Literature DB >> 23224779

Body image issues after bilateral prophylactic mastectomy with breast reconstruction in healthy women at risk for hereditary breast cancer.

Jessica P Gopie1, Marc A M Mureau, Caroline Seynaeve, Moniek M Ter Kuile, Marian B E Menke-Pluymers, Reinier Timman, Aad Tibben.   

Abstract

The outcome of bilateral prophylactic mastectomy with breast reconstruction (BPM-IBR) in healthy BRCA1/2 mutation carriers can be potentially burdensome for body image and the intimate relationship. Therefore, in the current analysis the impact on body image, sexual and partner relationship satisfaction was prospectively investigated in women opting for BPM-IBR as well as cancer distress and general quality of life. Healthy women undergoing BPM-IBR completed questionnaires preoperatively (T0, n = 48), at 6 months (T1, n = 44) and after finishing breast reconstruction (median 21 months, range 12-35) (T2, n = 36). With multi-level regression analyses the course of outcome variables was investigated and a statistically significant change in body image and/or sexual and partner relationship satisfaction was predicted by baseline covariates. Body image significantly decreased at T1. At T2 sexual relationship satisfaction and body image tended to be lower compared to baseline. The overall partner relationship satisfaction did not significantly change. At T2, 37 % of the women reported that their breasts felt unpleasantly, 29 % was not satisfied with their breast appearance and 21 % felt embarrassed for their naked body. Most body image issues remained unchanged in 30 % of the women. A negative body image was predicted by high preoperative cancer distress. BPM-IBR was associated with adverse impact on body image in a substantial subgroup, but satisfaction with the overall sexual and partner relationship did not significantly change in time. The psychosocial impact of BPM-IBR in unaffected women should not be underestimated. Psychological support should ideally be integrated both before and after BPM-IBR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23224779     DOI: 10.1007/s10689-012-9588-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Cancer        ISSN: 1389-9600            Impact factor:   2.375


  49 in total

1.  Translation, validation, and norming of the Dutch language version of the SF-36 Health Survey in community and chronic disease populations.

Authors:  N K Aaronson; M Muller; P D Cohen; M L Essink-Bot; M Fekkes; R Sanderman; M A Sprangers; A te Velde; E Verrips
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 6.437

2.  The psychosocial impact of bilateral prophylactic mastectomy: prospective study using questionnaires and semistructured interviews.

Authors:  M B Hatcher; L Fallowfield; R A'Hern
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-01-13

3.  Genetic heterogeneity and penetrance analysis of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes in breast cancer families. The Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium.

Authors:  D Ford; D F Easton; M Stratton; S Narod; D Goldgar; P Devilee; D T Bishop; B Weber; G Lenoir; J Chang-Claude; H Sobol; M D Teare; J Struewing; A Arason; S Scherneck; J Peto; T R Rebbeck; P Tonin; S Neuhausen; R Barkardottir; J Eyfjord; H Lynch; B A Ponder; S A Gayther; M Zelada-Hedman
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation.

Authors:  Noah D Kauff; Jaya M Satagopan; Mark E Robson; Lauren Scheuer; Martee Hensley; Clifford A Hudis; Nathan A Ellis; Jeff Boyd; Patrick I Borgen; Richard R Barakat; Larry Norton; Mercedes Castiel; Khedoudja Nafa; Kenneth Offit
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-05-20       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 5.  Body image after bilateral prophylactic mastectomy: an integrative literature review.

Authors:  Amy McGaughey
Journal:  J Midwifery Womens Health       Date:  2006 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.388

Review 6.  Quality of life and health status after prophylactic salpingo-oophorectomy in women who carry a BRCA mutation: A review.

Authors:  Amy Finch; Steven A Narod
Journal:  Maturitas       Date:  2011-09-04       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Climacteric symptoms in women undergoing risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy.

Authors:  A Benshushan; N Rojansky; M Chaviv; S Arbel-Alon; A Benmeir; T Imbar; A Brzezinski
Journal:  Climacteric       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.005

8.  International variation in rates of uptake of preventive options in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers.

Authors:  Kelly A Metcalfe; Daphna Birenbaum-Carmeli; Jan Lubinski; Jacek Gronwald; Henry Lynch; Pal Moller; Parviz Ghadirian; William D Foulkes; Jan Klijn; Eitan Friedman; Charmaine Kim-Sing; Peter Ainsworth; Barry Rosen; Susan Domchek; Teresa Wagner; Nadine Tung; Siranoush Manoukian; Fergus Couch; Ping Sun; Steven A Narod
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2008-05-01       Impact factor: 7.396

9.  Psychological reactions, quality of life, and body image after bilateral prophylactic mastectomy in women at high risk for breast cancer: a prospective 1-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Yvonne Brandberg; Kerstin Sandelin; Staffan Erikson; Göran Jurell; Annelie Liljegren; Annika Lindblom; Ann Lindén; Anna von Wachenfeldt; Marie Wickman; Brita Arver
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-08-20       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Standard psychological consultations and follow up for women at increased risk of hereditary breast cancer considering prophylactic mastectomy.

Authors:  Murly B M Tan; Eveline M A Bleiker; Marian B E Menke-Pluymers; Arthur R Van Gool; Silvia van Dooren; Bert N Van Geel; Madeleine M A Tilanus-Linthorst; Karina C M Bartels; Jan G M Klijn; Cecile T M Brekelmans; Caroline Seynaeve
Journal:  Hered Cancer Clin Pract       Date:  2009-03-31       Impact factor: 2.857

View more
  24 in total

1.  Psychosocial and Sexual Well-Being Following Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Reconstruction.

Authors:  Cindy H Wei; Amie M Scott; Alison N Price; Helen Catherine Miller; Anne F Klassen; Sabrina M Jhanwar; Babak J Mehrara; Joseph J Disa; Colleen McCarthy; Evan Matros; Peter G Cordeiro; Virgilio Sacchini; Andrea L Pusic
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.431

2.  Perspectives of Women Considering Bilateral Prophylactic Mastectomy and their Peers towards a Telephone-Based Peer Support Intervention.

Authors:  D St-Pierre; K Bouchard; L Gauthier; J Chiquette; Michel Dorval
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Preoperative psychosocial characteristics may predict body image and sexuality two years after risk-reducing mastectomy: a prospective study.

Authors:  Dmytro Unukovych; Hemming Johansson; Yvonne Brandberg
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2017-02

Review 4.  Risk-reducing mastectomy.

Authors:  Federica Chiesa; Virgilio S Sacchini
Journal:  Minerva Ginecol       Date:  2016-01-19

Review 5.  Quality of life among patients after bilateral prophylactic mastectomy: a systematic review of patient-reported outcomes.

Authors:  Shantanu N Razdan; Vishal Patel; Sarah Jewell; Colleen M McCarthy
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2015-11-14       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 6.  Hereditary diffuse gastric cancer: updated clinical practice guidelines.

Authors:  Vanessa R Blair; Maybelle McLeod; Fátima Carneiro; Daniel G Coit; Johanna L D'Addario; Jolanda M van Dieren; Kirsty L Harris; Nicoline Hoogerbrugge; Carla Oliveira; Rachel S van der Post; Julie Arnold; Patrick R Benusiglio; Tanya M Bisseling; Alex Boussioutas; Annemieke Cats; Amanda Charlton; Karen E Chelcun Schreiber; Jeremy L Davis; Massimiliano di Pietro; Rebecca C Fitzgerald; James M Ford; Kimberley Gamet; Irene Gullo; Richard H Hardwick; David G Huntsman; Pardeep Kaurah; Sonia S Kupfer; Andrew Latchford; Paul F Mansfield; Takeshi Nakajima; Susan Parry; Jeremy Rossaak; Haruhiko Sugimura; Magali Svrcek; Marc Tischkowitz; Toshikazu Ushijima; Hidetaka Yamada; Han-Kwang Yang; Adrian Claydon; Joana Figueiredo; Karyn Paringatai; Raquel Seruca; Nicola Bougen-Zhukov; Tom Brew; Simone Busija; Patricia Carneiro; Lynn DeGregorio; Helen Fisher; Erin Gardner; Tanis D Godwin; Katharine N Holm; Bostjan Humar; Caroline J Lintott; Elizabeth C Monroe; Mark D Muller; Enrique Norero; Yasmin Nouri; Joana Paredes; João M Sanches; Emily Schulpen; Ana S Ribeiro; Andrew Sporle; James Whitworth; Liying Zhang; Anthony E Reeve; Parry Guilford
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 41.316

7.  Long-term outcomes of risk-reducing surgery in unaffected women at increased familial risk of breast and/or ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Louise Heiniger; Phyllis N Butow; Joseph Coll; Tracey Bullen; Judy Wilson; Brandi Baylock; Bettina Meiser; Melanie A Price
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 2.375

8.  Differences Among a Modern Cohort of BRCA Mutation Carriers Choosing Bilateral Prophylactic Mastectomies Compared to Breast Surveillance.

Authors:  Elizabeth Gilbert; Emily C Zabor; Michelle Stempel; Debra Mangino; Alexandra Heerdt; Melissa Pilewskie
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 5.344

9.  Influences on Satisfaction with Reconstructed Breasts and Intimacy in Younger Women Following Bilateral Prophylactic Mastectomy: a Qualitative Analysis.

Authors:  Rachael Glassey; Moira O'Connor; Angela Ives; Christobel Saunders; Sarah J Hardcastle
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2018-08

10.  Choosing high-risk screening vs. surgery and the effect of treatment modality on anxiety and breast-specific sensuality in BRCA mutation carriers.

Authors:  Kristin E Rojas; Elizabeth Butler; Julie Gutierrez; Rebecca Kwait; Jessica Laprise; Jennifer Scalia Wilbur; Sarah Spinette; Christina A Raker; Katina Robison; Robert Legare; Jennifer Gass; Ashley Stuckey
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2019-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.