Literature DB >> 27778072

Robotic Site Adjusted Levator Transection for Carcinoma of the Rectum: A Modification of the Existing Cylindrical Abdominoperineal Resection for Eccentrically Located Tumors.

Ajit Pai1,2, Saleh Mohamed Eftaiha3, George Melich1,4, John J Park1, Pey-Yi Kevin Lin1, Leela M Prasad1,5, Slawomir J Marecik1,5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Today, extralevator abdominoperineal resection is the standard of care for low rectal cancers with sphincter involvement or location precluding anastomosis. This procedure, while effective from an oncologic point of view, is morbid, with a high incidence of wound complications and genitourinary, and sexual dysfunction. We present a modification of this procedure via a robotic approach, which maintains the radicality while reducing the soft tissue loss and potentially the morbidity.
METHODS: Over a 2-year period, five patients (four men and one woman) with eccentric low rectal cancers following neoadjuvant chemoradiation underwent a robot-assisted modified abdominoperineal resection with wide levator transection on the tumor side and conservative levator division on the opposite side. These patients were prospectively followed. Perioperative outcomes, pathologic specimen measures, wound-related problems, and local and systemic recurrences were documented and analyzed.
RESULTS: All procedures were successfully completed without conversion. Average body mass index was 32 kg/m2. The mean operative time and blood loss were 370 min and 130 ml, respectively. All specimens had an intact mesorectal envelope with no tumor perforations, and the mean lymph node yield was 16. There were no urinary complications or perineal wound infections. At a median follow-up of 14 months, all patients remain disease-free.
CONCLUSIONS: Modified robotic cylindrical abdominoperineal resection with site adjusted levator transection for rectal cancer is an oncologically sound operation in eccentrically located tumors. It maintains the radicality of conventional extralevator abdominoperineal resection, while also reducing the soft tissue loss and thereby potentially the morbidity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27778072     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-016-3735-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  11 in total

1.  Extended abdominoperineal resection with gluteus maximus flap reconstruction of the pelvic floor for rectal cancer.

Authors:  T Holm; A Ljung; T Häggmark; G Jurell; J Lagergren
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Classic articles in colonic and rectal surgery. A method of performing abdominoperineal excision for carcinoma of the rectum and of the terminal portion of the pelvic colon: by W. Ernest Miles, 1869-1947.

Authors:  M L Corman
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1980-04       Impact factor: 4.585

Review 3.  Extended abdominoperineal excision vs. standard abdominoperineal excision in rectal cancer--a systematic overview.

Authors:  Sigmar Stelzner; Carsta Koehler; Juliane Stelzer; Anja Sims; Helmut Witzigmann
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2011-05-21       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Robotic cylindrical abdominoperineal resection with transabdominal levator transection.

Authors:  Slawomir J Marecik; Marek Zawadzki; Ashwin L Desouza; John J Park; Herand Abcarian; Leela M Prasad
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 4.585

5.  Intra-operative perforation is an important predictor of local recurrence and impaired survival after abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer.

Authors:  S Bülow; I J Christensen; L H Iversen; H Harling
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 3.788

6.  Impact of robotic surgery on sexual and urinary functions after fully robotic nerve-sparing total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Fabrizio Luca; Manuela Valvo; Tiago Leal Ghezzi; Massimiliano Zuccaro; Sabina Cenciarelli; Cristina Trovato; Angelica Sonzogni; Roberto Biffi
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Evidence of the oncologic superiority of cylindrical abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancer.

Authors:  Nicholas P West; Paul J Finan; Claes Anderin; Johan Lindholm; Torbjorn Holm; Philip Quirke
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-06-09       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Randomized clinical trial of conventional versus cylindrical abdominoperineal resection for locally advanced lower rectal cancer.

Authors:  Jia Gang Han; Zhen Jun Wang; Guang Hui Wei; Zhi Gang Gao; Yong Yang; Bao Cheng Zhao
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 2.565

9.  The abdominoperineal resection itself is associated with an adverse outcome: the European experience based on a pooled analysis of five European randomised clinical trials on rectal cancer.

Authors:  Marcel den Dulk; Hein Putter; Laurence Collette; Corrie A M Marijnen; Joakim Folkesson; Jean-Francois Bosset; Claus Rödel; Krzysztof Bujko; Lars Påhlman; Cornelis J H van de Velde
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2009-01-06       Impact factor: 9.162

10.  Results of extralevator abdominoperineal resection for low rectal cancer including quality of life and long-term wound complications.

Authors:  Thilo Welsch; Vyron Mategakis; Pietro Contin; Yakup Kulu; Markus W Büchler; Alexis Ulrich
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 2.571

View more
  2 in total

1.  Preliminary Outcome of Individualized Abdominoperineal Excision for Locally Advanced Low Rectal Cancer.

Authors:  Yi Zheng; Jia-Gang Han; Zhen-Jun Wang; Zhi-Gang Gao; Guang-Hui Wei; Zhi-Wei Zhai; Bao-Cheng Zhao
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 2.628

Review 2.  Extralevator abdominoperineal excision for advanced low rectal cancer: Where to go.

Authors:  Yu Tao; Jia-Gang Han; Zhen-Jun Wang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-06-14       Impact factor: 5.742

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.