Literature DB >> 7622801

Mirtazapine is more effective than trazodone: a double-blind controlled study in hospitalized patients with major depression.

M van Moffaert1, J de Wilde, A Vereecken, M Dierick, J L Evrard, J Wilmotte, J Mendlewicz.   

Abstract

Two hundred hospitalized patients with DSM-III diagnosis of moderate to severe major depressive episode were randomized to receive mirtazapine or trazodone for 6 weeks in a double-blind trial. The dosages were 24-72 mg/day for mirtazapine and 150-450 mg/day for trazodone. The improvement on all depression rating scales used was generally greater for mirtazapine, with statistically significant differences over trazodone in the Hamilton Psychiatric Rating Scale for Depression total score and two subscores (the Bech melancholia factor and retardation factor), the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale total score, the General Psychiatric Impression Global Assessment Scale, the Beck score and responder rates. Mirtazapine was well tolerated, while the trazodone-treated patients experienced somnolence more frequently, particularly during the first 2 weeks of treatment. Furthermore, postural symptoms were a clinical problem in 6% of the trazodone-treated patients. In this trial, mirtazapine showed significant clinical advantages over trazodone in terms of overall efficacy and tolerability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7622801

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Clin Psychopharmacol        ISSN: 0268-1315            Impact factor:   1.659


  21 in total

Review 1.  Third-generation antidepressants: do they offer advantages over the SSRIs?

Authors:  J S Olver; G D Burrows; T R Norman
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 5.749

Review 2.  Design of clinical trials of antidepressants: should a placebo control arm be included?

Authors:  J Fritze; H J Möller
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 5.749

Review 3.  Mirtazapine versus other antidepressive agents for depression.

Authors:  Norio Watanabe; Ichiro M Omori; Atsuo Nakagawa; Andrea Cipriani; Corrado Barbui; Rachel Churchill; Toshi A Furukawa
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2011-12-07

4.  Newer antidepressants in the primary care setting.

Authors:  J Sloan Manning
Journal:  Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  2004

Review 5.  Drug treatment of depression in the 1990s. An overview of achievements and future possibilities.

Authors:  H J Möller; H P Volz
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 6.  Network Meta-Analysis and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of New Generation Antidepressants.

Authors:  Ai Leng Khoo; Hui Jun Zhou; Monica Teng; Liang Lin; Ying Jiao Zhao; Lay Beng Soh; Yee Ming Mok; Boon Peng Lim; Kok Peng Gwee
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 5.749

Review 7.  The Black Book of Psychotropic Dosing and Monitoring.

Authors:  Alan F Schatzberg; DeBattista Charles
Journal:  Psychopharmacol Bull       Date:  2018-01-15

Review 8.  Comparative efficacy and risk of harms of immediate- versus extended-release second-generation antidepressants: a systematic review with network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Barbara Nussbaumer; Laura C Morgan; Ursula Reichenpfader; Amy Greenblatt; Richard A Hansen; Megan Van Noord; Linda Lux; Bradley N Gaynes; Gerald Gartlehner
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 5.749

9.  Mirtazapine : A Review of its Pharmacology and Therapeutic Potential in the Management of Major Depression.

Authors:  R Davis; M I Wilde
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 5.749

Review 10.  Mirtazapine: a review of its use in major depression and other psychiatric disorders.

Authors:  Katherine F Croom; Caroline M Perry; Greg L Plosker
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 5.749

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.