Literature DB >> 23185103

Polysemy in Sentence Comprehension: Effects of Meaning Dominance.

Stephani Foraker1, Gregory L Murphy.   

Abstract

Words like church are polysemous, having two related senses (a building and an organization). Three experiments investigated how polysemous senses are represented and processed during sentence comprehension. On one view, readers retrieve an underspecified, core meaning, which is later specified more fully with contextual information. On another view, readers retrieve one or more specific senses. In a reading task, context that was neutral or biased towards a particular sense preceded a polysemous word. Disambiguating material consistent with only one sense followed, in a second sentence (Experiment 1) or the same sentence (Experiments 2 & 3). Reading the disambiguating material was faster when it was consistent with that context, and dominant senses were committed to more strongly than subordinate senses. Critically, following neutral context, the continuation was read more quickly when it selected the dominant sense, and the degree of sense dominance partially explained the reading time advantage. Similarity of the senses also affected reading times. Across experiments, we found that sense selection may not be completed immediately following a polysemous word but is completed at a sentence boundary. Overall, the results suggest that readers select an individual sense when reading a polysemous word, rather than a core meaning.

Entities:  

Year:  2012        PMID: 23185103      PMCID: PMC3505093          DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2012.07.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mem Lang        ISSN: 0749-596X            Impact factor:   3.059


  7 in total

1.  Processing ambiguous verbs: evidence from eye movements.

Authors:  M J Pickering; S Frisson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  The processing of metonymy: evidence from eye movements.

Authors:  S Frisson; M J Pickering
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  The representation of polysemy: MEG evidence.

Authors:  Liina Pylkkänen; Rodolfo Llinás; Gregory L Murphy
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Making sense of word senses: the comprehension of polysemy depends on sense overlap.

Authors:  Ekaterini Klepousniotou; Debra Titone; Carolina Romero
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 5.  Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research.

Authors:  K Rayner
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 17.737

6.  Lexical complexity and fixation times in reading: effects of word frequency, verb complexity, and lexical ambiguity.

Authors:  K Rayner; S A Duffy
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1986-05

7.  Using puns to study contextual influences on lexical ambiguity resolution: evidence from eye movements.

Authors:  Heather Sheridan; Eyal M Reingold; Meredyth Daneman
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-10
  7 in total
  7 in total

1.  Offline dominance and zeugmatic similarity normings of variably ambiguous words assessed against a neural language model (BERT).

Authors:  Katherine A DeLong; Sean Trott; Marta Kutas
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2022-06-10

Review 2.  How meaning similarity influences ambiguous word processing: the current state of the literature.

Authors:  Chelsea M Eddington; Natasha Tokowicz
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-02

Review 3.  Figurative language processing in atypical populations: the ASD perspective.

Authors:  Mila Vulchanova; David Saldaña; Sobh Chahboun; Valentin Vulchanov
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 3.169

4.  Processing and Representation of Ambiguous Words in Chinese Reading: Evidence from Eye Movements.

Authors:  Wei Shen; Xingshan Li
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-11-03

5.  The Mental Representation of Polysemy across Word Classes.

Authors:  Anastasiya Lopukhina; Anna Laurinavichyute; Konstantin Lopukhin; Olga Dragoy
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-02-21

6.  One page of text: Eye movements during regular and thorough reading, skimming, and spell checking.

Authors:  Alexander Strukelj; Diederick C Niehorster
Journal:  J Eye Mov Res       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 0.957

7.  Persistence Conditions of Institutional Entities: Investigating Copredication Through a Forced-Choice Experiment.

Authors:  Elliot Murphy
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-11-30
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.