Literature DB >> 32001887

The Effect of Banning Computers on Examination Performance in a First-Year Pathophysiology Class.

Daniel R Kennedy1,2.   

Abstract

Objective. To assess the effects of a computer-free classroom on first-year Doctor of Pharmacy (PharmD) students' performance in a pathophysiology course. Methods. In the 2018 course offering, the instructor enforced an electronics-free classroom where students could not access computers to take notes during lectures. Data were compared to a previous iteration of the course in which students could use computers for notetaking if they desired. Four in-class examinations were given by the instructor and performance between the two student classes were compared. Results. The average examination grade increased 3% in the electronics-free classroom. Overall, final course grades were similar for students receiving A's and B's, but there was a notable increase in C's and a corresponding decrease in course failures. Course evaluations remained consistent and a slight majority of student comments were supportive of the computer-free environment. Conclusion. Student performance on examinations and in the course improved within the electronics-free classroom, especially for students at the lower end of the grading scale. This work provides important insights for faculty and administrators as they weigh whether to create a computer-free learning environment.
© 2019 American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy.

Keywords:  biological sciences; computer ban; electronics in classroom; pathophysiology

Year:  2019        PMID: 32001887      PMCID: PMC6983878          DOI: 10.5688/ajpe7535

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ        ISSN: 0002-9459            Impact factor:   2.047


  10 in total

1.  Use of laptops and other technology in the classroom.

Authors:  Alan R Spies
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2010-10-11       Impact factor: 2.047

2.  Multi-faceted approach to improve learning in pharmacokinetics.

Authors:  Adam M Persky
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2008-04-15       Impact factor: 2.047

3.  In reply to "why we banned use of laptops and 'scribe notes' in our classroom".

Authors:  Roger Wright; Paul J Perry; Keith Yoshizuka
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2011-03-10       Impact factor: 2.047

4.  Active-learning processes used in US pharmacy education.

Authors:  David W Stewart; Stacy D Brown; Cheri W Clavier; Jarrett Wyatt
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2011-05-10       Impact factor: 2.047

5.  Comparison of Introductory Pharmacy Practice Experiences Among US Pharmacy Programs.

Authors:  Christine N Galinski; Patricia J Horosz; Joshua J Spooner; Daniel R Kennedy
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2014-11-15       Impact factor: 2.047

6.  Process-oriented guided inquiry learning strategy enhances students' higher level thinking skills in a pharmaceutical sciences course.

Authors:  Robert Soltis; Nathan Verlinden; Nicholas Kruger; Ailey Carroll; Tiffany Trumbo
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 2.047

7.  Redesigning a Pharmacology Course to Promote Active Learning.

Authors:  Daniel R Kennedy
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 2.047

8.  Impact of electronic device use in class on pharmacy students' academic performance.

Authors:  William Allan Prescott; Heather L Johnson; Mark J Wrobel; Gina M Prescott
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2012-11-12       Impact factor: 2.047

9.  The pen is mightier than the keyboard: advantages of longhand over laptop note taking.

Authors:  Pam A Mueller; Daniel M Oppenheimer
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2014-04-23

10.  An Elective Course to Foster Interest in Academic Pharmacy Career Opportunities.

Authors:  Joshua J Spooner; Daniel R Kennedy
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2017-02-25       Impact factor: 2.047

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.