Rediscovering trazodone for the treatment of major depressive disorder.

Trazodone is a triazolopyridine derivative that belongs to the class of serotonin receptor antagonists and reuptake inhibitors (SARIs). The drug is approved and marketed in several countries worldwide for the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD) in adult patients. In clinical studies, trazodone has demonstrated comparable antidepressant activity to other drug classes, including tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs), selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and serotonin-noradrenaline (norepinephrine) reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs). Moreover, the SARI action of trazodone may overcome the tolerability issues that are often associated with second-generation antidepressants such as SSRIs (i.e. insomnia, anxiety and sexual dysfunction). Recent focus has been placed on the development of a new prolonged-release once-a-day formulation of trazodone (TzCOAD), which may provide improved tolerability over the conventional immediate-release formulation of trazodone. Clinical studies have led to the recent approval in the USA of TzCOAD (as Oleptro™; Angelini Labopharm LLC, Princeton, NJ, USA), which may see resurgence of interest in the drug for the management of patients with MDD. Although trazodone is approved for the treatment of depression, evidence supports the use of low-dose trazodone as an off-label hypnotic for the treatment of sleep disorders in patients with MDD. The most common adverse effects reported with trazodone are drowsiness (somnolence/sedation), headache, dizziness and dry mouth. Other events reported, albeit with low incidence, include orthostatic hypotension (particularly in elderly patients or those with heart disease), minimal anticholinergic activity, corrected QT interval prolongation and torsade de pointes, cardiac arrhythmias, and rare occurrences of priapism and suicidal ideation. Overall, trazodone is an effective and well tolerated antidepressant (SARI) with an important role in the current treatment of MDD both as monotherapy and as part of a combination strategy. Trazodone is effective in controlling a wide range of symptoms of depression, while avoiding the negative effects on sleep seen with SSRI antidepressants. The recently approved prolonged-release formulation should provide further optimization of this antidepressant and may be useful for enabling an appropriate therapeutic dose to be administered with improved patient compliance.

Introduction

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a common mental disorder that affects approximately 121 million people worldwide, and is among the leading causes of disability and disease burden [1]. In primary care, MDD can be reliably diagnosed and international treatment guidelines along with various algorithms are available to guide physicians in the treatment process [2]. Despite the availability of antidepressant pharmacotherapies that could provide effective and well tolerated treatment to many patients, fewer than 25 % of individuals with MDD receive adequate treatment [1, 3].

According to current treatment guidelines, the main goals of treatment for MDD include the achievement of symptomatic remission and function recovery [4-8]; however, suboptimal treatment prevents the achievement of these goals [9]. In general, the first-line treatment of moderate or severe MDD includes antidepressant monotherapy, evidence-based psychotherapy and/or a combination of both approaches [4-8]. Patients with severe MDD may require the combination of an antidepressant with an antipsychotic agent, electroconvulsive therapy or a combination of antidepressant(s) with psychotherapy [4-8]. Furthermore, treatment strategies for patients who have not responded adequately to first-line therapy include switching to a different monotherapy, combination therapy with another antidepressant or augmentation with a different agent [6].

Over 20 years has passed since the introduction of the last major class of antidepressant medications, the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), which are now widely available. SSRIs and their derivative compounds, the serotonin-noradrenaline (norepinephrine) reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) and noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors (NERIs), have since been shown to be comparable in efficacy and more tolerable than older agents such as tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) and monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs) [10]. However, significant therapeutic limitations exist, including modest remission rates, often <50 % for both SSRIs and SNRIs [11], a relatively slow onset of efficacy [12] and variable efficacy across the spectrum of depressive symptoms [13]. Furthermore, adverse effects are common, including sexual dysfunction [14], weight gain/loss [15], insomnia/daytime sleepiness [16-18] and anxiety or nervousness [17].

Trazodone is a serotonin antagonist and reuptake inhibitor (SARI) that has been available for the treatment of MDD with or without anxiety since the early 1970s [19]. The agent is generally well tolerated, with fewer anticholinergic effects than imipramine and amitriptyline and has comparable antidepressant efficacy to other second-generation antidepressants [20]. Other marketed SARIs include other phenylpiperazine antidepressant/anxiolytic agents, etoperidone, lorpiprazole and mepiprazole.

Trazodone is available in many countries worldwide in different formulations including immediate-release (IR) tablets, prolonged-release tablets and, in some countries, even as oral drops and solution for injection.

A novel, prolonged-release, once-a-day formulation of trazodone (150- and 300-mg bisectable tablets), utilizing Contramid® (Angelini Labopharm LLC, Princeton, NJ, USA) drug-delivery technology (trazodone Contramid® once-a day [TzCOAD]), has been recently developed. This proprietary delivery technology is able to control the release of trazodone over 24 h and was developed in an attempt to enhance patient compliance to therapy without a loss in efficacy and to improve tolerability by avoiding the early high peak plasma concentration seen with conventional IR formulations. TzCOAD was approved in the USA in early 2010 for the treatment of patients with MDD (Oleptro™; Angelini Labopharm LLC) and it is undergoing approval in many European countries [21].

Due to its combined serotoninergic receptor antagonism and serotonin reuptake inhibition (SARI), trazodone has also demonstrated unique therapeutic flexibility [22], which has given rise to its potential use in a broad range of co-morbidities associated with MDD as well as off-label indications, including insomnia, anxiety, dementia, Alzheimer’s disease, substance abuse, schizophrenia, bulimia and fibromyalgia.

The aim of the current publication is to review the more recent clinical data for trazodone in MDD, focusing on the approved dose of 300 mg/day, and to discuss its place in current treatment strategies for MDD and related conditions and for off-label indications insomnia and anxiety.

A literature search was conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE using the following keywords: ‘trazodone’ and ‘major depressive disorder’ as free text. The search was limited to fully published, randomized controlled trials, English-language only. Each paper was assessed for relevance, and only articles published after 1981 (US approval date) were included. Separate searches were conducted for the use of trazodone in other indications including insomnia and anxiety. Again, only fully published, randomized controlled trials were included.

Mechanisms of Action and Pharmacological Properties of Trazodone

Trazodone is a triazolopyridine derivative (Fig. 1) [23]. Although its pharmacological actions in humans are not fully understood, trazodone is thought to have more than one mechanism of therapeutic action, making it a multifunctional drug [22].

Fig. 1

Structural formula of trazodone

Trazodone: A Serotonin Receptor Antagonist and Reuptake Inhibitor (SARI) Antidepressant

Trazodone is the first antidepressant with a dual mechanism of action involving inhibition of the serotonin transporter (SERT) and serotonin type 2 (5-HT2) receptor antagonism (both the 5-HT2A and 5-HT2C receptors) [22]. Preclinical evidence suggests that the antidepressant activity of SSRIs and SNRIs is most likely through blockade of the SERT, which results in serotonin exerting its agonistic actions on the 5-HT1A receptor [24, 25]. However, this agonistic effect of serotonin also acts on other serotonin receptor subtypes such as the 5-HT2A and 5-HT2C receptors, which are thought to be responsible for the adverse effects often associated with SSRI and SNRI therapy, including insomnia, sexual dysfunction and anxiety [22]. Unlike SSRIs and SNRIs, SARIs such as trazodone provide simultaneous inhibition of SERT and 5-HT2A and 5-HT2C receptor antagonism, thus avoiding the tolerability issues often associated with 5-HT2A/2C stimulation. Furthermore, there have been suggestions that simultaneous 5-HT2A/2C antagonism and SERT inhibition may have a synergistic effect that potentiates the antidepressant activity of SARIs and may improve treatment tolerability [22, 24–28].

Moreover, trazodone exerts antagonistic properties against α1- and α2-adrenergic receptors and histamine H1 receptors, with minimal anticholinergic effects. It is also well known that at low doses (25–100 mg), trazodone has therapeutic activity as a hypnotic [9, 22]. The actions of several neurotransmitter systems, including serotonin, noradrenaline, dopamine, acetylcholine and histamine, are known to be involved in arousal mechanism [25, 29, 30]. Therefore, arousal can be effectively impaired and sleep induced by inhibiting several of these neurotransmitter systems. The efficacy of trazodone in this regard may be explained by its ability to inhibit H1 receptors, and the sleep-inducing effect of H1 receptor blockade may be enhanced by simultaneous 5-HT2A and α-adrenergic receptor antagonism [25, 29, 30].

Dosage and Administration

According to the appropriate trazodone summary of product characteristics (SPC) [31-33], therapy should begin with an evening administration (starting dose 75–150 mg before bedtime). Subsequently, the dose can be increased every 3 days up to 300 mg/day, to be administered in repeated doses after meals (trazodone IR), two times a day (trazodone prolonged release) or once a day, preferably at bedtime (TzCOAD). In hospitalized patients the dose may be further increased up to 600 mg/day in repeated doses. For elderly patients, the starting dose should be reduced to 100 mg/day.

Prolonged-Release Formulations

A prolonged-release tablet formulation of trazodone (Roussel Laboratories Ltd., Guildford, UK) [75- and 150-mg tablets] was developed in the 1980s to limit the early and relatively high peak plasma drug concentrations that are seen with the IR tablets. This high peak plasma concentration may be associated with the occurrence of adverse effects such as somnolence or hypotension, especially during the first week of treatment. These adverse effects might limit the treatment tolerability and compliance, thus limiting the use of a therapeutic dose (up to 300 mg/day) in patients with depression [34].

As reported in the SPC, after a single oral dose of 100 mg of trazodone IR, a maximum plasma drug concentration (Cmax) of 1.2 μg/mL is reached with a time to reach maximum plasma concentration (tmax) of 1 h [32]. For trazodone prolonged release, after a single oral dose of 75 mg, a Cmax of around 0.7 μg/mL is reached, with a tmax of 4 h [31]. After a single oral dose of 150 mg of trazodone prolonged release, a Cmax of around 1.2 μg/mL is reached with a tmax at 4 h after administration [31]. The half-life is approximately 12 h [31].

The elimination half-life of trazodone IR is relatively short (6.6 h after a single 100-mg dose), therefore, repeated daily administrations are often used in order to achieve a sufficient dose level for MDD patients, but such a dosing regimen can be inconvenient, and can lead to missed doses and reduced compliance.

More recently, a new once-a-day, prolonged-release formulation of trazodone (TzCOAD, Oleptro™) was developed with the aim of further enhancing treatment compliance at therapeutic doses, and reducing the plasma peak concentration and dosing frequency compared with the conventional IR formulation [35]. TzCOAD was developed in two strengths (150- and 300-mg scored tablets) in order to allow for proper titration starting from 150 mg/day, with 75 mg increments every 3 days.

Traditional Role of Trazodone in the Treatment of Major Depressive Disorder (MDD)

Since the approval of trazodone, the drug has demonstrated comparable antidepressant activity to other drug classes such as TCAs, SSRIs and SNRIs in several clinical studies [36]. As a result, trazodone may be administered as monotherapy or in combination with other antidepressant medications for the treatment of MDD [4].

Despite its established efficacy and popularity as an antidepressant in the USA during the 1980s, current treatment guidelines state that trazodone IR is now more likely to be used at lower doses as a sedative-hypnotic rather than as an antidepressant in the USA [4]. However, there are limited clinical data to support the use of trazodone for this indication and trazodone continues to be approved solely for the treatment of MDD in the USA and the majority of countries worldwide.

Over the last few years, focus has been placed on the development of the new prolonged-release, once-a-day formulation of trazodone, with the aim to optimize its antidepressant efficacy, and improve the treatment schedule and compliance in MDD patients.

Due to its multifunctional pharmacology, appropriate dosing is indeed crucial to optimize clinical efficacy in patients with MDD.

Efficacy and Tolerability of Trazodone in MDD

Several head-to-head studies have demonstrated the comparable antidepressant efficacy between trazodone and other drug classes, including TCAs (amitriptyline and imipramine), SSRIs (fluoxetine, paroxetine, sertraline, citalopram and escitalopram), SNRIs (venlafaxine and mirtazapine) and noradrenaline and dopamine reuptake inhibitors (bupropion). Randomized, controlled clinical trials of trazodone in non-elderly adults with MDD published from 1981 are summarized in Table 1 [37-50].

Table 1

Summary of randomized, controlled clinical trials of trazodone in adults with major depressive disorder published since 1981

Reference (year)	Study design	Study population (N)	Treatment daily dosage, mg/day (N)	Active treatment duration	Endpoints	Efficacy results
Blacker et al. [46] (1988)	Randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, multi-centre	DSM-III-defined major depression, GP patients (N = 227)	Trazodone 150 (N = 112) Recommended dosages of mianserin 30–60 (N = 36), dothiepin 75–150 (N = 35) and amitriptyline 75–100 (N = 44)	6 weeks	Efficacy: HAM-D, global severity and improvement Safety: total AE score	No significant differences in efficacy endpoints between treatment groups
Davey [48] (1988)	Randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, multi-centre	DSM-III-defined major depression, GP patients (N = 182)	Trazodone nocte 150 (N = 95) Trazodone nocte 50 tid (N = 87)	6 weeks	Efficacy: HAM-D, global severity and improvement Safety: total AE score	No significant differences in efficacy endpoints between treatment groups
Debus et al. [49] (1988)	Randomized, double-blind, parallel-group	DSM-III-defined major depression, HAM-D score ≥20, outpatients (N = 43)	Trazodone 50–400 tid (N = 17) Fluoxetine 20–60 tid (N = 18)	6 weeks	Efficacy: HAM-D response rate (HAM-D < 10 or ≥50 % reduction in HAM-D), IDS-C	HAM-D scores significantly lower at weeks 1 and 2 with fluoxetine vs. trazodone Trazodone improved HAM-D sleep subscale score significantly more than fluoxetine (p = 0.001)
Moon and Davey [50] (1988)	Randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, single-centre	DSM-III-defined major depression, GP patients (N = 39)	Trazodone nocte 150 (N = 19) Mianserin nocte 30–60 (N = 20)	6 weeks	Efficacy: HAM-D, global severity and improvement	No significant differences in efficacy endpoints between treatment groups
Botros et al. [47] (1989)	Randomized, double-blind, parallel-group	Depression [≥17 HAM-D score] (N = 20)	Trazodone 50–400 (N = 10) Amitriptyline 25–200 (N = 10)	3 weeks	Efficacy: MADRS, SAD, NDS, overall severity of illness scale	No difference in onset of antidepressant or anxiolytic action between treatment groups
Moon et al. [40] (1990)	Randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, multi-centre	DSM-III-defined MDD (N = 247)	Controlled-release trazodone 150 (N = 172) Standard trazodone 150 (N = 175)	6 weeks	Efficacy: Global severity; global improvement; HAM-D 17- and 21-item Safety: AEs assessed by a checklist of 5 symptoms (dizziness, drowsiness, dry mouth, headache and nausea), an open question, and spontaneous comments	No statistically significant differences between treatment groups in any efficacy measure
Beasley et al. [37] (1991)	Randomized, double-blind	DSM-III-defined MDD (N = 126)	Trazodone 250 (N = 61) Fluoxetine 20 (N = 65)	6 weeks	Efficacy: HAM-D 21-item; CGI-S; PGI-I; Guild Memory Test Safety: AEs reported included those related to activation or sedation; discontinuation due to activating/sedating effects	No statistically significant differences between treatment groups with respect to mean HAM-D21 improvement
Cunningham et al [38] (1994)	Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-centre	DSM-III-R-defined MDD (N = 225)	Trazodone 50–300 (N = 77) Venlafaxine 25–150 (N = 72) Placebo (N = 76)	6 weeks; responders continued double-blind treatment for 12 months	Efficacy: HAM-D; MADRS; CGI Safety: AEs; physical, laboratory and ECG examinations	Both active treatments were significantly more effective than placebo, but venlafaxine produced more improvement in cognitive disturbance and retardation factors. Trazodone was more effective against the sleep disturbance factor
Weisler et al. [45] (1994)	Randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, multi-centre	DSM-III-defined moderate-to-severe MDD (N = 124)	Trazodone 150–400 (N = 61) Bupropion 225–450 (N = 63)	6 weeks	Efficacy: HAM-D 21-item; CGI-S; CGI-I; HAM-A Safety: treatment-emergent AEs	The overall efficacy of the two drugs was similar; improvement with trazodone was significantly greater on day 7 because of effects on sleep; 58 % of the bupropion-treated patients and 46 % of the trazodone-treated patients were much/very much improved
Van Moffaert et al. [44] (1995)	Randomized, double-blind, multi-centre	DSM-III-defined MDD (N = 200)	Trazodone 150–450 (N = 100) Mirtazapine 24–72 (N = 100)	6 weeks	Efficacy: HAM-D 17-item; MADRS; BPRS; BDI, GAS Safety: AEs; laboratory and ECG examinations; BP, HR, bodyweight	Improvement was generally greater for mirtazapine, with statistically significant differences vs. trazodone in HAM-D total and Bech melancholia and retardation subscores, BPRS total score, GAS and BDI scores and responder rates
Kasper et al. [39] (2005)	Randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, multi-centre	DSM-IV-defined MDD (N = 108)	Trazodone prolonged-release 150–450 bid (N = 55) Paroxetine 20–40 (N = 53)	6 weeks	Efficacy: CGIS-S; CGI-GI; HAM-D 17-item; MADRS; response rates (patients with 50 % improvement from baseline in HAM-D and/or MADRS); remission rates (patients with HAM-D score ≤7); onset time of efficacy (the visit where a 50 % improvement in HAM-D and/or MADRS was observed) Safety: AEs	No significant differences between the groups at endpoint in efficacy measures, responder or remission rates. Sleep disorders were significantly less evident with trazodone (p < 0.05)
Munizza et al. [41] (2006)	Randomized, double-blind, multi-centre	DSM-IV-defined MDD (N = 122)	Trazodone prolonged-release 150–450 bid (N = 62) Sertraline 50–100 (N = 60)	6 weeks	HAM-D 17-item; HAM-A; MADRS; CGI-S; CGI-GI; analysis of HAM-D factors; response rates (patients with 50 % improvement from baseline in HAM-D and/or MADRS and/or CGI-GI score of 1 or 2); onset time of efficacy (the visit where a 50 % improvement in HAM-D and/or MADRS was observed)	Trazodone and sertraline were equally effective in reducing depressive symptoms and promoting remission, and had similar onset times. Sleep disturbances were significantly less evident for patients taking trazodone
					Safety: AEs; overall clinical tolerability rated on a 5-point scale (very poor to very good) at final visit
Sheehan et al [42]. (2009)	Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-centre	DSM-IV-defined MDD (N = 412)	TzCOAD 150–375 (N = 206) Placebo (N = 206)	6 weeks	Efficacy: HAM-D 17-item; HAM-D-17 responders (patients with 50 % improvement from baseline in HAM-D-17 total score ≤7); HAM-D-17 remitters (patients with HAM-D-17 score of ≤7) CGI-I; CGI-S; PGI-I; quality of sleep Safety: AEs; bodyweight; laboratory, physical and ECG examinations; concomitant medications	There was a statistically significant difference between trazodone and placebo in mean HAM-D-17 score (−11.4 vs. −9.3, p = 0.012)
Sheehan et al. [43] (2009)	Standard effect size analysis of a previously published randomized study	DSM-IV-defined MDD (N = 412)	TzCOAD 150–375 (N = 206) Placebo (N = 206)	6 weeks	Efficacy: Cohen’s d analysis on the modified ITT population to determine which items of the HAM-D 17-item and the MADRS showed the greatest improvement Safety: Not assessed	No significant interaction between improvements in the HAM-D Bech-6 core symptoms of depression and baseline MADRS reduced sleep item or early changes in the HAM-D-17 sleep disturbance factor

AE adverse events, BDI Beck Depression Inventory, bid twice daily, BP blood pressure, BPRS Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale, CGI Clinical Global Impressions Scale, CGI-GI Clinical Global Impressions Scale for Global Improvement, CGI-I Clinical Global Impressions Scale for Improvement, CGI-S Clinical Global Impressions Scale for Severity, GAS General Psychiatric Impression Global Assessment Scale, GP general practice, HAM-A Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety, HAM-D Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression, HR heart rate, IDS-C Inventory for Depressive symptomatology—Clinician Version; ITT intent-to-treat, MADRS Montgomery Åsberg Depression Rating Scale, MDD major depressive disorder, NDS Newcastle Diagnostic Scale, PGI-I Patient Global Impressions Scale for Improvement, SAD States of Anxiety and Depression scale; tid three times daily; TzCOAD trazodone Contramid® once-a-day

Trazodone Versus Tricyclic Antidepressants (TCAs)

In a number of comparative trials conducted in the 1980s, short-term therapy (4–6 weeks) with trazodone (100–400 mg) appeared to be comparable in efficacy to TCAs such as amitriptyline and imipramine [51-53]. An early randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of geriatric patients with unipolar depression demonstrated that the therapeutic efficacy of trazodone was superior to placebo and comparable to imipramine after 4 weeks of treatment [53]. A double-blind, randomized study of trazodone in elderly patients with major depression reported significant improvements in the total Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) and Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) scores, which were similar to outcomes seen in patients treated with amitriptyline and mianserin [51]. Furthermore, HAM-D and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores were similar between trazodone and amitriptyline in a study of elderly patients with depression [52].

Trazodone Versus Second-Generation Antidepressants

Several head-to-head trials have been conducted between trazodone (dose range 150–450 mg) and second-generation antidepressants in patients with MDD. An analysis of head-to-head trials comparing various second-generation antidepressants showed that the relative benefit, in terms of response, was comparable between trazodone and other second-generation antidepressants, including SSRIs, SNRIs and bupropion [20].

A small study (n = 27) comparing the antidepressant efficacy and safety of trazodone and the SSRI fluoxetine in geriatric patients with depression reported similar improvements in HAM-D scores after 6 weeks of treatment [54]. Significant improvements from baseline in HAM-D scores were also seen with trazodone IR (dose range 50–400 mg/day) and fluoxetine (dose range 20–40 mg/day) in a larger randomized, double-blind study (n = 126) of outpatients with MDD—these improvements in clinical efficacy were similar between the two treatment groups, but HAM-D sleep disturbance scores improved significantly more in the trazodone group than in the fluoxetine group (−2.7 vs. 1.6; p = 0.001) [37].

More recently, two similar European multicentre, double-blind, randomized trials compared the trazodone prolonged-release twice-daily formulation with paroxetine [39] and sertraline [41] in patients with MDD. Efficacy was assessed by the measurement of changes from baseline in HAM-D, Montgomery Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) and Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) scores after 6 weeks of treatment. The results of these two studies indicated that trazodone prolonged release was as effective as paroxetine and sertraline in reducing depressive symptoms and promoting remission; trazodone may also have advantages for patients with major depression who have sleeping difficulties or show prevalent sleep disturbances [39, 41].

The efficacy of SNRI venlafaxine was compared with that of trazodone IR in a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of 225 patients with MDD [38]. In general, both trazodone (dose range 150–400 mg/day following the titration phase) and venlafaxine (dose range 75–200 mg/day) were significantly more effective than placebo according to changes in HAM-D scores. However, trazodone was associated with a greater improvement in the HAM-D-related sleep disturbance factor than venlafaxine, whereas greater improvements in cognitive disturbance and retardation factors were seen with venlafaxine [38].

In contrast to these findings, a double-blind, randomized study of patients with moderate-to-severe MDD demonstrated that the SNRI mirtazapine was associated with greater improvements in HAM-D scores compared with trazodone after 6 weeks of treatment [44].

Trazodone was compared with the noradrenaline and dopamine reuptake inhibitor bupropion in a double-blind, randomized trial of outpatients with moderate-to-severe MDD [45]. After 6 weeks, overall efficacy according to HAM-D and CGI-S scores was similar between the trazodone IR and bupropion groups. However, improvements in HAM-D and CGI-S scores on day 7 were significantly greater with trazodone versus bupropion due to the beneficial effects on sleep with trazodone. At the end of treatment, 46 % and 58 % of patients were considered to be much/very much improved in the trazodone and bupropion groups, respectively [45].

Trazodone Prolonged-Release Formulations

The prolonged-release formulation (Roussel Laboratories Ltd.) was compared with standard trazodone IR in a double-blind, randomized study of 347 general practice patients with MDD [40]. After 6 weeks of treatment (150 mg/day given at bedtime for both treatment arms), significant improvements from baseline in global severity, global improvement and HAM-D scores were seen in both treatment groups. The difference of these improvements was not statistically significant between trazodone prolonged release and trazodone IR, but small treatment differences in efficacy measures favoured patients who received trazodone prolonged release. Safety, tolerability and compliance did not differ significantly between the two treatment arms, demonstrating that the new formulation was effective and safe [40].

The efficacy and safety of TzCOAD was evaluated in a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study in 412 patients with MDD (6 weeks’ treatment, dose range from 150 to 375 mg/day). The mean maximum daily dose of TzCOAD administered during the study was 310 mg [42]. The improvement in HAM-D scores were significantly greater with TzCOAD than with placebo—this difference was already statistically significant after the first week of treatment and was maintained throughout the study [42]. Moreover, there was a higher percentage of HAMD-17 responders and a greater decrease in the change from baseline in the HAMD-17 depressed-mood item, CGI-S and MADRS total score. HAM-D items with the greatest improvement were insomnia items, feelings of guilt and depressed mood, while in the MADRS, the greatest improvement was seen in reduced sleep, inner tension, reported sadness and suicidal thoughts. Notably, the antidepressant efficacy of TzCOAD was independent of the baseline severity of insomnia and of the improvement in insomnia. TzCOAD was also well tolerated; the most frequent adverse events were headache and somnolence. There were no serious treatment-related adverse events or clinically significant ECG or laboratory abnormalities [43]. These results suggest that TzCOAD—the prolonged-release, once-a-day formulation of trazodone—may be an effective monotherapy option in patients with MDD, when given at the appropriate therapeutic dose (up to 375 mg/day).

Trazodone in Special Patient Populations

Trazodone has undergone investigation for the treatment of MDD in various patient populations, including the elderly, paediatric patients and those with renal impairment.

In elderly patients with MDD, comparable efficacy was reported between trazodone and the TCA amitriptyline [51]. Two double-blind, randomized studies comparing trazodone and the SSRI fluoxetine also reported similar antidepressant efficacy between the two study treatments [37, 54]. Furthermore, fluoxetine was associated with a higher incidence of activating adverse effects (agitation, anxiety, nervousness, insomnia), compared with trazodone [37]. In contrast, sedating effects were more commonly reported with trazodone therapy versus fluoxetine [37].

Trazodone prolonged-release (Roussel Laboratories Ltd.) was evaluated in elderly patients with depression [55]. After 4 weeks of treatment, both controlled-release and conventional formulations of trazodone (both given at night-time as single daily doses starting at 100 mg and increased to 200 mg/day based on tolerability) were similar in efficacy, as measured by changes from baseline in HAM-D and global assessments of the severity of depression scale scores [55]. Fewer adverse effects were reported during the first week of treatment in patients receiving the controlled-release formulation.

Patients often experience their first episode of MDD during early childhood, prior to puberty or adolescence [56]. To date, there are no data on the use of trazodone in children and adolescents with MDD. In a small open-label study of ten children with chronic tic and Tourette’s syndrome, the combination of haloperidol and trazodone was shown to improve clinical symptoms effectively [57]. At study end, the Yale Global Tic Severity Scale score was significantly reduced from baseline, and no adverse effects were reported. However, it should be noted that trazodone is not recommended in children below the age of 18 years.

Trazodone is extensively metabolized in the liver, but the effects of trazodone in patients with renal or hepatic impairment have not been well studied. An early study conducted in the late 1970s assessed the effects of 12 days’ treatment with trazodone (75 mg) in patients with mixed neuroses and normal or impaired renal function [58]. Although higher serum concentrations of trazodone were observed in patients with renal impairment, compared to those with normal renal function, these differences were not statistically significant [58]. As a result, the authors concluded that renal impairment is not a contraindication of treatment with low-dose trazodone [58]. A recent case of severe liver toxicity resulting in fulminant hepatic failure has been reported following treatment with venlafaxine and trazodone for 4 months [59].

Given the available data on the use of trazodone in patients with renal or hepatic impairment, trazodone product labelling advises careful dosing and regular monitoring in patients with hepatic impairment, particularly in cases of severe hepatic impairment, and severe renal impairment (usually, no dosage adjustment is necessary for mild to moderate renal impairment) [31-33].

Tolerability of Trazodone

Trazodone is generally well tolerated for the treatment of MDD, with the most common adverse effects being drowsiness (somnolence/sedation), headache, dizziness and dry mouth [4].

Drowsiness is the most common adverse effect of trazodone, with a reported incidence in depressed patients ranging from 5.6 % to 22.5 % (latter estimated from figure) [60, 61].

Trazodone has minimal anticholinergic activity [62]. However, an increased risk of orthostatic hypotension may be associated with trazodone, particularly in elderly patients or those with pre-existing heart disease [4]. This effect, due to adrenergic α1-receptor blockade, is transient and related to plasma drug concentration [63].

At toxic plasma concentrations, trazodone may be associated with prolongation of the corrected QT interval (QTc) and torsade de pointes [64]. Even with therapeutic doses, several cases of life-threatening cardiac arrhythmias, including ventricular tachycardia [65-67] have been reported in clinical and preclinical studies [68]. Data suggest that prolongation of the QT interval is related to the interaction of trazodone with hERG potassium channels [62, 69]. Concomitant use of trazodone with drugs known to exert cardiac toxicity or to prolong the QT interval should be avoided, because it could increase the risk of ventricular arrhythmias, including torsade de pointes.

Trazodone may also be associated with rare occurrences of priapism [70-72]. For this reason, trazodone should be used with caution in men who have conditions that might predispose them to priapism (e.g. sickle cell anaemia, multiple myeloma, leukaemia, autonomic nervous system dysfunctions and hypercoagulable states), or in men with anatomical deformation of the penis (e.g. angulation, cavernosal fibrosis or Peyronie’s disease) [21].

Drug interactions have been reported with cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 enzyme inhibitors, such as erythromycin, ketoconazole and ritonavir, leading to increased plasma concentration of trazodone; conversely, carbamazepine may reduce trazodone plasma concentrations. Concurrent administration with other antidepressant drugs such as TCAs, MAOs or fluoxetine should be avoided due to the risk of developing serotonin syndrome and cardiovascular adverse effects [31]. The interaction between trazodone, citalopram and fluoxetine was studied in 97 patients with depressive syndrome over a 1-year period [73]. Results showed that the use of citalopram and fluoxetine in combination with trazodone had no significant impact on trazodone serum concentrations and no cases of headache, daytime sedation, fatigue or serotonin syndrome were reported during the study.

Antidepressants increase the risk compared with placebo of suicidal thinking and behaviour (suicidality) in children, adolescents and young adults in short-term studies of MDD and other psychiatric disorders [21]. Cases of suicidal ideation and suicidal behaviours have been reported during trazodone therapy or early after treatment discontinuation [31].

‘Real-World’ and Long-Term Data for Trazodone

Only one study was found to have assessed the use of trazodone in a ‘real-world’ clinical setting. A semi-naturalistic study evaluating the addition of trazodone to existing venlafaxine treatment reported improved MADRS scores in 50 depressed patients with insomnia [74].

Despite the availability of trazodone for approximately 40 years, long-term efficacy data on its use in MDD and from studies directly assessing the quality of life of trazodone appear to be lacking.

The efficacy and safety of long-term therapy with trazodone IR or imipramine was evaluated in a double-blind, randomized study of 44 outpatients with depression [75]. After 12 months of treatment, trazodone was well tolerated and was associated with significantly greater improvements in HAM-D and CGI scores. Furthermore, a continued clinical benefit was seen in 12 patients who had received open-label trazodone for up to 3 years [75]. In a second double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study, the safety and efficacy of trazodone IR and venlafaxine was evaluated in patients with MDD. Of the 149 patients who completed the initial 6-week treatment phase, 96 were classified as clinical responders (CGI score of 1 or 2) and entered a 1-year, double-blind extension phase [38]. Although no efficacy results were reported during the extension phase, a higher proportion of venlafaxine-treated patients entered the extension phase, compared with trazodone IR- and placebo-treated patients (51 % vs. 39 % and 38 %, respectively) [38]. Furthermore, the rate of treatment discontinuation for any reason was significantly lower with venlafaxine versus trazodone IR, but no significant differences were seen in discontinuations due to adverse effects.

Based on the limited data available, trazodone may be effective and generally well tolerated in the ‘real-world’ setting. However, larger controlled studies with a long-term follow-up are required to confirm these findings.

Use of Trazodone in Other Psychiatric Disorders

In most of the countries where it is marketed, trazodone has only been approved for the treatment of patients with MDD, but this medication has frequently been used for a broad spectrum of psychiatric disorders. As previously described, the pharmacological properties of trazodone are unique among antidepressants, with its mixed serotonergic and adrenolytic activity making trazodone an attractive off-label treatment option for multiple disorders, including insomnia, anxiety, behavioural disorders associated with dementia and Alzheimer’s disease, substance abuse, schizophrenia, eating disorders and fibromyalgia [76].

However, the most frequent off-label use of trazodone is the treatment of insomnia in patients with or without depression [22].

Insomnia

Insomnia incidence and its medical importance is often underestimated, especially in the elderly population, in which it is associated with a significant increase in morbidity and mortality, as well as with an increase in admission to nursing homes [77].

Trazodone is widely used in insomnia in place of benzodiazepines, due its anxiolytic action and its ability to normalize sleep patterns, as demonstrated in depressed patients [43, 78, 79].

Consequently, the off-label use of trazodone for the treatment of primary or secondary insomnia is currently the most frequent reason for its prescription in the USA [22], where trazodone is the second-most commonly prescribed agent for treating insomnia [80]. At doses lower than those used for the treatment of depression, the hypnotic action of trazodone is thought to be attributed primarily to antagonism of 5-HT2A receptors, H1 receptors and α1-adrenergic receptors [22].

Table 2 summarizes clinical trials of trazodone that reported sleep endpoints in patients with or without depression. Early clinical studies demonstrated the potential use of trazodone as a treatment option for insomnia [81, 82]. The effectiveness of trazodone was further established in the 1990s both in patients with primary insomnia [61, 83] and in those with insomnia associated with a depressive state [84-86]. The results of comparative clinical studies evaluating the use of trazodone as a hypnotic agent for insomnia in patients with depression showed that it was at least as effective as SSRIs (fluoxetine) [37, 87] and MAOIs (brofaromine) [88] in relieving symptoms of insomnia.

Table 2

Summary of trazodone clinical trials reporting sleep endpoints in patients with or without depression ([68] Copyright 2005, Physicians Postgraduate Press. Adapted by permission)

Reference (year)	Study design	Study population (N)	Treatments, mg/day (N)	Active treatment duration	Objective sleep assessment	Subjective sleep assessment	Results of sleep endpoints
Primary insomnia
Walsh et al. [83] (1998)	Randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled	DSM-III-R-defined primary insomniacs (N = 306)	Trazodone 50 (N = 100) Zolpidem 10 (N = 102) Placebo (N = 104)	2 weeks	None	Sleep questionnaire	Week 1: both trazodone and zolpidem produced significantly shorter self-reported sleep latencies and longer self-reported sleep durations than placebo. Self-reported sleep latency was significantly shorter with zolpidem than trazodone Week 2: only zolpidem maintained significantly shorter sleep latency than placebo, and self-reported sleep duration did not vary significantly among groups
Montgomery et al. [81] (1983)	Non-randomized, non-controlled	Middle-aged self-described ‘poor sleepers’ (N = 9)	Trazodone 150 (N = 9)	3 weeks	PSG	VAS	Trazodone halved frequency of arousals interrupting sleep, reduced time spent in stage 1, increased duration of SWS (stages 3 + 4), reduced time spent in REM sleep. Trazodone did not change total sleep duration, or time required to fall asleep
Zavesicka et al. [100] (2008)	Randomized	Outpatients with primary insomnia (N = 20)	Trazodone 100 nightly with CBT (N = 10) Trazodone 100 nightly without CBT (N = 10)	8 weeks	PSG	Self-reported Insomnia Severity Index; Epworth Sleepiness Scale; HAM-A; BDI-SF	Sleep latency significantly shortened (p = 0.03), sleep efficiency increased (p = 0.004) and TST significantly prolonged (p = 0.006) with trazodone ± CBT. Combined CBT + trazodone resulted in a significant increase in SWS duration vs. CBT only (p = 0.04)
Depression with secondary assessment of sleep function
Ather et al. [52] (1985)	Randomized, double-blind, parallel-group	Elderly depressed inpatients and outpatients (N = 149)	Trazodone 100–300 (N = 51) Amitriptyline 25 (N = 50) Diazepam 5 (N = 48)	6 weeks	None	VAS (quality of sleep; daytime tiredness)	No significant difference in quality of sleep or daytime tiredness among the 3 treatment groups: trazodone, amitriptyline and diazepam
Blacker et al. [46] (1988)	Randomized, double-blind, parallel-group	Depressed outpatients (N = 227)	Trazodone 150 (N = 112) Mianserin 30–60 (N = 36) Dothiepin 75–150 (N = 35) Amitriptyline 75–100 (N = 44)	6 weeks	None	LSEQ	All 4 treatments were associated with improvements in sleep quality and ease of getting to sleep: trazodone = dothiepin > amitriptyline > mianserin
Botros et al. [47] (1989)	Randomized, double-blind, parallel-group	Depressed patients (N = 20)	Trazodone 50 (N = 10) Amitriptyline 75–200 (N = 10)	3 weeks	None	St. Mary’s Hospital Sleep Questionnaire	Sleep quality improved significantly during treatment with trazodone and amitriptyline (p < 0.001 vs. baseline), but there were no differences between the two drugs. Sleep duration increased with amitriptyline but not trazodone, although the effect did not reach statistical significance
Davey [48] (1988)	Randomized, double-blind, parallel-group	Depressed patients (N = 183)	Trazodone 50 tid (N = 87) Trazodone 150 nightly (N = 95)	6 weeks	None	LSEQ	Trazodone 150 mg qd improved ease of getting to sleep and quality of sleep during the 1st few weeks’ treatment vs. 50 mg tid, although difference did not reach significance. Improved ease of awakening and feelings after waking were greater with trazodone 50 mg tid vs. 150 mg qd. Greater reductions in middle/delayed insomnia with trazodone 150 mg qd vs. 50 mg tid
Debus et al. [49] (1988)	Randomized, double-blind, parallel-group	Depressed patients (N = 35)	Trazodone 50–400 tid (N = 17) Fluoxetine 20–60 tid (N = 18)	6 weeks	None	HAM-D	Response rates were equivalent for trazodone and fluoxetine. For fluoxetine, HAM-D scores were significantly lower at weeks 1 and 2 vs. trazodone. Trazodone improved sleep significantly more than fluoxetine
Kaynak et al. [101] (2004)	Randomized, double-blind, crossover, placebo-controlled	Depressed patients (N = 12)	Trazodone 100 (N = 6) Placebo (N = 6)	6 weeks	PSG, PSQI	HAM-D	Trazodone significantly increased total sleep time, % stage 3/4, sleep efficiency index, sleep continuity index and decreased % stage 1, number of awakenings, stage shifts vs. baseline and PSQI score
Moon and Davey [50] (1988)	Randomized, double-blind, parallel-group	Depressed outpatients (N = 39)	Trazodone nocte 150 (N = 19) Mianserin nocte 30–60 (N = 20)	6 weeks	None	LSEQ	Both trazodone and mianserin provided similar changes in sleep patterns, but improvement in feelings on and after waking occurred at a faster rate with trazodone than mianserin
Secondary insomnia (depression-associated or antidepressant-induced)
Haffmans and Vos [88] (1999)	Randomized, double-blind, crossover, placebo-controlled	Depressed patients with brofaromine-induced insomnia (N = 7)	Trazodone 50 (N = 7)	1 week	PSG	HAM-D, subjective sleep quality	Trazodone significantly improved deep sleep and sleep architecture. Subjectively, patients reported a better and deeper sleep
Mashiko et al. [102] (1999)	Dose-finding study; randomized, non-controlled	Depressed patients with sleep disorders (N = 75)	Trazodone 50, 75 or 100 (N = 75)	6 weeks	None	HAM-D; HAM-A; Self-Rating Depression Scale; Self-Rating for Sleep	Trazodone 50–100 mg/day improved sleep disorders combined with a depressive state, particularly at the 100 mg/day dosage
Mouret et al. [103] (1988)	Non-randomized, non-controlled	Depressed inpatients (N = 10)	Trazodone 400–600 (N = 10)	5 weeks	PSG	Spiegel and Norris sleep scales	Trazodone improved sleep in depressed patients: increased total duration of sleep and stage 2, decreased sleep latency and intra-sleep awakenings, and increased delta sleep and REM latency
Nierenberg et al. [84] (1994)	Randomized, double-blind, crossover, placebo-controlled	Depressed patients with fluoxetine- or bupropion-induced insomnia (N = 17)	Trazodone 50–100 (N = 17)	6.5 days (mean)	None	PSQI; YNHHDSI	Trazodone, but not placebo, improved total PSQI and YNHHDSI total sleep scores and PSQI sleep duration and YNHHDSI early morning awakening, trend toward improvement in YNHHDSI middle of the night awakenings. Subjective sleep quality and sleep latency showed trend toward improvement, but PSQI sleep efficiency and disturbances and YNHHDSI difficulty falling asleep were unaffected by trazodone. Of completers, overall sleep improvement 67 % with trazodone and 13 % with placebo
Parrino et al. [104] (1994)	Non-randomized, non-controlled, single-blind	Dysthymic patients with chronic insomnia (N = 6)	Trazodone 50–100 (N = 6)	6 weeks	PSG	VAS (subjective sleep quality)	No significant differences between trazodone and placebo for sleep initiation and maintenance. Significant overall improvement in stage 2 (p < 0.0005), SWS (p < 0.0001), total CAP time (p < 0.0001) and CAP rate (p < 0.0001) with trazodone vs. placebo
Saletu-Zyhlarz et al. [79] (2001)	Single-blind, crossover, placebo-controlled	Dysthymic patients with insomnia and healthy controls (N = 22)	Trazodone 100 (N = 11) Placebo (N = 11)	1 night	PSG	Self-Assessment of Sleep and Awakening Quality Scale	Trazodone increased SWS (stage 3/4), lengthened REM latency, decreased REM sleep and normalized PLMI vs. placebo
Saletu-Zyhlarz et al. [78] (2002)	Single-blind, crossover, placebo-controlled	Depressed patients with insomnia and healthy controls (N = 22)	Trazodone 100 (N = 11) Placebo (N = 11)	1 night	PSG	Self-Assessment of Sleep and Awakening Quality Scale	100 mg trazodone increases sleep efficiency, TST, TSP and SWS (stage 3/4), decreased wakefulness during the TSP, early morning awakening and stage 2 vs. placebo. Slight increase in duration of REM sleep, and improvement in subjective sleep quality, affectivity, numerical memory and somatic complaints
Scharf and Sachais [85] (1990)	Non-randomized, non-controlled, single-blind	Depressed patients with significant sleep disturbances (N = 6)	Trazodone 150–400 (N = 6)	5 weeks	PSG	None	Significant improvement in sleep architecture, 44 % improvement in persistent sleep latency, increased TST and stage 4 sleep. No change in % REM; but REM latency increased 28 %. Sleep efficiency improved from 80.6 % (clinically significant insomnia) to 91.9 % (normal)
van Bemmel et al. [105] (1992)	Non-randomized, non-controlled, single-blind	Depressed outpatients (N = 8)	Trazodone 300–400 (N = 8)	5 weeks	PSG	None	Trazodone did not influence sleep continuity and SWS, but significantly suppressed REM sleep and increased REM sleep latency
Sleep in healthy subjects
Ware and Pittard [106] (1990)	Double-blind, crossover, placebo-controlled	Healthy male controls (N = 6)	Trazodone 50–200 (N = 6)	4 nights	PSG	None	Trazodone significantly increased deep sleep without altering normal sleep architecture
Yamadera et al. [102] (1999)	Non-randomized, non-controlled	Healthy male controls (N = 12)	Trazodone 50–100 (N = 12)	2 nights	PSG	None	Trazodone increased SWS significantly vs. placebo

BDI-SF Beck Depression Inventory, Short Form, CAP cyclic alternating pattern, CBT cognitive behavioural therapy, HAM-A Hamilton Rating Scale of Anxiety, HAM-D Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression, LSEQ Leeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire, PLMI periodic leg movement index, PSG polysomnography, PSQI Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, qd once daily, REM rapid eye movement, SWS slow-wave sleep, tid three times daily, TSP total sleep period, TST total sleep time, VAS visual analogue scale, YNHHDSI Yale-New Haven Hospital Depressive Symptoms Inventory

Trazodone is particularly effective in the reduction of sleep disturbance in depressed patients due to its sedative effects [43]. Notably, clinical data related to the prolonged-release, once-a-day formulation show that the antidepressant efficacy of trazodone is independent of baseline insomnia severity (MADRS reduced sleep item) and independent of both the overall improvement in insomnia and the reduction in disturbed sleep as shown by the HAMD-17 sleep disturbance item. According to the authors, the anti-insomnia effect of TzCOAD was not driving the antidepressant effect, which was largely independent of the effectiveness of trazodone on the insomnia parameters [43].

Despite the increasing off-label use of trazodone for insomnia, it should be noted that there are limited clinical data in the literature supporting such widespread use, particularly in non-depressed patients. Clinical trials that explored the use of trazodone in insomnia were mostly short in duration. Reports in normal volunteers and subjects with a history of drug abuse comparing trazodone, triazolam and zolpidem seem to suggest that trazodone (dose range 100–300 mg) may have less potential for misuse among prior drug abusers [89]. Trazodone also had less performance-impairing effects, although it should be noted that these were acute studies of daytime administration [90].

Caution should be used when administering trazodone to the elderly, due to its association with potentially serious, dose-related adverse effects, including daytime sedation, orthostatic hypotension and priapism [91]. Therefore, further large, long-term controlled studies should be performed to confirm the efficacy and safety of trazodone in the treatment of insomnia without MDD.

Anxiety Disorders

Patients with depression may often suffer from additional anxiety disorders, including panic disorder and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) [92]. Pharmacological treatment of these anxiety disorders are comprised of two main drug classes, benzodiazepines and antidepressants [4, 5]. Due to its hypnotic/sedating effects, trazodone has been the subject of research over the years for the treatment of anxiety disorders.

Trazodone has been shown to be effective in patients with generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) [93], and comparable efficacy between trazodone, imipramine and diazepam was reported in a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial [94].

Although the first-line treatment option for PTSD is SSRI therapy, non-anticholinergic drugs such as trazodone may be used if SSRIs are ineffective or intolerable. In a small study of six patients with combat-related PTSD, trazodone (50–400 mg) was associated with improvements from baseline in Total Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale and self-reported Davidson Trauma Scale scores [95]. A survey of 60 patients with PTSD, trazodone therapy (50–200 mg), resulted in a decrease in nightmares and improvements in initiating and maintaining sleep [96].

Limited and conflicting data are available for the treatment of panic disorders with trazodone. In some cases, trazodone has been shown to improve symptoms associated with clinical manifestations of the disorder (i.e. GAD, phobias, depression and avoidance conduct) [97], while in others, trazodone has been reported to be ineffective and poorly tolerated [98].

Ongoing and Planned Clinical Trials of Trazodone

Currently, there is one ongoing clinical trial exploring the off-label use of trazodone IR as a hypnotic agent in patients with chronic insomnia [99]. It is an open-label, randomized study comparing 3 months of treatment with trazodone IR (50 mg) with cognitive behavioural therapy in patients with chronic insomnia [99]. The primary endpoint of this study will be the change from baseline in objective sleep duration, as measured by polysomnography and actigraphy.

A randomized, double-blind study that aims to compare the efficacy and safety of the new trazodone once a day (TzCOAD) formulation and venlafaxine extended release in patients with MDD is planned in Europe [107]. The trial is expected to enrol a total of 360 patients that will be evaluated for efficacy (HAM-D score, as primary endpoint, after 8 weeks of treatment) and safety. This study has been designed to confirm the efficacy and safety of TzCOAD in patients with MDD versus a worldwide standard reference, venlafaxine extended release. In a previous placebo-controlled trial [36], TzCOAD was shown to be as effective as monotherapy in patients with MDD; this trial should provide further evidence of its potential as monotherapy in MDD and for improvement of sleep in depressed patients.

Larger randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials are needed to establish the clinical benefit of trazodone in off-label indications, such as primary insomnia.

Conclusions

Trazodone is currently approved for the treatment of MDD in adults. Although trazodone has been on the market for over 40 years, the recent approval of a once-a-day, prolonged-release formulation may boost its clinical utilization in MDD. The multifunctional properties and mechanisms of action of the SARI trazodone enable this drug to control a range of depression-related symptoms, while avoiding adverse effects, such as insomnia, that are often seen along with SSRI treatment. Although trazodone is often used at a low dose as a sedative-hypnotic in depressed patients (as monotherapy or in combination with other antidepressants), as well as in conditions other than depression (i.e. primary insomnia), clinical evidence supporting its use in these settings is limited and further studies should be implemented.

Overall, trazodone is an effective and well tolerated SARI, with an important role in the current treatment of MDD. Trazodone is appreciated worldwide not only for its clinical effectiveness in controlling a wide range of symptoms of depression, but also for the absence of negative effects on sleep—both as monotherapy and in combination regimens. Furthermore, the new prolonged-release, once-a-day formulation may provide further optimization of its antidepressant efficacy and safety and may improve treatment compliance in MDD patients. The marketing approval process for this formulation is ongoing in several EU countries.