Literature DB >> 24890529

Adherence to dabigatran therapy and longitudinal patient outcomes: insights from the veterans health administration.

Supriya Shore1, Evan P Carey2, Mintu P Turakhia3, Cynthia A Jackevicius4, Fran Cunningham5, Louise Pilote6, Steven M Bradley1, Thomas M Maddox1, Gary K Grunwald7, Anna E Barón8, John S Rumsfeld1, Paul D Varosy1, Preston M Schneider1, Lucas N Marzec1, P Michael Ho9.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Dabigatran is a novel oral anti-coagulant (NOAC) that reduces risk of stroke in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). It does not require routine monitoring with laboratory testing which may have an adverse impact on adherence. We aimed to describe adherence to dabigatran in the first year after initiation and assess the association between non-adherence to dabigatran and clinical outcomes in a large integrated healthcare system.
METHODS: We studied a national cohort of 5,376 patients with NVAF, initiated on dabigatran between October-2010 and September-2012 at all Veterans Affairs hospitals. Adherence to dabigatran was calculated as proportion of days covered (PDC) and association between PDC and outcomes was assessed using standard regression techniques.
RESULTS: Mean age of the study cohort was 71.3 ± 9.7 years; 98.3% were men and mean CHADS2 score was 2.4 ± 1.2 (mean CHA2DS2VASc score 3.2 ± 1.4). Median PDC was 94% (IQR 76%-100%; mean PDC 84% ± 22%) over a median follow-up of 244 days (IQR 140-351). A total of 1,494 (27.8%) patients had a PDC <80% and were classified as non-adherent. After multivariable adjustment, lower adherence was associated with increased risk for combined all-cause mortality and stroke (HR 1.13, 95% CI 1.07-1.19 per 10% decrease in PDC). Adherence to dabigatran was not associated with non-fatal bleeding or myocardial infarction.
CONCLUSIONS: In the year after initiation, adherence to dabigatran for a majority of patients is very good. However, 28% of patients in our cohort had poor adherence. Furthermore, lower adherence to dabigatran was associated with increased adverse outcomes. Concerted efforts are needed to optimize adherence to NOACs. Published by Mosby, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24890529      PMCID: PMC5381802          DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2014.03.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Heart J        ISSN: 0002-8703            Impact factor:   4.749


  26 in total

Review 1.  A primer and comparative review of major US mortality databases.

Authors:  Diane C Cowper; Joseph D Kubal; Charles Maynard; Denise M Hynes
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.797

2.  Measurement of adherence in pharmacy administrative databases: a proposal for standard definitions and preferred measures.

Authors:  Lisa M Hess; Marsha A Raebel; Douglas A Conner; Daniel C Malone
Journal:  Ann Pharmacother       Date:  2006 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.154

3.  Positive predictive value of the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction in an administrative database.

Authors:  L A Petersen; S Wright; S L Normand; J Daley
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 4.  Dabigatran etexilate in clinical practice: confronting challenges to improve safety and effectiveness.

Authors:  Michael P Gulseth; Ann K Wittkowsky; John Fanikos; Sarah A Spinler; William E Dager; Edith A Nutescu
Journal:  Pharmacotherapy       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 4.705

5.  Dabigatran versus warfarin in the treatment of acute venous thromboembolism.

Authors:  Sam Schulman; Clive Kearon; Ajay K Kakkar; Patrick Mismetti; Sebastian Schellong; Henry Eriksson; David Baanstra; Janet Schnee; Samuel Z Goldhaber
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-12-10       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Comparing the health status of VA and non-VA ambulatory patients: the veterans' health and medical outcomes studies.

Authors:  William H Rogers; Lewis E Kazis; Donald R Miller; Katherine M Skinner; Jack A Clark; Avron Spiro; R Graeme Fincke
Journal:  J Ambul Care Manage       Date:  2004 Jul-Sep

Review 7.  Medication adherence and the patient with coronary artery disease: challenges for the practitioner.

Authors:  Thomas M Maddox; P Michael Ho
Journal:  Curr Opin Cardiol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 2.161

Review 8.  Medication adherence: its importance in cardiovascular outcomes.

Authors:  P Michael Ho; Chris L Bryson; John S Rumsfeld
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2009-06-16       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Guideline-adherent antithrombotic treatment is associated with improved outcomes compared with undertreatment in high-risk patients with atrial fibrillation. The Euro Heart Survey on Atrial Fibrillation.

Authors:  Robby Nieuwlaat; S Bertil Olsson; Gregory Y H Lip; A John Camm; Günter Breithardt; Alessandro Capucci; Joan G Meeder; Martin H Prins; Samuel Lévy; Harry J G M Crijns
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 4.749

10.  Accuracy and completeness of mortality data in the Department of Veterans Affairs.

Authors:  Min-Woong Sohn; Noreen Arnold; Charles Maynard; Denise M Hynes
Journal:  Popul Health Metr       Date:  2006-04-10
View more
  70 in total

Review 1.  Factors Affecting Patients' Perception On, and Adherence To, Anticoagulant Therapy: Anticipating the Role of Direct Oral Anticoagulants.

Authors:  Ekta Y Pandya; Beata Bajorek
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 3.883

2.  Predictors of gastrointestinal bleeding among patients with atrial fibrillation after initiating dabigatran therapy.

Authors:  Julie C Lauffenburger; Denise H Rhoney; Joel F Farley; Anil K Gehi; Gang Fang
Journal:  Pharmacotherapy       Date:  2015-06-04       Impact factor: 4.705

Review 3.  Long-term prescribing of new oral anticoagulants.

Authors:  Paul Kl Chin; Matthew P Doogue
Journal:  Aust Prescr       Date:  2016-12-05

Review 4.  Dabigatran Etexilate: A Review in Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation.

Authors:  Hannah A Blair; Gillian M Keating
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 9.546

5.  Medication adherence to rivaroxaban and dabigatran in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ashley Prentice; Irene Ruiz; Erin R Weeda
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 2.300

6.  A pharmacist checklist for direct oral anticoagulant management: Raising the bar.

Authors:  Kori Leblanc; William M Semchuk; John Papastergiou; Blair Snow; Leilany Mandlsohn; Vinay Kapoor; Lisa M Guirguis; James D Douketis; William Geerts; David J Gladstone
Journal:  Can Pharm J (Ott)       Date:  2018-02-09

Review 7.  Transforming the care of atrial fibrillation with mobile health.

Authors:  Mintu P Turakhia; Daniel W Kaiser
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 8.  Reducing The Risk Of Stroke In Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation With Direct Oral Anticoagulants. Is One Of These Not Like The Others?

Authors:  Paul P Dobesh; John Fanikos
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2016-08-31

9.  Comparison of treatment persistence with different oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Tomas Forslund; Björn Wettermark; Paul Hjemdahl
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2015-11-27       Impact factor: 2.953

10.  Oral therapy adherence and satisfaction in patients with multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Marine Solano; Etienne Daguindau; Cyril Faure; Pierre Loriod; Coline Pain; Anne-Cécile Maes; Pauline Marguet; Marie Kroemer; Anne Rumpler; Jean Fontan; Eric Deconinck; Samuel Limat; Anne-Laure Clairet
Journal:  Ann Hematol       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 3.673

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.