Eray Atlı1,2, Erhan Akpınar3, Emre Ünal3, Berna Oğuz Sayan3, Mithat Haliloğlu3. 1. Department of Radiology, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey. atlieray@gmail.com. 2. Department of Radiology, Okan University Hospital, İçmeler district, Aydınlı Yolu street, 34947, Tuzla/İstanbul, Turkey. atlieray@gmail.com. 3. Department of Radiology, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To investigate feasibility of high-pitch acquisition protocol for imaging of pediatric abdomen. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study group consisted of 90 patients scanned with high-pitch acquisition protocol (pitch = 3) by 64-slice dual-source CT (DSCT) scanner. Fifty-four patients scanned with standard protocol (pitch = 1.5) by 16-slice single-source CT scanner comprised the control group. Anteroposterior and lateral diameters of abdomen, effective diameter, scan time and length, qualitative and quantitative noise levels, volumetric CT dose index (CTDIvol), dose length product (DLP), and size-specific dose estimations were compared between groups. RESULTS: The mean scan time of high-pitch CT protocol was shorter than control protocol (1.66 ± 0.31 vs. 4.1 ± 0.75 s; p < 0.001). The high-pitch protocol reduced the radiation dose by 48% (CTDIvol and DLP values 0.94 mGy and 32.2 mGy-cm vs. 1.59 mGy and 61.5 mGy-cm; p < 0.001, respectively). Although image noise was higher with high-pitch acquisition, there was no significant effect on diagnostic confidence. Voluntary and involuntary artifacts were less frequent in high-pitch protocol (p < 0.001). Interobserver agreement was moderate in terms of artifact and very good in terms of diagnostic confidence assessment. CONCLUSION: High-pitch acquisition protocol by DSCT yields significant radiation dose reduction without compromising image quality and diagnostic confidence for pediatric abdomen imaging.
PURPOSE: To investigate feasibility of high-pitch acquisition protocol for imaging of pediatric abdomen. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study group consisted of 90 patients scanned with high-pitch acquisition protocol (pitch = 3) by 64-slice dual-source CT (DSCT) scanner. Fifty-four patients scanned with standard protocol (pitch = 1.5) by 16-slice single-source CT scanner comprised the control group. Anteroposterior and lateral diameters of abdomen, effective diameter, scan time and length, qualitative and quantitative noise levels, volumetric CT dose index (CTDIvol), dose length product (DLP), and size-specific dose estimations were compared between groups. RESULTS: The mean scan time of high-pitch CT protocol was shorter than control protocol (1.66 ± 0.31 vs. 4.1 ± 0.75 s; p < 0.001). The high-pitch protocol reduced the radiation dose by 48% (CTDIvol and DLP values 0.94 mGy and 32.2 mGy-cm vs. 1.59 mGy and 61.5 mGy-cm; p < 0.001, respectively). Although image noise was higher with high-pitch acquisition, there was no significant effect on diagnostic confidence. Voluntary and involuntary artifacts were less frequent in high-pitch protocol (p < 0.001). Interobserver agreement was moderate in terms of artifact and very good in terms of diagnostic confidence assessment. CONCLUSION: High-pitch acquisition protocol by DSCT yields significant radiation dose reduction without compromising image quality and diagnostic confidence for pediatric abdomen imaging.
Entities:
Keywords:
Abdominal CT; Dual source; High pitch; Pediatrics; Radiation dose
Authors: Fred A Mettler; Bruce R Thomadsen; Mythreyi Bhargavan; Debbie B Gilley; Joel E Gray; Jill A Lipoti; John McCrohan; Terry T Yoshizumi; Mahadevappa Mahesh Journal: Health Phys Date: 2008-11 Impact factor: 1.316
Authors: Robert Goetti; Stephan Baumüller; Gudrun Feuchtner; Paul Stolzmann; Christoph Karlo; Hatem Alkadhi; Sebastian Leschka Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2010-04 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Gregory A Vorona; Rafael C Ceschin; Barbara L Clayton; Tom Sutcavage; Sameh S Tadros; Ashok Panigrahy Journal: Pediatr Radiol Date: 2011-05-19
Authors: Sebastian Leschka; Paul Stolzmann; Lotus Desbiolles; Stephan Baumueller; Robert Goetti; Thomas Schertler; Hans Scheffel; Andre Plass; Volkmar Falk; Gudrun Feuchtner; Borut Marincek; Hatem Alkadhi Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2009-09-16 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Martin Petersilka; Herbert Bruder; Bernhard Krauss; Karl Stierstorfer; Thomas G Flohr Journal: Eur J Radiol Date: 2008-10-07 Impact factor: 3.528