Literature DB >> 23193331

Impact of electronic device use in class on pharmacy students' academic performance.

William Allan Prescott1, Heather L Johnson, Mark J Wrobel, Gina M Prescott.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate and assess the impact of pharmacy students' electronic device (e-device) use during a lecture-based pharmacotherapeutics sequence.
METHODS: A validated survey instrument to assess e-device use was e-mailed to 238 second- (P2) and third-year (P3) pharmacy students. Grades were reviewed retrospectively and correlated with e-device use to determine its impact on academic performance.
RESULTS: Of 140 responding students (59% response rate), 106 reported using e-devices during class for course-related (91.5%) and non-course-related (81.1%) activities. When P2 and P3 students were combined, e-device use was not associated with academic performance (p = 0.70). Academic performance was not impacted among P3 students (p = 0.86), but P2 students performed better academically if they refrained from using e-devices during class (mean grade = 88.5% vs. 83.3%; p=0.019).
CONCLUSIONS: The impact of e-device use on overall academic performance was negligible. Use of e-devices by students enrolled in their first pharmacotherapeutics course may negatively impact academics.

Keywords:  electronic device; learning; student; technology

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23193331      PMCID: PMC3508481          DOI: 10.5688/ajpe769167

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ        ISSN: 0002-9459            Impact factor:   2.047


  9 in total

1.  Pharmacy student absenteeism and academic performance.

Authors:  Levita Hidayat; Sandeep Vansal; Esther Kim; Maureen Sullivan; Rebecca Salbu
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2012-02-10       Impact factor: 2.047

2.  Why we banned use of laptops and "scribe notes" in our classroom.

Authors:  Joseph L Fink
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2010-08-10       Impact factor: 2.047

3.  Use of laptops and other technology in the classroom.

Authors:  Alan R Spies
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2010-10-11       Impact factor: 2.047

4.  The use of wireless laptop computers for computer-assisted learning in pharmacokinetics.

Authors:  Myrna Y Munar; Harleen Singh; Donna Belle; Carolyn C Brackett; Sandra B Earle
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2006-02-15       Impact factor: 2.047

5.  What do dental students think about mandatory laptop programs?

Authors:  William Hendricson; Elise Eisenberg; Gary Guest; Pamela Jones; Lynn Johnson; Fotinos Panagakos; James McDonald; Laura Cintron
Journal:  J Dent Educ       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 2.264

6.  Connecting practice to evidence using laptop computers in the classroom.

Authors:  Kathy Lynn Rush
Journal:  Comput Inform Nurs       Date:  2008 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.985

7.  Mobile computing initiatives within pharmacy education.

Authors:  Jeff Cain; Eleanora R Bird; Mikael Jones
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2008-08-15       Impact factor: 2.047

8.  The challenge of educating in a highly-connected and multitasking world.

Authors:  Gayle A Brazeau; Daniel A Brazeau
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2009-11-12       Impact factor: 2.047

9.  Medical student learning in the preclinical curriculum: many steps behind a rapidly moving world.

Authors:  S Andrew Josephson; Daniel H Lowenstein
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 10.422

  9 in total
  1 in total

1.  The Effect of Banning Computers on Examination Performance in a First-Year Pathophysiology Class.

Authors:  Daniel R Kennedy
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 2.047

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.