Literature DB >> 15633506

CT imaging, then and now: a 30-year review of the economics of computed tomography.

Wayne T Stockburger1.   

Abstract

The first computed tomography (CT) scanner in the US was installed in June 1973 at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, MN. By the end of 1974, 44 similar systems had been installed at medical facilities around the country. Less than 4 years after the introduction of CT imaging in the US, at least 400 CT systems had been installed. The practice of pneumoencephalography was eliminated. The use of nuclear medicine brain scans significantly diminished. At the time, CT imaging was limited to head studies, but with the introduction of contrast agents and full body CT systems the changes in the practice of medicine became even more significant. CT imaging was hailed by the US medical community as the greatest advance in radiology since the discovery of x-rays. But the rapid spread of CT systems, their frequency of use, and the associated increase in healthcare costs combined to draw the attention of decision-makers within the federal and state governments, specifically to establish policies regarding the acquisition and use of diagnostic technologies. Initially, CT imaging was limited to neurological applications, but in the 30 years since its inception, capabilities and applications have been expanded as a result of the advancements in technology and software development. While neurological disorders are still a common reason for CT imaging, many other medical disciplines (oncology, emergency medicine, orthopedics, etc.) have found CT imaging to be the definitive tool for diagnostic information. As such, the clinical demand for CT imaging has steadily increased. Economically, the development of CT imaging has been one of success, even in the face of governmental action to restrict its acquisition and utilization by healthcare facilities. CTimaging has increased the cost of healthcare, but in turn has added unquantifiable value to the practice of medicine in the US.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15633506

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Manage        ISSN: 0198-7097


  4 in total

1.  Chest computed tomography imaging improves potential lung donor assessment.

Authors:  Jason M Gauthier; Andrew J Bierhals; Jingxia Liu; Keki R Balsara; Christine Frederiksen; Emily Gremminger; Ramsey R Hachem; Chad A Witt; Elbert P Trulock; Derek E Byers; Roger D Yusen; Patrick R Aguilar; Gary Marklin; Ruben G Nava; Benjamin D Kozower; Michael K Pasque; Bryan F Meyers; G Alexander Patterson; Daniel Kreisel; Varun Puri
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2018-11-24       Impact factor: 5.209

2.  Imaging investigation of pancreatic cystic lesions and proposal for therapeutic guidelines.

Authors:  Atanas D Hilendarov; Georgi Petrov Deenichin; Kichka Georgieva Velkova
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2012-08-28

3.  Does femoral rotation influence anteroposterior alpha angle, lateral center-edge angle, and medial proximal femoral angle? A pilot study.

Authors:  Shafagh Monazzam; James D Bomar; Mandar Agashe; Harish S Hosalkar
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 4.  The Legacy of the TTASAAN Report-Premature Conclusions and Forgotten Promises: A Review of Policy and Practice Part I.

Authors:  Dan G Pavel; Theodore A Henderson; Simon DeBruin
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 4.086

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.