Literature DB >> 25700810

Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of pelvic reconstruction with porcine dermal collagen mesh following extra-levator abdominoperineal excision for primary rectal cancer.

Adam Dinnewitzer1, Matthias Meissnitzer, Thomas Meissnitzer, Clemens Nawara, Christoph Augschöll, Selina Buchner, Franz Mayer, Dietmar Öfner.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Extra-levator abdominoperineal excision for rectal cancer includes resection of the levator ani muscle and therefore makes pelvic reconstruction advisable. The aim of our study was to evaluate morphologic and functional long-term results of pelvic floor augmentation with porcine dermal collagen mesh by dynamic magnetic resonance imaging and clinical examination.
METHODS: Twenty consecutive patients underwent perineal reconstruction with porcine dermal collagen mesh following extra-levator abdominoperineal excision for primary rectal adenocarcinoma with curative intent between 2009 and 2012. Patient perioperative and postoperative data were collected prospectively. There were one cancer-related and two noncancer-related deaths in the follow-up period, and another three patients refused the dynamic magnetic resonance imaging.
RESULTS: Fourteen patients were included in the study. The median time period from surgery to dynamic magnetic resonance imaging and clinical examination was 31 months (range 19-56). Wound infections were observed in 43% (6 of 14) of these patients in the postoperative period, but no mesh had to be removed. No focal mesh defect, no damage on the suture line, and no perineal hernia were detected on dynamic magnetic resonance imaging. Clinical examination revealed no pathological findings in any patient.
CONCLUSIONS: The implantation of a porcine dermal collagen mesh is an effective and reliable option for pelvic floor reconstruction after extra-levator abdominoperineal excision. Despite a high incidence of primary wound infections, the healing rate was satisfactory, no mesh had to be removed, and long-term stability could be achieved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25700810     DOI: 10.1007/s00384-015-2169-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 0179-1958            Impact factor:   2.571


  31 in total

1.  Perineal hernia after proctectomy: prevalence, risks, and management.

Authors:  E Aboian; D C Winter; D R Metcalf; B G Wolff
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 4.585

2.  Acellular porcine cross-linked dermal collagen may be a valuable graft for pelvic floor reconstruction after extended resection.

Authors:  Michael Oberwalder; Raimund Margreiter; Herbert T Maier; Matthias Zitt; Dietmar Ofner
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2008-12-16       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Abdominoperineal excision of the rectum--an endangered operation. Norman Nigro Lectureship.

Authors:  R J Heald; R K Smedh; A Kald; R Sexton; B J Moran
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 4.585

4.  Extended abdominoperineal resection with gluteus maximus flap reconstruction of the pelvic floor for rectal cancer.

Authors:  T Holm; A Ljung; T Häggmark; G Jurell; J Lagergren
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  The prevalence of pelvic floor disorders and their relationship to gender, age, parity and mode of delivery.

Authors:  A H MacLennan; A W Taylor; D H Wilson; D Wilson
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 6.531

6.  Physical performance and quality of life after extended abdominoperineal excision of rectum and reconstruction of the pelvic floor with gluteus maximus flap.

Authors:  Markku M Haapamäki; Victoria Pihlgren; Owe Lundberg; Birger Sandzén; Jörgen Rutegård
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.585

7.  Pelvic floor reconstruction with a biological mesh after extralevator abdominoperineal excision leads to few perineal hernias and acceptable wound complication rates with minor movement limitations: single-centre experience including clinical examination and interview.

Authors:  K K Jensen; L Rashid; B Pilsgaard; P Møller; P Wille-Jørgensen
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 3.788

8.  Assessment and grading of pelvic organ prolapse by use of dynamic magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  K Singh; W M Reid; L A Berger
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 9.  Dynamic MR imaging of pelvic organ prolapse: spectrum of abnormalities.

Authors:  H K Pannu; H S Kaufman; G W Cundiff; R Genadry; D A Bluemke; E K Fishman
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2000 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.333

10.  Extralevator abdominoperineal excision (ELAPE) for rectal cancer--short-term results from the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry. Selective use of ELAPE warranted.

Authors:  Mattias Prytz; Eva Angenete; Jan Ekelund; Eva Haglind
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2014-06-21       Impact factor: 2.571

View more
  2 in total

1.  Long-term outcomes of biological mesh repair following extra levator abdominoperineal excision of the rectum: an observational study of 100 patients.

Authors:  P W Thomas; J E M Blackwell; P J J Herrod; O Peacock; R Singh; J P Williams; N G Hurst; W J Speake; A Bhalla; J N Lund
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 3.781

2.  Simultaneous stoma reinforcement and perineal reconstruction with biological mesh - A multicentre prospective observational study.

Authors:  Muhammad Imran Aslam; Naseer Baloch; Christopher Mann; Per J Nilsson; Pierre Maina; Sanjay Chaudhri; Baljit Singh
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2018-12-21
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.