  6 in total

1.  Identification of consonants and vowels presented to left and right ears.

Authors:  D Shankweiler; M Studdert-Kennedy
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol       Date:  1967-02       Impact factor: 2.143

2.  Hemispheric specialization for speech perception.

Authors:  M Studdert-Kennedy; D Shankweiler
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1970-08       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Ear differences in the recall of fricatives and vowels.

Authors:  C J Darwin
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol       Date:  1971-02       Impact factor: 2.143

4.  The influence of language set on ear preference in phoneme recognition.

Authors:  F Spellacy; S Blumstein
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  1970-12       Impact factor: 4.027

5.  Effects of temporal-lobe damage of perception of dichotically presented melodies.

Authors:  D Shankweiler
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1966-08

6.  Lateralized suppression of dichotically presented digits after commissural section in man.

Authors:  B Milner; L Taylor; R W Sperry
Journal:  Science       Date:  1968-07-12       Impact factor: 47.728

  6 in total
  8 in total

1.  Low-frequency signals support perceptual organization of implant-simulated speech for adults and children.

Authors:  Susan Nittrouer; Eric Tarr; Virginia Bolster; Amanda Caldwell-Tarr; Aaron C Moberly; Joanna H Lowenstein
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2014-01-23       Impact factor: 2.117

2.  Auditory property detectors and processing place features in stop consonants.

Authors:  David B Pisoni; Jeffrey Tash
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1975-11

3.  Auditory and phonetic memory codes in the discrimination of consonants and vowels.

Authors:  David B Pisoni
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1973-06-01

4.  Dichotic Interactions of Speech Sounds and Phonetic Feature Processing.

Authors:  David B Pisoni; Sandra D McNabb
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  1974-10       Impact factor: 2.381

5.  Auditory spectral integration in nontraditional speech cues in diotic and dichotic listening.

Authors:  Robert Allen Fox; Ewa Jacewicz
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  2010-10

6.  Integration of consonant and pitch processing as revealed by the absence of additivity in mismatch negativity.

Authors:  Shan Gao; Jiehui Hu; Diankun Gong; Sifan Chen; Keith M Kendrick; Dezhong Yao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Auditive training effects from a dichotic listening app in children with dyslexia.

Authors:  Turid Helland; Frøydis Morken; Josef J Bless; Hanna V Valderhaug; Monica Eiken; Wenche A Helland; Janne V K Torkildsen
Journal:  Dyslexia       Date:  2018-11

8.  Examining the Relationship Between Speech Perception, Production Distinctness, and Production Variability.

Authors:  Hung-Shao Cheng; Caroline A Niziolek; Adam Buchwald; Tara McAllister
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 3.169

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.