| Literature DB >> 23185268 |
Daniel Fonceka1, Hodo-Abalo Tossim, Ronan Rivallan, Hélène Vignes, Elodie Lacut, Fabien de Bellis, Issa Faye, Ousmane Ndoye, Soraya C M Leal-Bertioli, José F M Valls, David J Bertioli, Jean-Christophe Glaszmann, Brigitte Courtois, Jean-François Rami.
Abstract
Chromosome segment substitution lines (CSSLs) are powerful QTL mapping populations that have been used to elucidate the molecular basis of interesting traits of wild species. Cultivated peanut is an allotetraploid with limited genetic diversity. Capturing the genetic diversity from peanut wild relatives is an important objective in many peanut breeding programs. In this study, we used a marker-assisted backcrossing strategy to produce a population of 122 CSSLs from the cross between the wild synthetic allotetraploid (A. ipaënsis×A. duranensis)(4x) and the cultivated Fleur11 variety. The 122 CSSLs offered a broad coverage of the peanut genome, with target wild chromosome segments averaging 39.2 cM in length. As a demonstration of the utility of these lines, four traits were evaluated in a subset of 80 CSSLs. A total of 28 lines showed significant differences from Fleur11. The line×trait significant associations were assigned to 42 QTLs: 14 for plant growth habit, 15 for height of the main stem, 12 for plant spread and one for flower color. Among the 42 QTLs, 37 were assigned to genomic regions and three QTL positions were considered putative. One important finding arising from this QTL analysis is that peanut growth habit is a complex trait that is governed by several QTLs with different effects. The CSSL population developed in this study has proved efficient for deciphering the molecular basis of trait variations and will be useful to the peanut scientific community for future QTL mapping studies.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2012 PMID: 23185268 PMCID: PMC3501512 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0048642
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Selected morphological characteristics of the parents.
| Species | Accession | Genome | Ploidy level | Cycle | Growth Habit | Plant Height (cm) | Length of the secondary axis (cm) |
|
| KG30076 | B | 2n | Annual | Prostrate | 45 | 50 |
|
| V14167 | A | 2n | Annual | Prostrate | 20–30 | 140 |
|
| Fleur11 | AB | 4n | Annual | Erect | 16–22 | 20–25 |
Figure 1Breeding scheme for the development of the CSSL population.
Figure 3Graphical genotypes of the 122 CSSLs.
The 21 linkage groups of the map are named from a01 to a10 (A-genome) and from b01 to b11 (B-genome) and are represented vertically. The marker names are shown on each linkage group. The 122 CSSL are depicted horizontally. The black areas represent the wild target chromosome segments, while the white areas represent the Fleur11 genetic background, and the grey areas represent the wild supernumerary chromosome segments.
Comparison between the observed and expected numbers of heterozygous loci in the population. χ2: Chi-square goodness of fit test at 1 ddl.
| All lines | Selected lines | |||||
| Generation | Observed | Expected | χ2 | Observed | Expected | χ2 |
| BC1F1 | 6630 | 6496 | 5.5** | 1631 | 1625 | 0.04 |
| BC2F1 | 5283 | 5052 | 14.08*** | 1438 | 1649.5 | 36.15*** |
| BC3F1 | 10701 | 10056.62 | 47.18*** | 1353 | 1508.87 | 18.40*** |
| BC4F1 | 5149 | 4131.12 | 267.51*** | 884 | 899.75 | 0.58 |
Figure 2Evolution of donor and recurrent genome representation during the development of the CSSL population.
Genotypic features of the progeny of each generation.
| Generation | Number of genotyped lines | Number of selected lines | % homozygous Fleur 11 in selected lines | % heterozygous in selected lines | % homozygous AiAd | Mean size of introgressed segments (cM) | Min size of introgressed segments (cM) | Max size of introgressed segments (cM) | Mean number of introgressed segments per line |
| BC1F1 | 88 | 22 | 48.68 | 50.99 | 0 | 40.36 | 2.33 | 99.65 | 17.07 |
| BC2F1 | 192 | 58 | 77.16 | 21.59 | 0 | 35.63 | 2.35 | 73.92 | 11 |
| BC3F1 | 565 | 80 | 87.31 | 10.1 | 1.23 | 39.23 | 11.3 | 115.6 | 6.43 |
| BC4F1 | 807 | 100 | 93.66 | 6.13 | 0.24 | 39.15 | 6.5 | 115.6 | 4.06 |
| BC4F2 | 1180 | 140 | 96.17 | 2.4 | 1.4 | 39.5 | 5.7 | 115.6 | 2.12 |
| BC4F3 | 1078 | 122 | 97.28 | 0.14 | 2.24 | 39.24 | 5.7 | 115.6 | 1.5 |
Variation and descriptive statistics of the traits measured in the CSSL population and the recurrent parent.
| Fleur11 | 80 CSSLs | |||||||||||
| Trait | Nb Plots | Nb plants | Mean | Min | Max | CV(%) | Nb Plots/IL | Nb plants | Mean | Min | Max | CV(%) |
| GH | 60 | 458 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | - | 6 | 4169 | 0.11 | 0.00 | 0.87 | - |
| PS | 60 | 458 | 43.16 | 34.17 | 54.40 | 11.63 | 6 | 4169 | 47.52 | 31.00 | 80.40 | 18.07 |
| PH | 60 | 458 | 15.23 | 8.60 | 21.15 | 18.39 | 6 | 4169 | 14.83 | 7.20 | 24.07 | 20.90 |
Significant line×trait associations observed in the CSSL population.
| CSSL Name | Plant nb | Chromosome | GH (%) | PH (%) | PS (%) | YF |
| 12CS_023 | 55 | A01 | 41.8*** | ns | 23.5*** | 0 |
| 12CS_016 | 52 | A01 | 36.9*** | −25.7*** | 18.2** | 0 |
| 12CS_052 | 56 | A02 | ns | 17.7* | ns | 0 |
| 12CS_004 | 50 | A03 | 20.4*** | ns | 26.9*** | 0 |
| 12CS_042 | 48 | A03 | 17.5** | −17.7* | ns | 0 |
| 12CS_022 | 54 | A05 | 76.5*** | −28*** | 64.5*** | 0 |
| 12CS_012 | 51 | A05 | 47.6*** | −32.6*** | 31.9*** | 0 |
| 12CS_009 | 52 | A05 | 49.9*** | −20.9*** | 41.9*** | 1 |
| 12CS_116 | 54 | A05 | 39.4*** | ns | 39.1*** | 1 |
| 12CS_008 | 57 | A06 | 22.7*** | ns | 17.2** | 0 |
| 12CS_091 | 46 | A07 | 16.4** | −25*** | ns | 0 |
| 12CS_039 | 52 | A08 | ns | 22.1*** | ns | 0 |
| 12CS_084 | 48 | A08 | 22.7*** | ns | 18.6** | 0 |
| 12CS_104 | 60 | A10 | 60.1*** | ns | 53.4*** | 0 |
| 12CS_119 | 53 | B02 | ns | 19.3** | ns | 0 |
| 12CS_021 | 46 | B02 | ns | 19.6** | ns | 0 |
| 12CS_001 | 53 | B03 | ns | 21.3*** | ns | 0 |
| 12CS_024 | 50 | B04 | 36.7*** | ns | 42.3*** | 0 |
| 12CS_011 | 55 | B05 | 45.8*** | −20.7*** | 34.8*** | 0 |
| 12CS_007 | 56 | B05 | 35.2*** | ns | 25.9*** | 0 |
| 12CS_076 | 56 | B06 | 29.7*** | ns | 17.3** | 0 |
| 12CS_047 | 57 | B06 | 55.9*** | −35.6*** | 32.6*** | 0 |
| 12CS_050 | 54 | B06 | 48.4*** | −20.4** | 40.3*** | 0 |
| 12CS_069 | 57 | B06 | ns | 31.4*** | 21.7*** | 0 |
| 12CS_079 | 53 | B09 | ns | −18.5** | ns | 0 |
| 12CS_033 | 58 | B10 | 60.5*** | −16.1* | 70.7*** | 0 |
| 12CS_014 | 53 | B10 | ns | 18.2** | 17.3** | 0 |
| 12CS_010 | 54 | B11 | 29.0*** | ns | 33.3*** | 0 |
The values for GH (growth habit), PH (plant height) and PS (plant spread) represent the differences between the CSSL line and Fleur11, relative to the value of Fleur11. For the categorical trait YF (flower color), the value 1 corresponds to the yellow flower phenotype. Plant nb: number of plants measured. Chromosome: chromosome carrying the target segment.
Figure 4Graphical genotypes of the 80 CSSLs, highlighting significant lines×traits significant association and QTL positions.
Graphical genotypes are represented in the same way as in Figure 3. Lines showing significant differences from Fleur11 are highlighted in orange. Relative line effects for each trait are depicted as circles on the right of the graphic. The size of each circle is proportional to its relative effect. Horizontal bars at the bottom of the graphic indicate deduced QTL positions. The colors of the circles and bars represent the direction of the effect. Red = increasing effect, green = decreasing effect.