Literature DB >> 23196672

Mapping the incidentalome: estimating incidental findings generated through clinical pharmacogenomics testing.

Matthew J Westbrook1, M Frances Wright, Sara L Van Driest, Tracy L McGregor, Joshua C Denny, Rebecca L Zuvich, Ellen Wright Clayton, Kyle B Brothers.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Greater clinical validity and economic feasibility are driving the more widespread use of multiplex genetic technologies in routine clinical care, especially for applications in pharmacogenomics. Empirical data on the numbers and types of incidental findings generated through such testing are needed to develop policies and practices related to their clinical use. Of particular importance are disparities in findings relevant to different ancestry groups.
METHODS: The Pharmacogenomic Resource for Enhanced Decisions in Care and Treatment Resource, or PREDICT, is an institutional program to implement prospective clinical genotyping of 34 pharmacogenomic-related genes to guide drug selection and dosing. We curated 5,566 journal articles to quantify and characterize the incidental, non-pharmacogenomic genotype-phenotype associations that could be generated through this clinical genotyping project.
RESULTS: We identified 372 putative incidental genotype-phenotype associations that might be revealed in patients undergoing clinical genotyping for pharmacogenomic purposes. Of these, 287 associations were supported by at least one study demonstrating an odds ratio ≥2.0 or ≤0.5. Numbers of potentially relevant findings varied widely by ancestry group.
CONCLUSION: Rigorous clinical policies for the clinical management of incidental findings are needed because the sheer number of significant findings could prove overwhelming to health-care institutions, providers, and patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23196672      PMCID: PMC3648626          DOI: 10.1038/gim.2012.147

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Med        ISSN: 1098-3600            Impact factor:   8.822


  27 in total

1.  Challenges in the clinical application of whole-genome sequencing.

Authors:  Kelly E Ormond; Matthew T Wheeler; Louanne Hudgins; Teri E Klein; Atul J Butte; Russ B Altman; Euan A Ashley; Henry T Greely
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2010-04-29       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  The incidentalome: a threat to genomic medicine.

Authors:  Isaac S Kohane; Daniel R Masys; Russ B Altman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-07-12       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Self-reported race and genetic admixture.

Authors:  Moumita Sinha; Emma K Larkin; Robert C Elston; Susan Redline
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2006-01-26       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Merging and emerging cohorts: necessary but not sufficient.

Authors:  Francis S Collins; Teri A Manolio
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-01-18       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support.

Authors:  Paul A Harris; Robert Taylor; Robert Thielke; Jonathon Payne; Nathaniel Gonzalez; Jose G Conde
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 6.317

6.  Next generation disparities in human genomics: concerns and remedies.

Authors:  Anna C Need; David B Goldstein
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 11.639

Review 7.  Priorities among effective clinical preventive services: results of a systematic review and analysis.

Authors:  Michael V Maciosek; Ashley B Coffield; Nichol M Edwards; Thomas J Flottemesch; Michael J Goodman; Leif I Solberg
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 5.043

8.  Public expectations for return of results from large-cohort genetic research.

Authors:  Juli Murphy; Joan Scott; David Kaufman; Gail Geller; Lisa LeRoy; Kathy Hudson
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 11.229

9.  Human genome epidemiology: translating advances in human genetics into population-based data for medicine and public health.

Authors:  M J Khoury
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  1999 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 8.822

10.  Exome sequencing: the expert view.

Authors:  Leslie G Biesecker; Kevin V Shianna; Jim C Mullikin
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2011-09-14       Impact factor: 13.583

View more
  16 in total

Review 1.  Return of individual research results and incidental findings: facing the challenges of translational science.

Authors:  Susan M Wolf
Journal:  Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet       Date:  2013-07-15       Impact factor: 8.929

2.  Ethical issues in pediatric pharmacogenomics.

Authors:  Kyle B Brothers
Journal:  J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2013-07

3.  Implementation of a clinical research pharmacogenomics program at an academic medical center: role of the genetics healthcare professional.

Authors:  Amy Curry Sturm; Kevin Sweet; Kandamurugu Manickam
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 2.533

4.  Teaching genomic counseling: preparing the genetic counseling workforce for the genomic era.

Authors:  Gillian W Hooker; Kelly E Ormond; Kevin Sweet; Barbara B Biesecker
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-02-08       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Evidence for extensive pleiotropy among pharmacogenes.

Authors:  Matthew T Oetjens; William S Bush; Joshua C Denny; Kelly Birdwell; Nuri Kodaman; Anurag Verma; Holli H Dilks; Sarah A Pendergrass; Marylyn D Ritchie; Dana C Crawford
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 2.533

Review 6.  Comparison of delivery strategies for pharmacogenetic testing services.

Authors:  Susanne B Haga; Jivan Moaddeb
Journal:  Pharmacogenet Genomics       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 2.089

7.  A framework for analyzing the ethics of disclosing genetic research findings.

Authors:  Lisa Eckstein; Jeremy R Garrett; Benjamin E Berkman
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 1.718

8.  Personalized sequencing and the future of medicine: discovery, diagnosis and defeat of disease.

Authors:  Edward D Esplin; Ling Oei; Michael P Snyder
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 2.533

9.  Implications of the incidentalome for clinical pharmacogenomics.

Authors:  Kyle B Brothers; Martin Langanke; Pia Erdmann
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 2.533

10.  Secondary use of clinical data: the Vanderbilt approach.

Authors:  Ioana Danciu; James D Cowan; Melissa Basford; Xiaoming Wang; Alexander Saip; Susan Osgood; Jana Shirey-Rice; Jacqueline Kirby; Paul A Harris
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2014-02-14       Impact factor: 6.317

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.