Literature DB >> 23184064

Comparative evaluation of 2.0-mm locking plate system vs. 2.0-mm nonlocking plate system for mandibular fractures--a retrospective study.

Ish Kumar1, Virender Singh, Anusha Singh, Varun Arora, Ajay Bajaj.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this retrospective study is to evaluate the efficacy of the 2.0-mm locking miniplate/screw system in comparison to the 2.0-mm nonlocking miniplate/screw system in mirror image mandibular fractures. MATERIAL AND
METHOD: A retrospective clinical trial was reviewed in the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Government Dental College, Pt. B.D. Sharma University of Health Sciences Rohtak for a period of 30 months (June 2007 to December 2009). A total of 30 patient pairs with isolated identical mandibular fracture (single or multiple) having 88 fractures were analyzed.
RESULTS: A total of 11 complications that occurred represented 12.5% of the total. Six complications occurred at angle, three in the body and two at parasymphysis. Four complications occurred in the locking group and seven in the nonlocking group, with complication rates accounting for 9% and 16%, respectively. When comparing the overall complication rates according to plates used, the chi-square test showed no statistically significant difference between the locking and nonlocking plates (p > 0.05). DISCUSSION: Mandible fractures treated with the 2.0-mm locking plates and the 2.0-mm nonlocking plates present similar short-term complication rates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23184064     DOI: 10.1007/s10006-012-0377-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 1865-1550


  14 in total

1.  Does plate adaptation affect stability? A biomechanical comparison of locking and nonlocking plates.

Authors:  Richard H Haug; Chad C Street; Michele Goltz
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 1.895

2.  Bridging of mandibular defects with two different reconstruction systems: an experimental study.

Authors:  A L Söderholm; C Lindqvist; K Skutnabb; B Rahn
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 1.895

3.  Transoral 2.0-mm locking miniplate fixation of mandibular fractures plus 1 week of maxillomandibular fixation: a prospective study.

Authors:  Ayman Chritah; Stewart K Lazow; Julius R Berger
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 1.895

4.  Fixation of mandibular fractures with 2.0-mm miniplates: review of 191 cases.

Authors:  Marisa Aparecida Cabrini Gabrielli; Mário Francisco Real Gabrielli; Elcio Marcantonio; Eduardo Hochuli-Vieira
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 1.895

5.  Infections associated with locking reconstruction plates: a retrospective review.

Authors:  David Kirkpatrick; Rahul Gandhi; Joseph E Van Sickels
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 1.895

6.  Titanium-coated hollow screw and reconstruction plate system for bridging of lower jaw defects: biomechanical aspects.

Authors:  F Sutter; J Raveh
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 2.789

7.  Transoral 2.0-mm miniplate fixation of mandibular fractures plus 2 weeks' maxillomandibular fixation: a prospective study.

Authors:  Reza Bolourian; Stewart Lazow; Julius Berger
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 1.895

8.  A prospective randomized clinical trial comparing 2.0-mm locking plates to 2.0-mm standard plates in treatment of mandible fractures.

Authors:  Chad P Collins; Galia Pirinjian-Leonard; Andrew Tolas; Rafael Alcalde
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 1.895

9.  New innovations in craniomaxillofacial fixation: the 2.0 lock system.

Authors:  Brian Alpert; Rolf Gutwald; Rainer Schmelzeisen
Journal:  Keio J Med       Date:  2003-06

10.  Application of a new chair-side method for the harvest of mesenchymal stem cells in a patient with nonunion of a fracture of the atrophic mandible--a case report.

Authors:  Chanchai Wongchuensoontorn; Niels Liebehenschel; Ulrich Schwarz; Rainer Schmelzeisen; Ralf Gutwald; Edward Ellis; Sebastian Sauerbier
Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg       Date:  2009-01-19       Impact factor: 2.078

View more
  1 in total

1.  Three-dimensional versus standard miniplate, lag screws versus miniplates, locking plate versus non-locking miniplates: Management of mandibular fractures, a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Patiguli Wusiman; Dilidaer Taxifulati; Li Weidong; Adili Moming
Journal:  J Dent Sci       Date:  2019-01-14       Impact factor: 2.080

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.