Literature DB >> 23178592

OCT4/SOX2-independent Nanog autorepression modulates heterogeneous Nanog gene expression in mouse ES cells.

Pablo Navarro1, Nicola Festuccia, Douglas Colby, Alessia Gagliardi, Nicholas P Mullin, Wensheng Zhang, Violetta Karwacki-Neisius, Rodrigo Osorno, David Kelly, Morag Robertson, Ian Chambers.   

Abstract

NANOG, OCT4 and SOX2 form the core network of transcription factors supporting embryonic stem (ES) cell self-renewal. While OCT4 and SOX2 expression is relatively uniform, ES cells fluctuate between states of high NANOG expression possessing high self-renewal efficiency, and low NANOG expression exhibiting increased differentiation propensity. NANOG, OCT4 and SOX2 are currently considered to activate transcription of each of the three genes, an architecture that cannot readily account for NANOG heterogeneity. Here, we examine the architecture of the Nanog-centred network using inducible NANOG gain- and loss-of-function approaches. Rather than activating itself, Nanog activity is autorepressive and OCT4/SOX2-independent. Moreover, the influence of Nanog on Oct4 and Sox2 expression is minimal. Using Nanog:GFP reporters, we show that Nanog autorepression is a major regulator of Nanog transcription switching. We conclude that the architecture of the pluripotency gene regulatory network encodes the capacity to generate reversible states of Nanog transcription via a Nanog-centred autorepressive loop. Therefore, cellular variability in self-renewal efficiency is an emergent property of the pluripotency gene regulatory network.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23178592      PMCID: PMC3545296          DOI: 10.1038/emboj.2012.321

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  EMBO J        ISSN: 0261-4189            Impact factor:   11.598


  43 in total

1.  Early lineage segregation between epiblast and primitive endoderm in mouse blastocysts through the Grb2-MAPK pathway.

Authors:  Claire Chazaud; Yojiro Yamanaka; Tony Pawson; Janet Rossant
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 12.270

2.  A heterogeneous expression pattern for Nanog in embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  Amar M Singh; Takashi Hamazaki; Katherine E Hankowski; Naohiro Terada
Journal:  Stem Cells       Date:  2007-07-05       Impact factor: 6.277

Review 3.  Non-genetic heterogeneity of cells in development: more than just noise.

Authors:  Sui Huang
Journal:  Development       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 6.868

4.  Zfp281 mediates Nanog autorepression through recruitment of the NuRD complex and inhibits somatic cell reprogramming.

Authors:  Miguel Fidalgo; Francesco Faiola; Carlos-Filipe Pereira; Junjun Ding; Arven Saunders; Julian Gingold; Christoph Schaniel; Ihor R Lemischka; José C R Silva; Jianlong Wang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-09-17       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  The ground state of pluripotency.

Authors:  Jason Wray; Tuzer Kalkan; Austin G Smith
Journal:  Biochem Soc Trans       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 5.407

6.  Suppression of Erk signalling promotes ground state pluripotency in the mouse embryo.

Authors:  Jennifer Nichols; Jose Silva; Mila Roode; Austin Smith
Journal:  Development       Date:  2009-08-26       Impact factor: 6.868

7.  Distinct sequential cell behaviours direct primitive endoderm formation in the mouse blastocyst.

Authors:  Berenika Plusa; Anna Piliszek; Stephen Frankenberg; Jérôme Artus; Anna-Katerina Hadjantonakis
Journal:  Development       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 6.868

8.  The origin and identity of embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  Jennifer Nichols; Austin Smith
Journal:  Development       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 6.868

9.  An extended transcriptional network for pluripotency of embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  Jonghwan Kim; Jianlin Chu; Xiaohua Shen; Jianlong Wang; Stuart H Orkin
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2008-03-21       Impact factor: 41.582

10.  Capturing pluripotency.

Authors:  Jose Silva; Austin Smith
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2008-02-22       Impact factor: 41.582

View more
  59 in total

1.  Network plasticity of pluripotency transcription factors in embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  Adam Filipczyk; Carsten Marr; Simon Hastreiter; Justin Feigelman; Michael Schwarzfischer; Philipp S Hoppe; Dirk Loeffler; Konstantinos D Kokkaliaris; Max Endele; Bernhard Schauberger; Oliver Hilsenbeck; Stavroula Skylaki; Jan Hasenauer; Konstantinos Anastassiadis; Fabian J Theis; Timm Schroeder
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 28.824

Review 2.  Concise review: pursuing self-renewal and pluripotency with the stem cell factor Nanog.

Authors:  Arven Saunders; Francesco Faiola; Jianlong Wang
Journal:  Stem Cells       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 6.277

3.  Somatic Pluripotent Genes in Tissue Repair, Developmental Disease, and Cancer.

Authors:  Hannah Wollenzien; Ellen Voigt; Michael S Kareta
Journal:  SPG Biomed       Date:  2018-10-28

Review 4.  A close look at the mammalian blastocyst: epiblast and primitive endoderm formation.

Authors:  Jérôme Artus; Claire Chazaud
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2014-05-04       Impact factor: 9.261

Review 5.  Master regulators in development: Views from the Drosophila retinal determination and mammalian pluripotency gene networks.

Authors:  Trevor L Davis; Ilaria Rebay
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2016-12-13       Impact factor: 3.582

6.  Heterogeneities in Nanog Expression Drive Stable Commitment to Pluripotency in the Mouse Blastocyst.

Authors:  Panagiotis Xenopoulos; Minjung Kang; Alberto Puliafito; Stefano Di Talia; Anna-Katerina Hadjantonakis
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 9.423

7.  Pluripotency gene network dynamics: System views from parametric analysis.

Authors:  Ilya R Akberdin; Nadezda A Omelyanchuk; Stanislav I Fadeev; Natalya E Leskova; Evgeniya A Oschepkova; Fedor V Kazantsev; Yury G Matushkin; Dmitry A Afonnikov; Nikolay A Kolchanov
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-29       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Reprogramming multistable monotone systems with application to cell fate control.

Authors:  Rushina Shah; Domitilla Del Vecchio
Journal:  IEEE Trans Netw Sci Eng       Date:  2020-07-09

9.  Reversible Disruption of Specific Transcription Factor-DNA Interactions Using CRISPR/Cas9.

Authors:  S Ali Shariati; Antonia Dominguez; Shicong Xie; Marius Wernig; Lei S Qi; Jan M Skotheim
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2019-05-02       Impact factor: 17.970

Review 10.  Anatomy of a blastocyst: cell behaviors driving cell fate choice and morphogenesis in the early mouse embryo.

Authors:  Nadine Schrode; Panagiotis Xenopoulos; Anna Piliszek; Stephen Frankenberg; Berenika Plusa; Anna-Katerina Hadjantonakis
Journal:  Genesis       Date:  2013-02-25       Impact factor: 2.487

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.