Literature DB >> 11294449

Processing ambiguous verbs: evidence from eye movements.

M J Pickering1, S Frisson.   

Abstract

In 2 eye-tracking experiments, participants read verbs that had 2 (unrelated) meanings or 2 (related) senses in contexts that disambiguated before or after the verb, to the dominant or subordinate interpretation. A 3rd experiment used unambiguous verbs. The results indicated that the language processor used information about context in the early stages of resolving meaning ambiguities but only during integration for sense ambiguities. Effects of preference were delayed for both types of verbs. The results contrast with findings concerning the processing of nouns (e.g., K. Rayner & S. A. Duffy, 1986). For meaning ambiguities, the authors argue that delays in resolution allow both meanings to reach a high level of activation, thus reducing effects of frequency. For sense ambiguities, the authors argue that the processor does not access multiple senses but activates one underspecified meaning and uses context to home in on the appropriate sense.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11294449     DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.27.2.556

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  9 in total

1.  Sex Differences in Facial Scanning: Similarities and Dissimilarities Between Infants and Adults.

Authors:  Jennifer L Rennels; Andrew J Cummings
Journal:  Int J Behav Dev       Date:  2013-03

2.  The time course of verb processing in Dutch sentences.

Authors:  Dieuwke de Goede; Lewis P Shapiro; Femke Wester; David A Swinney; Roelien Bastiaanse
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2009-05-19

3.  Polysemy in Sentence Comprehension: Effects of Meaning Dominance.

Authors:  Stephani Foraker; Gregory L Murphy
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2012-09-04       Impact factor: 3.059

4.  Processing coordinate structures in Chinese: evidence from eye movements.

Authors:  Chen Qingrong; Huang Yan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-25       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Incremental Language Comprehension Difficulty Predicts Activity in the Language Network but Not the Multiple Demand Network.

Authors:  Leila Wehbe; Idan Asher Blank; Cory Shain; Richard Futrell; Roger Levy; Titus von der Malsburg; Nathaniel Smith; Edward Gibson; Evelina Fedorenko
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2021-07-29       Impact factor: 4.861

Review 6.  Figurative language processing in atypical populations: the ASD perspective.

Authors:  Mila Vulchanova; David Saldaña; Sobh Chahboun; Valentin Vulchanov
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Individual differences in executive control relate to metaphor processing: an eye movement study of sentence reading.

Authors:  Georgie Columbus; Naveed A Sheikh; Marilena Côté-Lecaldare; Katja Häuser; Shari R Baum; Debra Titone
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-01-13       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  The Mental Representation of Polysemy across Word Classes.

Authors:  Anastasiya Lopukhina; Anna Laurinavichyute; Konstantin Lopukhin; Olga Dragoy
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-02-21

9.  The critical role of interference control in metaphor comprehension evidenced by the drift-diffusion model.

Authors:  Hee-Dong Yoon; Minho Shin; Hyeon-Ae Jeon
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-09-29       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.