Literature DB >> 26730279

Quality of life in rectal cancer surgery: What do the patient ask?

Giovanni D De Palma1, Gaetano Luglio1.   

Abstract

Rectal cancer surgery has dramatically changed with the introduction of the total mesorectal excision (TME), which has demonstrated to significantly reduce the risk of local recurrence. The combination of TME with radiochemotherapy has led to a reduction of local failure to less than 5%. On the other hand, surgery for rectal cancer is also impaired by the potential for a significant loss in quality of life. This is a new challenge surgeons should think about nowadays: If patients live more, they also want to live better. The fight against cancer cannot only be based on survival, recurrence rate and other oncological endpoints. Patients are also asking for a decent quality of life. Rectal cancer is probably a paradigmatic example: Its treatment is often associated with the loss or severe impairment of faecal function, alteration of body anatomy, urogenital problems and, sometimes, intractable pain. The evolution of laparoscopic colorectal surgery in the last decades is an important example, which emphasizes the importance that themes like scar, recovery, pain and quality of life might play for patients. The attention to quality of life from both patients and surgeons led to several surgical innovations in the treatment of rectal cancer: Sphincter saving procedures, reservoir techniques (pouch and coloplasty) to mitigate postoperative faecal disorders, nerve-sparing techniques to reduce the risk for sexual dysfunction. Even more conservative procedures have been proposed alternatively to the abdominal-perineal resection, like the local excisions or transanal endoscopic microsurgery, till the possibility of a wait and see approach in selected cases after radiation therapy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Laparoscopic surgery; Nerve-sparing; Quality of life; Rectal cancer; Sphincter preservation

Year:  2015        PMID: 26730279      PMCID: PMC4691714          DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v7.i12.349

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg


  68 in total

1.  Clinical effects of preoperative radiation therapy on anorectal function after proctectomy and colonic J-pouch-anal anastomosis.

Authors:  Nidal Dehni; Deborah A McNamara; Rodulfo D Schlegel; Marguerite Guiguet; Emmanuel Tiret; Rolland Parc
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.585

2.  Colonic J-pouch anal anastomosis after ultralow anterior resection with upper sphincter excision for low-lying rectal cancer.

Authors:  Jae-Gahb Park; Min-Ro Lee; Seok-Byung Lim; Chang-Won Hong; Sang-Nam Yoon; Sung-Bum Kang; Seung-Chul Heo; Seung-Yong Jeong; Kyu-Joo Park
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-05-07       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Survival after laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: long-term outcome of a randomised clinical trial.

Authors:  Mark Buunen; Ruben Veldkamp; Wim C J Hop; Esther Kuhry; Johannes Jeekel; Eva Haglind; Lars Påhlman; Miguel A Cuesta; Simon Msika; Mario Morino; Antonio Lacy; Hendrik J Bonjer
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2008-12-13       Impact factor: 41.316

4.  Immediate radical resection after local excision of rectal cancer: an oncologic compromise?

Authors:  Dieter Hahnloser; Bruce G Wolff; David W Larson; Jennifer Ping; Santhat Nivatvongs
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 4.585

5.  Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer is not inferior to open surgery based on 5-year data from the COST Study Group trial.

Authors:  James Fleshman; Daniel J Sargent; Erin Green; Mehran Anvari; Steven J Stryker; Robert W Beart; Michael Hellinger; Richard Flanagan; Walter Peters; Heidi Nelson
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Radical prostatectomy with preservation of sexual function: anatomical and pathological considerations.

Authors:  P C Walsh; H Lepor; J C Eggleston
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 4.104

7.  Resection of the rectum with construction of a colonic reservoir and colo-anal anastomosis for carcinoma of the rectum.

Authors:  F Lazorthes; P Fages; P Chiotasso; J Lemozy; E Bloom
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 6.939

8.  Loop ileostomy following anterior resection: is it really temporary?

Authors:  G G David; J P Slavin; S Willmott; D J Corless; A U Khan; C R Selvasekar
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2009-02-17       Impact factor: 3.788

9.  The mesorectum in rectal cancer surgery--the clue to pelvic recurrence?

Authors:  R J Heald; E M Husband; R D Ryall
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 6.939

10.  Laparoscopic colorectal surgery in learning curve: Role of implementation of a standardized technique and recovery protocol. A cohort study.

Authors:  Gaetano Luglio; Giovanni Domenico De Palma; Rachele Tarquini; Mariano Cesare Giglio; Viviana Sollazzo; Emanuela Esposito; Emanuela Spadarella; Roberto Peltrini; Filomena Liccardo; Luigi Bucci
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2015-03-20
View more
  2 in total

1.  Ileostomy reversal with handsewn techniques. Short-term outcomes in a teaching hospital.

Authors:  Gaetano Luglio; Francesco Terracciano; Mariano Cesare Giglio; Michele Sacco; Roberto Peltrini; Viviana Sollazzo; Emanuela Spadarella; Cristina Bucci; Giovanni Domenico De Palma; Luigi Bucci
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2016-09-06       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Oncological Outcomes and Quality of Life After Rectal Cancer Surgery.

Authors:  Roberto Peltrini; Gaetano Luglio; Gianluca Cassese; Alfonso Amendola; Emanuele Caruso; Michele Sacco; Gianluca Pagano; Viviana Sollazzo; Antonio Tufano; Mariano Cesare Giglio; Luigi Bucci; Giovanni Domenico De Palma
Journal:  Open Med (Wars)       Date:  2019-09-12
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.