Literature DB >> 15483016

Lower incidence of colorectal cancer and later age of disease onset in 27 families with pathogenic MSH6 germline mutations compared with families with MLH1 or MSH2 mutations: the German Hereditary Nonpolyposis Colorectal Cancer Consortium.

Jens Plaschke1, Christoph Engel, Stefan Krüger, Elke Holinski-Feder, Constanze Pagenstecher, Elisabeth Mangold, Gabriela Moeslein, Karsten Schulmann, Johannes Gebert, Magnus von Knebel Doeberitz, Josef Rüschoff, Markus Loeffler, Hans K Schackert.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of the study was the analysis of the involvement and phenotypic manifestations of MSH6 germline mutations in families suspected of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were preselected among 706 families by microsatellite instability, immunohistochemistry, and/or exclusion of MLH1 or MSH2 mutations and were subjected to MSH6 mutation analysis. Clinical and molecular data of MSH6 mutation families were compared with data from families with MLH1 and MSH2 mutations.
RESULTS: We identified 27 families with 24 different pathogenic MSH6 germline mutations, representing 3.8% of the total of the families, and 14.7% of all families with DNA mismatch repair (MMR) gene mutations (n = 183). The median age of onset of colorectal cancer in putative mutation carriers was 10 years higher for MSH6 (54 years; 95% CI, 51 to 56) compared with MLH1 and MSH2 (44 years; 95% CI, 43 to 45; log-rank test, P = .0038). Relative to other malignant tumors, colorectal cancer was less frequent in MSH6 families compared with MLH1 and MSH2 families (Fisher's exact test, P < .001). In contrast, the frequency of non-HNPCC-associated tumors was increased (Fisher's exact test, P < .001).
CONCLUSION: Later age of disease onset and lower incidence of colorectal cancer may contribute to a lower proportion of identified MSH6 mutations in families suspected of HNPCC. However, in approximately half of these families, at least one patient developed colorectal or endometrial cancer in the fourth decade of life. Therefore, a surveillance program as stringent as that for families with MLH1 or MSH2 mutations is recommended.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15483016     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2004.02.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  76 in total

1.  Identification of individuals at risk for Lynch syndrome using targeted evaluations and genetic testing: National Society of Genetic Counselors and the Collaborative Group of the Americas on Inherited Colorectal Cancer joint practice guideline.

Authors:  Scott M Weissman; Randall Burt; James Church; Steve Erdman; Heather Hampel; Spring Holter; Kory Jasperson; Matt F Kalady; Joy Larsen Haidle; Henry T Lynch; Selvi Palaniappan; Paul E Wise; Leigha Senter
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  The PREMM(1,2,6) model predicts risk of MLH1, MSH2, and MSH6 germline mutations based on cancer history.

Authors:  Fay Kastrinos; Ewout W Steyerberg; Rowena Mercado; Judith Balmaña; Spring Holter; Steven Gallinger; Kimberly D Siegmund; James M Church; Mark A Jenkins; Noralane M Lindor; Stephen N Thibodeau; Lynn Anne Burbidge; Richard J Wenstrup; Sapna Syngal
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 3.  Molecular basis for subdividing hereditary colon cancer?

Authors:  W M Grady
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 23.059

4.  Assessing the predictive accuracy of hMLH1 and hMSH2 mutation probability models.

Authors:  Kory W Jasperson; Katrina Lowstuter; Jeffrey N Weitzel
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  An individual with Muir-Torre syndrome found to have a pathogenic MSH6 gene mutation.

Authors:  Angela Arnold; Stewart Payne; Samantha Fisher; Diane Fricker; Judith Soloway; Susan M White; Marco Novelli; Kylie MacDonald; James Mackay; Richard Groves; Natalie Canham
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2007-02-24       Impact factor: 2.375

Review 6.  Prophylactic surgery in Lynch syndrome.

Authors:  V Celentano; G Luglio; G Antonelli; R Tarquini; L Bucci
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 7.  History, genetics, and strategies for cancer prevention in Lynch syndrome.

Authors:  Fay Kastrinos; Elena M Stoffel
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2013-07-23       Impact factor: 11.382

Review 8.  Endometrial cancer and Lynch syndrome: clinical and pathologic considerations.

Authors:  Larissa A Meyer; Russell R Broaddus; Karen H Lu
Journal:  Cancer Control       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.302

9.  Mismatch repair protein expression and colorectal cancer in Hispanics from Puerto Rico.

Authors:  Wilfredo E De Jesus-Monge; Carmen Gonzalez-Keelan; Ronghua Zhao; Stanley R Hamilton; Miguel Rodriguez-Bigas; Marcia Cruz-Correa
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.375

10.  Consequences of universal MSI/IHC in screening ENDOMETRIAL cancer patients for Lynch syndrome.

Authors:  Brittany A L Batte; Amanda S Bruegl; Molly S Daniels; Kari L Ring; Katherine M Dempsey; Bojana Djordjevic; Rajyalakshmi Luthra; Bryan M Fellman; Karen H Lu; Russell R Broaddus
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2014-06-14       Impact factor: 5.482

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.