| Literature DB >> 23185233 |
Daniela Palgunow1, Maja Klapper, Frank Döring.
Abstract
Dietary restriction (DR) extends lifespan in man species and modulates evolutionary conserved signalling and metabolic pathways. Most of these studies were done in adult animals. Here we investigated fat phenotypes of C. elegans larvae and adults which were exposed to DR during development. This approach was named "developmental-DR" (dDR). Moderate as well as stringent dDR increased the triglyceride to protein ratio in L4 larvae and adult worms. This alteration was accompanied by a marked expansion of intestinal and hypodermal lipid droplets. In comparison to ad libitum condition, the relative proportion of fat stored in large lipid droplets (>50 µm(3)) was increased by a factor of about 5 to 6 in larvae exposed to dDR. Microarray-based expression profiling identified several dDR-regulated genes of lipolysis and lipogenesis which may contribute to the observed fat phenotypes. In conclusion, dDR increases the triglyceride to protein ratio, enlarges lipid droplets and alters the expression of genes functioning in lipid metabolism in C. elegans. These changes might be an effective adaptation to conserve fat stores in animals subjected to limiting food supply during development.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 23185233 PMCID: PMC3502458 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0046198
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Scheme of the established solid medium based dietary restriction method to apply dietary restriction during development (dDR) in C. elegans.
Escherichia coli (E. coli) OP50, serving as food source for C. elegans, was cultivated at 37°C until an optical density (OD600) = 1.5 was reached (OD600 = 1.0≈1.0×109 cfu/ml). Different ODs (6.0, 3.0, 1.5, 1.0, 0.7, 0.3) were adjusted in M9 buffer. Standard Nematode Growth Medium (NGM) was used for ad libitum (AL) condition. For dietary restriction (dDR), bactopeptone was omitted from NGM agar plates to prevent bacterial growth. A defined amount (250 µl) of different OP50 suspensions was seeded on dDR plates, resulting in a gradient of colony forming units (cfu) per plate. For AL plates, an OP50 suspension of OD1.5 was used. Nematodes were synchronized by hypochlorite treatment, and 500 eggs per agar plate were sorted via cytometry-based COPAS Biosort system. Animals were cultivated at 20°C and harvested at second larval stage (L2, 24 h after hatching), fourth larval stage (L4, 48 h) or after reaching adulthood (adult, 72–78 h). At L4 stage, nematodes were transferred once to fresh agar plates.
Figure 2Influence of dDR on body proportion.
Wild-type nematodes were cultivated under AL or specified dDR condition and analyzed at first day of adulthood. (A) Representative bright-field microscopy photographs of nematodes (n>50 per condition) in dependence on OP50 density. The anterior part is on the right. Magnification 50×; scale bar, 200 µm. (B–D). Data for body width (µm), length (µm) and volume (nl) of single worms (n>50 per condition) derived from bright-field microscopy images. The body volume was calculated using a worm adapted cylinder volume formula which includes area and perimeter of single animals. Comparative calculations between AL and dDR treated animals are provided in . (E, F) Time of flight (TOF, AU) and extinction (AU) values (n>500 per condition) were collected by COPAS Biosort system. Bars represent a mean ± SEM from two to three independent experiments (***p<0.001). AU = arbitrary unit.
Figure 3Influence of dDR on triglyceride (TAG) and protein content.
(A) TAG content per worm (ng), (B) protein content per worm (ng/w) and (C) TAG/protein ratio of AL and dDR (dDR1.5, dDR0.7) fed wild-type worms were compared. Animals were grown until L4 larval stage or first day of adulthood. Results are represented as mean ± SEM of three independent experiments (*p<0.05, **p<0.005, ***p<0.001).
Figure 4Fat staining of dDR adult C. elegans.
(A–C) BODIPY 493/503 (fixative staining) fluorescence microscopy and corresponding bright-field microscopy images of AL (A), dDR1.5 (B) and dDR0.7 (C) fed wild-type worms at first day of adulthood. (D–F) Oil red O staining of AL (D), dDR1.5 (E) and dDR0.7 (F) treated adult wild-type worms. Magnification of all photographs 200×; scale bar, 50 µm. The anterior part is on the right. Arrow heads indicate lipid droplets (LD) in the intestine (red) or in the hypodermis (white).
Figure 5Imaging of lipid droplets in dDR L2 larvae by scanning-laser confocal microscopy.
Wild-type animals were cultivated on AL (A), dDR 1.5 (B) and dDR 0.7 (C) agar plates until reaching the L2 stage and harvested for fixative BODIPY 493/503 staining. Images derived from scanning-laser confocal (SLC) microscopy are shown as maximum projection of 20–30 images from a z-stack at 0.5 µm interval. The anterior part is on the left. (D–F) Magnification of LDs in pharynx region. Arrow heads indicate enlarged hypodermal LDs. Magnification 630×.
Figure 6Imaging of lipid droplets in dDR L4 larvae by scanning-laser confocal microscopy.
Wild-type animals grown on AL (A), dDR1.5 (B) and dDR0.7 (C) plates were harvested at L4 stage and used for fixative BODIPY 493/503 staining. Images derived from CLS microscopy and are shown as maximum projection of ∼40 images from a z-stack at 0.5 µm interval. The anterior part is on the left, the posterior on the right. (D–F) Detailed view of the pharynx region. Arrow heads indicate enlarged hypodermal LDs. Magnification 630×.
Figure 7Imaging of lipid droplets in dDR adult worms by scanning-laser confocal microscopy.
Fixative BODIPY 493/503 staining of adult wild-type worms cultivated under AL (A), dDR1.5 (B) and dDR0.7 (C) condition. CLS microscopy images of pharynx (on the right), central and tail region (on the left) are shown as maximum projection of 70–110 images from a z-stack at 0.5 µm interval. (D–F) Detailed view of tail region. Arrow heads indicate hypodermal LDs. Magnification 630×.
Figure 8Size classification of BODIPY 493/503-stained lipid droplets in pharynx and tail region of dDR larvae and adult C. elegans.
The volumes of all BODIPY 493/503-positive droplets (fixative staining) in pharynx and tail region of AL and dDR (dDR1.5, dDR0.7) treated wild-type animals were obtained from single z-stacks of CLS microscopy images. The relative number of lipid droplets (%) that are 0–10 µm3, 10–25 µm3, 25–50 µm3 and >50 µm3 in volume was calculated for L2 larvae (A), L4 larvae (B) and adult worms (C). Data derive from eight to ten animals per feeding condition and developmental stage, respectively. Results are shown as mean ± SEM from three independent experiments. (*p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001).
Figure 9Mean lipid droplet volume and volume-% of large-sized lipid droplets of dDR larvae and adult C. elegans.
Mean LD volume (µm3) (A–C) and percentage volume of large-sized LDs (>50 µm3) on the total volume of all detected droplets (%) (D–F) within pharynx and tail region was quantified in L2 and L4 larvae and adult wild-type worms. Animals were fed on AL or two different dDR conditions (dDR1.5, dDR0.7). LDs were visualized by fixative BODIPY 493/503 staining. LD volumes were calculated from z-stacks of CLS microscopy images. Eight to ten animals were analyzed per condition and experiment. Results are shown as mean ± SEM from three independent experiments (*p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001).
Summary of dDR response genes in C. elegans.
| Fold change of regulation | |||||
| L4 | adult | ||||
| Gene | Description | DR1.5 | DR0.7 | DR1.5 | DR0.7 |
|
| |||||
|
| Δ-9 fatty acid desaturase | 3.7 | 3.6 | 2.3 | 2.5 |
| Y48A6B.9 | putative mitochondrial trans-2-enol-CoA reductase (FA elongation) | 2.7 | 3.9 | 2.7 | 2.7 |
| Y53G8B.2 | diacylglycerol acyltransferase (DGAT) | 3.5 | 5.1 | 2.6 | 2.6 |
|
| Fatty acid acyl-CoA synthetase | 2.4 | 3.2 | 8.3 | 12.0 |
|
| Fatty acid acyl-CoA synthetase | −4.5 | −2.3 | −5.3 | −7.6 |
| T20B3.1 | Carnitine acyltransferase | 2.4 | 3.7 | 10.1 | 9.2 |
| K09H11.1.1 | Acyl-CoA dehydrogenase, mitochondrial | 2.2 | 2.6 | 2.0 | 2.2 |
| F58F9.7.1 | Acyl-CoA oxidase, peroxisomal | 2.1 | 2.7 | 2.4 | 2.3 |
| F58F9.7.3 | Acyl-CoA oxidase, peroxisomal | 2.0 | 2.7 | 2.6 | 2.4 |
|
| Triacylglycerol lipase (class 2) | 11.1 | 12.8 | 2.7 | 4.0 |
| C40H1.8.1 | Predicted lipase (class3) | −3.7 | −4.2 | −4.0 | −3.0 |
|
| Triacylglycerol lipase | −4.3 | −5.6 | −3.1 | −4.3 |
|
| Triacylglycerol lipase (class2) | −2.2 | −2.3 | −3.3 | −3.9 |
|
| Triglyceride lipase- cholesterol esterase | −3.7 | −4.2 | −2.4 | −2.2 |
|
| |||||
|
| Fatty Acid/retinol binding protein | 10.7 | 13.4 | 3.7 | 3.1 |
| F22E5.1 | Lipid storage | −2.1 | −4.3 | −20.7 | −17.9 |
|
| Sweet sugar transporter family member; lipid storage | 2.1 | 2.3 | 4.0 | 4.0 |
|
| Lipoprotein, lipid transporter activity | −2.5 | −6.2 | −15.9 | −49.5 |
|
| |||||
|
| UDP-glucuronosyl and UDP-glucosyl transferase | −6.6 | −9.5 | −29.1 | −30.5 |
|
| UDP-glucuronosyl and UDP-glucosyl transferase | 42.7 | 31.5 | 6.3 | 6.8 |
|
| UDP-glucuronosyl and UDP-glucosyl transferase | −2.6 | −2.6 | −7.2 | −5.8 |
|
| UDP-glucuronosyl and UDP-glucosyl transferase | −3.0 | −4.0 | −3.0 | −3.7 |
|
| UDP-glucuronosyl and UDP-glucosyl transferase | 12.2 | 13.9 | 34.0 | 41.7 |
| Y4C6B.6 | Beta-glucocerebrosidase; lysosome organization, carbohydrate and sphingolipid metabolic process | 6.2 | 7.0 | 31.8 | 34.1 |
|
| Dehydrogenase, short chain | 2.2 | 3.5 | 3.8 | 3.7 |
|
| Short-chain dehydrogenase/reductase | 2.2 | 3.2 | 2.3 | 2.6 |
|
| Short-chain dehydrogenase/reductase | 2.3 | 3.2 | 2.2 | 2.5 |
|
| Putative cystathionine gamma-lyase, amino acid metabolic process | 3.3 | 2.6 | 2.1 | 2.1 |
|
| Putative cystathionine gamma-lyase, amino acid metabolic process | 3.3 | 2.6 | 2.1 | 2.2 |
|
| Asparagine synthase (glutamine-hydrolyzing) | 2.2 | 3.6 | 7.8 | 7.6 |
| C01B10.7 | Transferase activity | −2.3 | −4.5 | −5.3 | −7.6 |
| C42D4.2 | Carboxylesterase and related proteins | −2.0 | −4.1 | −8.2 | −10.9 |
| F10C2.3 | catalytic activity | 2.6 | 2.9 | 3.0 | 2.5 |
| F54F3.4 | Reductase with broad range of substrate specificities | 2.9 | 4.1 | 5.0 | 5.7 |
|
| |||||
|
| DAF-16/FOFO controlled, germline Tumor affecting | 8.1 | 26.4 | 8.3 | 9.8 |
|
| Downstream of DAF-16 (regulated by DAF-16) family member | −2.4 | −2.9 | −2.2 | −2.6 |
|
| Small heat-shock protein, response to heat | 4.9 | 6.3 | 3.0 | 3.0 |
|
| Metallothionein, functions in metall detoxification and homeostasis and stress adaptation; plays a role in regulating growth and fertility, determination of adult lifespan | 3.2 | 3.9 | 2.8 | 3.1 |
| T16G1.7 | Orthologous to human gene ALIAS DLC1 CANDIDATE TUMOR SUPPRESSOR GENE (DLEC1) | 8.4 | 10.5 | 10.2 | 13.6 |
|
| |||||
|
| DJ-1 (mammalian transcriptional regulator) related | 3.2 | 4.7 | 2.2 | 3.0 |
|
| Nuclear hormone receptor | 2.8 | 2.7 | −16.5 | −18.4 |
|
| Nuclear hormone receptor | 2.3 | 2.8 | 4.1 | 4.8 |
|
| Nuclear hormone receptor | 2.3 | 2.8 | 4.1 | 4.8 |
|
| Nuclear hormone receptor | 2.4 | 2.6 | −10.2 | −9.4 |
|
| O-Acyltransferase homolog | −2.1 | −2.5 | −2.6 | −4.8 |
|
| |||||
|
| C-type lectin | −2.7 | −3.8 | −6.5 | −4.9 |
|
| C-type lectin | 6.8 | 5.4 | 2.3 | 4.1 |
|
| C-type lectin | −2.2 | −2.7 | −3.6 | −4.5 |
|
| C-type lectin | −2.5 | −2.5 | −3.0 | −3.6 |
|
| C-type lectin | −3.6 | −4.0 | −2.9 | −3.5 |
|
| C-type lectin | 2.2 | 2.6 | −2.2 | −2.4 |
|
| C-type lectin | −2.7 | −3.1 | −3.3 | −2.8 |
| F35E12.5 | CUB-like domain bearing protein | −3.0 | −3.8 | −24.7 | −30.3 |
| F55G11.4 | CUB-like domain bearing protein | −3.7 | −3.9 | −11.5 | −11.8 |
| F55G11.7.2 | CUB-like domain bearing protein | −2.0 | −2.2 | −5.8 | −6.7 |
|
| Lysozyme activity | −2.4 | −2.3 | −18.6 | −25.8 |
|
| Saposin-like family member; Saposin B | −2.0 | −3.3 | −7.2 | −14.6 |
|
| |||||
|
| Cytochrome P450 CYP2 subfamily member | 9.2 | 16.4 | 3.8 | 4.0 |
|
| Cytochrome P450 CYP2 subfamily member | −2.9 | −3.5 | −16.6 | −20.5 |
|
| Cytochrome P450 CYP2 subfamily member | −5.5 | −8.1 | −15.7 | −33.0 |
|
| Cytochrome P450 CYP2 subfamily member, lipid storage | −4.3 | −6.5 | −22.0 | −27.7 |
|
| Cytochrome P450 CYP2 subfamily member, lipid storage | −2.8 | −3.3 | −12.5 | −13.0 |
|
| Defense-related protein containing SCP domain | −3.7 | −2.9 | −53.2 | −46.7 |
|
| |||||
|
| Ammonia permease | −2.1 | −2.8 | −7.6 | −7.3 |
| C18D1.2 | Permease of the major facilitator superfamily | 4.5 | 6.4 | 3.9 | 5.5 |
| F56A4.10 | Permease of the major facilitator superfamily | −2.3 | −2.4 | −6.2 | −8.7 |
| Y19D10A.8 | Transmembrane transport, predicted | −2.1 | −2.2 | −3.1 | −9.5 |
|
| |||||
| C15C8.3 | Aspartyl protease | −2.1 | −3.7 | −24.3 | −14.8 |
|
| Hormone activity | 2.5 | 2.5 | −3.4 | −4.3 |
|
| Plasma membrane glycoprotein CD36 and related membrane receptors; cell adhesion | −2.1 | −2.6 | −6.2 | −6.2 |
|
| Seven TM Receptor; 7-transmembrane olfactory family member | 2.5 | 3.1 | 2.3 | 2.9 |
|
| Sonic hedgehog and related proteins; cell-cell signaling | 2.3 | 2.7 | 6.4 | 8.0 |
The table shows the predicted molecular functions and fold changes in gene expression of DR response genes that were commonly regulated under moderate and stringent DR (DR1.5 and DR0.7) in L4 and adult wild-type worms. Genes with unknown function are excluded in this table. Criteria for inclusion in this data set were a fold-change >2.0 and significance threshold of p-value<0.05.
Description of genes is based on the gene ontology (GO) annotation for C. elegans (WormBase, www.wormbase.org., release WS 198) unless otherwise noted.
Fold changes are understood between the DR and AL group. A positive number indicates a higher gene expression in DR animals. In case of down-regulated genes, the fold-change was calculated as 1/ratio and a minus was added to the quotient. A negative number consequently indicates a lower gene expression in DR animals.
Description is based on Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG, www.genome.jp/kegg/, release 61.0).
Figure 10Illustration of shared genes regulated under stringent and moderate dDR in wild-type L4 larvae and adults.
(A) Comparison of significantly up- and down-regulated genes in L4 larvae (set I) and adult worms (set II) grown under dDR1.5 and dDR0.7 relative to AL treated control group. Numbers of regulated genes within each subset are listed. Intersections represent shared regulated genes. Selected criteria for inclusion in the gene subsets were a fold change in expression to exceed 2-fold and a confidence level of 95% (p<0.05, t-test). (B) Combination of the 2 sets revealed shared regulated genes (‘dDR response genes’) used for subsequent analysis. (C) The pie chat represents the functional categories of shared dDR response genes based on their related molecular function using gene ontology (GO) annotation for C. elegans (WormBase, release WS 198). Genes with unknown function are excluded in this analysis.