| Literature DB >> 23209849 |
Melissa L Sykes1, Jonathan B Baell, Marcel Kaiser, Eric Chatelain, Sarah R Moawad, Danny Ganame, Jean-Robert Ioset, Vicky M Avery.
Abstract
Human African Trypanosomiasis (HAT) is caused by two trypanosome sub-species, Trypanosoma brucei rhodesiense and Trypanosoma brucei gambiense. Drugs available for the treatment of HAT have significant issues related to difficult administration regimes and limited efficacy across species and disease stages. Hence, there is considerable need to find new alternative and less toxic drugs. An approach to identify starting points for new drug candidates is high throughput screening (HTS) of large compound library collections. We describe the application of an Alamar Blue based, 384-well HTS assay to screen a library of 87,296 compounds against the related trypanosome subspecies, Trypanosoma brucei brucei bloodstream form lister 427. Primary hits identified against T.b. brucei were retested and the IC(50) value compounds were estimated for T.b. brucei and a mammalian cell line HEK293, to determine a selectivity index for each compound. The screening campaign identified 205 compounds with greater than 10 times selectivity against T.b. brucei. Cluster analysis of these compounds, taking into account chemical and structural properties required for drug-like compounds, afforded a panel of eight compounds for further biological analysis. These compounds had IC(50) values ranging from 0.22 µM to 4 µM with associated selectivity indices ranging from 19 to greater than 345. Further testing against T.b. rhodesiense led to the selection of 6 compounds from 5 new chemical classes with activity against the causative species of HAT, which can be considered potential candidates for HAT early drug discovery. Structure activity relationship (SAR) mining revealed components of those hit compound structures that may be important for biological activity. Four of these compounds have undergone further testing to 1) determine whether they are cidal or static in vitro at the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), and 2) estimate the time to kill.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 23209849 PMCID: PMC3510080 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001896
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS Negl Trop Dis ISSN: 1935-2727
Figure 1The refined substructures used for SAR mining of prioritised compounds.
Parent compounds (with substructures used in the search for each) were: compounds 1–2 (A1–A2); compound 3 (B1–B3); compound 6 (D1); compound 8 (E1); compound 7 (E1–E3). In the substructures, “A” = any atom except for H. All hydrogens are made explicit.
Figure 2Signal window in the T.b. brucei primary screening campaign.
The signal window for each of 248 plates containing test compounds in the primary screening campaign, expressed as a ratio of the negative to positive controls. Each dot represents the signal window calculated for a single plate. Control plates, one per 20 test compound plates, contained half a 384-well plate of 2 µM of the positive control compound, pentamidine. Negative assay controls, of 0.42% DMSO, were contained in column 24 of each assay plate containing test compounds, or 16 wells in total. The signal window was based on the average of column 24, divided by the average of the positive control taken from the control plate.
Figure 3Signal and reproducibility of negative and positive controls in the T.b. brucei primary and retest assays.
The negative and positive control assay signals (fluorescence intensity, left Y-axis) taken from whole control plates (one per 20 test compound plates) in the primary screening (A) and retest (B) screening campaigns. Negative controls were averaged from wells containing 0.42% DMSO and positive controls were from wells containing 2 µM pentamidine. The bar plots show the Z'-factor (Z', right Y-axis) for each control plate, a measure of the reproducibility of the controls in the assay.
Figure 4Reference compound activity against T.b. brucei in the primary screening campaign.
Dose-response curves for the reference compounds pentamidine, puromycin and diminazene against T.b. brucei in the primary screening campaign. Means and standard deviations of replicate IC50 values were (A) pentamidine, 14.7±4.7 nM (B) puromycin, 61.86±6.8 nM and (C) diminazene, 65.4 nM±12.5 nM. Data is representative of 13 control plates each containing 3 replicates of the compounds in dose, with batches indicative of daily screens.
Activity of re-isolated compounds identified from the T.b. brucei primary and retest campaigns.
| Compound activity (µM) | Selectivity Index | |||||||||
| Compound |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 | 0.785±0.0829(3.89) | 1.47±0.390 | 46.1±22.4 | 35.4±2.75 | 2.32±0.0601 | >96.0 | 42.3 | 1.35 | 1.76 | 26.8 |
| 2 | 4.00±0.0555(17.0) | 6.77±0.545 | 47.3±0.324 | 23.9±8.48 | 19.3±0.0905 | >19.0 | 17.6 | 2.53 | 5.00 | 6.20 |
| 3 | 1.13±0.347(3.21) | 0.854±0.332 | 16.1±1.70 | 14.3±6.64 | 19.1±5.32 | >67.1 | 58.5 | 3.09 | 3.48 | 2.56 |
| 4 | 3.08±0.290(3.33) | 4.85±2.08 | 0.488±0.154 | 8.17±4.00 | 15.4±4.29 | 24.6 | 0.186 | 1.84 | 0.110 | 0.0588 |
| 5 | 2.11±0.130(3.09) | 14.4±0.0995 | 6.60±1.56 | 12.62±5.87 | 14.76±0.151 | >35.9 | 1.51 | 3.29 | 1.72 | 1.47 |
| 6 | 1.16±0.304(0.785) | 0.967±0.450 | 34.0±5.60 | 11.33±4.79 | 19.1±5.32 | >65.3 | 18.4 | 0.525 | 1.58 | 0.933 |
| 7 | 0.218±0.00714(6.80) | 0.586±0.073 | 1.82±0.277 | 7.76±3.22 | 0.230±0.0496 | >344 | 38.4 | 12.5 | 2.92 | 98.6 |
| 8 | 2.61±0.320(3.03) | 0.875±0.065 | >263 | 5.33±2.04 | 82.1±1.69 | >29.0 | 150 | NA | 24.8 | 1.61 |
| Reference Compound | Reference Compound Activity (nM) | |||||||||
| Puromycin | 58.4±0.769(4.90) | 8.90 | ||||||||
| Pentamidine | 3.52±0.360(1.65) | >283 | ||||||||
| Diminazene | 121±9.04(4.25) | >330 | ||||||||
| Melarsoprol | 6.28±1.78 | 2915 | ||||||||
| Miltefosine | 365±93.7 | 392 | ||||||||
| Chloroquine | 164±24.7 | 507 | ||||||||
| Benznidazole | 1680±1930 | >206 | ||||||||
Species names are abbreviated. T.B = T.b. brucei; T.R = T.b rhodesiense; L.D = L. donovani; P.F = P. falciparum; T.C = T. cruzi.
NA is not applicable as the IC50 value could not be determined within the dose range.
Compound numbers refer to those outlined in Figure 4.
SI was calculated with relative IC50 values of T.b. brucei and HEK293 cells. Value is described as “>” if the compound exhibited less than 50% activity at the top dose screened in the HEK293 assay at 75.8 µM, therefore an IC50 could not be estimated.
SI was calculated with relative IC50 values of T.b. rhodesiense, L. donovani, P. falciparum and T. cruzi to L6 cells.
The standard deviation was calculated from two experiments with one replicate in each for the T. cruzi, L. donovani and P. falciparum assays and from three experiments containing two replicates each for the T.b. brucei assay.
Compound activity against T. b. brucei and a panel of human infective protozoal species, including the HAT species T.b. rhodesiense of compounds identified from the T. b. brucei screening campaign. These compounds had the most favourable overall biological and medicinal chemistry profiles.
Figure 5Priority hit compounds with activity against T.b. brucei and T.b. rhodesiense.
Compound class and compound structures of the 6 priority hits identified from the T.b.brucei screening campaign, following screening against other protozoal species, medicinal chemistry analysis and consideration of optimal physiochemical properties.
Physicochemical properties of the top 6 hit compounds.
| Compound | mw | Calculated aqueous solubility (µM) | Polar Surface Area (A2) | cLogP |
| 1 | 306 | 63 | 42 | 3.4 |
| 2 | 328 | 8 | 71 | 2.9 |
| 3 | 353 | 25 | 39 | 4.8 |
| 6 | 270 | 3,160 | 81 | 2.0 |
| 7 | 339.5 | 0.025 | 81 | 2.6 |
| 8 | 380 | 32 | 67 | 3.1 |
Compound numbers refer to those outlined in Figure 5.
Figure 6Determination of the cidal activity of compounds 1, 2, 6 and 7 over 72 hours.
Death of T.b. brucei cells in wells estimated by parasite counts at 24, 48 and 72 hours following addition of the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of each compound. The positive control was puromycin.
Time to kill estimated by the IC50 values of compounds 1, 2, 6 and 7 over 72 hours.
| Compound | Activity (nM IC50 value) | |||
| 29 hours | 48 hours | 72 hours | AB | |
| 1 | 898±332 | 691±66.4 | 1030±18.4 | 1100±65.1 |
| 2 | 4840±449 | 3830±873 | 500±43.1 | 4710±272 |
| 6 | 3090±1380 | 177±11.0 | 111±50.2 | 160±40.3 |
| 7 | 178±7.00 | 142±38.7 | 220±17.6 | 198±1.28 |
| Puromycin | 152±65.4 | 58.1±10.1 | 68.6±0.283 | 64.1±0.240 |
| Pentamidine | 9.13±2.76 | 3.41±0.661 | 4.66±0.936 | 5.81±0.707 |
The IC50 values for each compound were determined at 29, 48 and 72 hours following the addition of compound by a Presto Blue-based assay, over 2 experiments. The IC50 was also determined for the Alamar Blue-based HTS assay format. The positive control was puromycin and the reference compounds were puromycin and pentamidine.
Compound numbers refer to those outlined in Figure 5.