S Soltani1, G R Hunter2, A Kazemi3, S Shab-Bidar4. 1. Department of Nutrition, School of Public Health, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Hemaat Highway, 1449614535, Tehran, Iran. 2. Department of Human Studies School of Education, University of Alabama at Birmingham, EB 205 1720 2nd Ave South, Birmingham, AL, 34294-1250, USA. 3. Department of Community Nutrition, School of Nutritional Sciences and Dietetics, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, P. O. Box 14155/6117, Amir Abad, Keshavarz Boulevard, Tehran, Iran. 4. Department of Community Nutrition, School of Nutritional Sciences and Dietetics, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, P. O. Box 14155/6117, Amir Abad, Keshavarz Boulevard, Tehran, Iran. s_shabbidar@tums.ac.ir.
Abstract
UNLABELLED: We assessed the impact of weight loss strategies including calorie restriction and exercise training on BMD in adults using a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Weight reduction results in reduced BMD at the hip, but has less effect on the spine. Both calorie restriction and a combination of calorie restriction and exercise result in a decrease in hip bone density, whereas weight loss response to exercise training without dietary restriction leads to increased hip BMD. INTRODUCTION: Findings are not consistent on the effect of weight loss on bone mineral density (BMD). We conducted a systematic review on the randomized controlled trials to assess the effect of weight loss strategies, including calorie restriction and exercise programs on BMD in adults. METHODS: A structured and comprehensive search of MEDLINE and EMBASE databases was undertaken up to March 2016. Study-specific mean differences (MD) were pooled using a random-effects model. Subgroup analysis and meta-regression were used to find possible sources of between-study heterogeneity. RESULTS: Thirty-two randomized controlled trials met predetermined inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis revealed no significant difference on total BMD (MD 0.007, 95 % CI -0.020-0.034, p = 0.608). In contrast, the pooled data of studies showed a significant effect of weight loss on hip BMD (MD -0.008, 95 % CI -0.09 to -0.006 g/cm(2), p < 0.001) and also lumbar spine BMD (MD -0.018 g/cm(2), 95 % CI -0.019 to -0.017, p < 0.001). BMD in the hip site decreased after more than 4 months, especially in those who were obese. Moreover, calorie restriction interventions longer than 13 months showed a significant decreased in lumbar spine BMD. CONCLUSION: Weight loss led to significant decreases at the hip and lumbar spine BMD but not at the total. Weight loss response following calorie restriction resulted in a decrease in hip and lumbar spine bone density especially more than 1 year; whereas an exercise-induced weight loss did not.
UNLABELLED: We assessed the impact of weight loss strategies including calorie restriction and exercise training on BMD in adults using a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Weight reduction results in reduced BMD at the hip, but has less effect on the spine. Both calorie restriction and a combination of calorie restriction and exercise result in a decrease in hip bone density, whereas weight loss response to exercise training without dietary restriction leads to increased hip BMD. INTRODUCTION: Findings are not consistent on the effect of weight loss on bone mineral density (BMD). We conducted a systematic review on the randomized controlled trials to assess the effect of weight loss strategies, including calorie restriction and exercise programs on BMD in adults. METHODS: A structured and comprehensive search of MEDLINE and EMBASE databases was undertaken up to March 2016. Study-specific mean differences (MD) were pooled using a random-effects model. Subgroup analysis and meta-regression were used to find possible sources of between-study heterogeneity. RESULTS: Thirty-two randomized controlled trials met predetermined inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis revealed no significant difference on total BMD (MD 0.007, 95 % CI -0.020-0.034, p = 0.608). In contrast, the pooled data of studies showed a significant effect of weight loss on hip BMD (MD -0.008, 95 % CI -0.09 to -0.006 g/cm(2), p < 0.001) and also lumbar spine BMD (MD -0.018 g/cm(2), 95 % CI -0.019 to -0.017, p < 0.001). BMD in the hip site decreased after more than 4 months, especially in those who were obese. Moreover, calorie restriction interventions longer than 13 months showed a significant decreased in lumbar spine BMD. CONCLUSION:Weight loss led to significant decreases at the hip and lumbar spine BMD but not at the total. Weight loss response following calorie restriction resulted in a decrease in hip and lumbar spine bone density especially more than 1 year; whereas an exercise-induced weight loss did not.
Entities:
Keywords:
Bone mineral density; Calorie restriction; Meta-analysis; Obesity; Systematic review; Weight reduction
Authors: James R Berenson; Ori Yellin; Ralph V Boccia; Marshall Flam; Siu-Fun Wong; Olcay Batuman; Mehdi M Moezi; Donald Woytowitz; Herbert Duvivier; Youram Nassir; Regina A Swift Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2008-10-01 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Matthew P Thorpe; Edward H Jacobson; Donald K Layman; Xuming He; Penny M Kris-Etherton; Ellen M Evans Journal: J Nutr Date: 2008-06 Impact factor: 4.798
Authors: Carolyn J Crandall; Vedat O Yildiz; Jean Wactawski-Wende; Karen C Johnson; Zhao Chen; Scott B Going; Nicole C Wright; Jane A Cauley Journal: BMJ Date: 2015-01-27
Authors: Carrie M Nielson; Jack Wiedrick; Jian Shen; Jon Jacobs; Erin S Baker; Aaron Baraff; Paul Piehowski; Christine G Lee; Arie Baratt; Vladislav Petyuk; Shannon McWeeney; Jeong Youn Lim; Douglas C Bauer; Nancy E Lane; Peggy M Cawthon; Richard D Smith; Jodi Lapidus; Eric S Orwoll Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2017-04-06 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: Henry J Pownall; Anne V Schwartz; George A Bray; Robert I Berkowitz; Cora E Lewis; Edward J Boyko; John M Jakicic; Haiying Chen; Stanley Heshka; Edward W Gregg; Karen C Johnson Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2016-07-28 Impact factor: 5.002