Literature DB >> 23178992

Results of extralevator abdominoperineal resection for low rectal cancer including quality of life and long-term wound complications.

Thilo Welsch1, Vyron Mategakis, Pietro Contin, Yakup Kulu, Markus W Büchler, Alexis Ulrich.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Extralevator abdominoperineal resection (APR) for low rectal cancer has been adopted by centers to improve oncological outcome. The present study aimed to investigate oncological results, wound complications, and quality of life (QoL).
METHODS: Patients who underwent extralevator APR for rectal cancer between 2007 and 2011 were identified retrospectively. QoL status was assessed using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-CR30 and CR29 questionnaires.
RESULTS: Thirty laparoscopic (n = 7) or open (n = 23) extralevator APRs were performed in 17 male and 13 female patients. The mortality was zero; circumferential margin involvement occurred in two cases (6.7 %); and there was no bowel perforation. No local recurrence was noted after a median follow-up of 28.3 months; however, six patients died, and eight developed distant metastases. Perineal wound complications were found in 46.6 % of patients, and all were managed conservatively. Fifty percent of the patients reported persistent perineal pain at the follow-up exam. QoL was assessed 7 to 46 months after surgery, and the global health status (70.6) was comparable to the EORTC reference group and published conventional APR series. The QLQ-CR29 module revealed high mean symptom scores for urinary frequency (48.1), incontinence (30.5), and impotence (79.1).
CONCLUSIONS: Extralevator APR can control local recurrence but not distant metastases of low rectal cancer. The extended perineal resection appears not to decrease general QoL, but it results in a high rate of perineal wound complications. Genitourinary functions are often impaired, even in the long term, and further improvements to the technique must seek to reduce genitourinary harm.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23178992     DOI: 10.1007/s00384-012-1611-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 0179-1958            Impact factor:   2.571


  39 in total

1.  Impact of the introduction and training of total mesorectal excision on recurrence and survival in rectal cancer in The Netherlands.

Authors:  E Kapiteijn; H Putter; C J H van de Velde
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  A prospective case-control study of extralevator abdominoperineal excision (ELAPE) of the rectum versus conventional laparoscopic and open abdominoperineal excision: comparative analysis of short-term outcomes and quality of life.

Authors:  P G Vaughan-Shaw; T Cheung; J S Knight; P H Nichols; S A Pilkington; A H Mirnezami
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 3.781

3.  Comparative quality of life in patients following abdominoperineal excision and low anterior resection for low rectal cancer.

Authors:  P How; S Stelzner; G Branagan; K Bundy; K Chandrakumaran; R J Heald; B Moran
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 4.585

4.  Focus on extralevator perineal dissection in supine position for low rectal cancer has led to better quality of surgery and oncologic outcome.

Authors:  Ingrid S Martijnse; Ralph L Dudink; Nicholas P West; Dareczka Wasowicz; Grard A Nieuwenhuijzen; Ineke van Lijnschoten; Hendrik Martijn; Valery E Lemmens; Cornelis J van de Velde; Iris D Nagtegaal; Phil Quirke; Harm J Rutten
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-08-23       Impact factor: 5.344

5.  Long-term quality of life and sexual and urinary function after abdominoperineal resection for distal rectal cancer.

Authors:  Michael S Kasparek; Imran Hassan; Robert R Cima; Dirk R Larson; Rachel E Gullerud; Bruce G Wolff
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.585

6.  Comparison of quality of life in patients undergoing abdominoperineal extirpation or anterior resection for rectal cancer.

Authors:  M M Grumann; E M Noack; I A Hoffmann; P M Schlag
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.

Authors:  J K MacFarlane; R D Ryall; R J Heald
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1993-02-20       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Abdominoperineal resection is associated with poor oncological outcome.

Authors:  W L Law; K W Chu
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 6.939

9.  Evidence of the oncologic superiority of cylindrical abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancer.

Authors:  Nicholas P West; Paul J Finan; Claes Anderin; Johan Lindholm; Torbjorn Holm; Philip Quirke
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-06-09       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Neoadjuvant treatment does not influence perioperative outcome in rectal cancer surgery.

Authors:  Alexis Ulrich; Jürgen Weitz; Matthias Slodczyk; Moritz Koch; Dirk Jaeger; Marc Münter; Markus W Büchler
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2009-03-21       Impact factor: 7.038

View more
  21 in total

1.  Extralevator abdominoperineal excision versus conventional surgery for low rectal cancer: a single surgeon experience.

Authors:  Gürel Neşşar; Ali Eba Demirbağ; Bahadır Celep; Orhan Hayri Elbir; Cüneyt Kayaalp
Journal:  Ulus Cerrahi Derg       Date:  2016-12-01

2.  Oncological superiority of extralevator abdominoperineal resection over conventional abdominoperineal resection: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ao Huang; Hongchao Zhao; Tianlong Ling; Yingjun Quan; Minhua Zheng; Bo Feng
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2014-01-03       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Long-term outcome of extralevator abdominoperineal excision (ELAPE) for low rectal cancer.

Authors:  Sigmar Stelzner; Gunter Hellmich; Anja Sims; Thomas Kittner; Eric Puffer; Joerg Zimmer; Dorothea Bleyl; Helmut Witzigmann
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2016-09-09       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Oncological and quality of life outcomes following extralevator versus standard abdominoperineal excision for rectal cancer.

Authors:  D Kamali; A Sharpe; A Musbahi; A Reddy
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 1.891

5.  Laparoscopic translevator approach to abdominoperineal resection for rectal adenocarcinoma: feasibility and short-term oncologic outcomes.

Authors:  Vanessa N Palter; Steven MacLellan; Shady Ashamalla
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Robotic Site Adjusted Levator Transection for Carcinoma of the Rectum: A Modification of the Existing Cylindrical Abdominoperineal Resection for Eccentrically Located Tumors.

Authors:  Ajit Pai; Saleh Mohamed Eftaiha; George Melich; John J Park; Pey-Yi Kevin Lin; Leela M Prasad; Slawomir J Marecik
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of pelvic reconstruction with porcine dermal collagen mesh following extra-levator abdominoperineal excision for primary rectal cancer.

Authors:  Adam Dinnewitzer; Matthias Meissnitzer; Thomas Meissnitzer; Clemens Nawara; Christoph Augschöll; Selina Buchner; Franz Mayer; Dietmar Öfner
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2015-02-21       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Quality of life in rectal cancer surgery: What do the patient ask?

Authors:  Giovanni D De Palma; Gaetano Luglio
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-12-27

9.  Similar long-term overall and disease-free survival after conventional and extralevator abdominoperineal excision-a nationwide study.

Authors:  Mads Klein; Emilie Colov; Ismail Gögenur
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Laparoscopic repair of perineal hernia after abdominoperineal excision.

Authors:  A M S Goedhart-de Haan; B S Langenhoff; D Petersen; P M Verheijen
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2015-11-30       Impact factor: 4.739

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.