Literature DB >> 23177265

Women's preferences for contraceptive counseling and decision making.

Christine Dehlendorf1, Kira Levy, Allison Kelley, Kevin Grumbach, Jody Steinauer.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Little is known about what women value in their interactions with family planning providers and in decision making about contraception. STUDY
DESIGN: We conducted semistructured interviews with 42 black, white and Latina patients. Transcripts were coded using modified grounded theory.
RESULTS: While women wanted control over the ultimate selection of a method, most also wanted their provider to participate in the decision-making process in a way that emphasized the women's values and preferences. Women desired an intimate, friend-like relationship with their providers and also wanted to receive comprehensive information about options, particularly about side effects. More black and Spanish-speaking Latinas, as compared to whites and English-speaking Latinas, felt that providers should only share their opinion if it is elicited by a patient or if they make their rationale clear to the patient.
CONCLUSION: While, in the absence of medical contraindications, decision making about contraception has often been conceptualized as a woman's autonomous decision, our data indicate that providers of contraceptive counseling can participate in the decision-making process within limits. Differences in preferences seen by race/ethnicity illustrate one example of the importance of individualizing counseling to match women's preferences.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Contraception; Counseling; Patient preferences; Race/ethnicity; Shared decision making

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23177265      PMCID: PMC4026257          DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2012.10.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contraception        ISSN: 0010-7824            Impact factor:   3.375


  37 in total

1.  Informed policy making for the prevention of unwanted pregnancy. Understanding low-income women's experiences with family planning.

Authors:  C Chetkovich; J Mauldon; C Brindis; S Guendelman
Journal:  Eval Rev       Date:  1999-10

2.  Nonspecific side effects of oral contraceptives: nocebo or noise?

Authors:  David A Grimes; Kenneth F Schulz
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 3.375

3.  Unintended pregnancy in the United States: incidence and disparities, 2006.

Authors:  Lawrence B Finer; Mia R Zolna
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2011-08-24       Impact factor: 3.375

4.  Preferences for decision-making about contraception and general health care among reproductive age women at an abortion clinic.

Authors:  Christine Dehlendorf; Justin Diedrich; Eleanor Drey; Ariel Postone; Jody Steinauer
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2010-07-21

5.  Factors affecting continuation rates of DMPA.

Authors:  D Hubacher; N Goco; B Gonzalez; D Taylor
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.375

6.  Use of contraception in the United States: 1982-2008.

Authors:  William D Mosher; Jo Jones
Journal:  Vital Health Stat 23       Date:  2010-08

7.  Comparison of contraceptive use between the Contraceptive CHOICE Project and state and national data.

Authors:  Nupur D Kittur; Gina M Secura; Jeffrey F Peipert; Tessa Madden; Lawrence B Finer; Jenifer E Allsworth
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2010-11-23       Impact factor: 3.375

8.  Determinants of early implant discontinuation among low-income women.

Authors:  D Kalmuss; A R Davidson; L F Cushman; S Heartwell; M Rulin
Journal:  Fam Plann Perspect       Date:  1996 Nov-Dec

Review 9.  How does communication heal? Pathways linking clinician-patient communication to health outcomes.

Authors:  Richard L Street; Gregory Makoul; Neeraj K Arora; Ronald M Epstein
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2009-01-15

10.  Estimates of contraceptive failure from the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth.

Authors:  Kathryn Kost; Susheela Singh; Barbara Vaughan; James Trussell; Akinrinola Bankole
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2007-12-03       Impact factor: 3.375

View more
  67 in total

1.  Provider Bias in Long-Acting Reversible Contraception (LARC) Promotion and Removal: Perceptions of Young Adult Women.

Authors:  Jenny A Higgins; Renee D Kramer; Kristin M Ryder
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Family planning providers' role in offering PrEP to women.

Authors:  Dominika Seidman; Shannon Weber; Kimberly Carlson; Jacki Witt
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 3.375

Review 3.  Contraceptive counseling: best practices to ensure quality communication and enable effective contraceptive use.

Authors:  Christine Dehlendorf; Colleen Krajewski; Sonya Borrero
Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 2.190

4.  Contesting and Differentially Constructing Uncertainty: Negotiations of Contraceptive Use in the Clinical Encounter.

Authors:  Krystale E Littlejohn; Katrina Kimport
Journal:  J Health Soc Behav       Date:  2017-10-16

5.  An interactive website to aid young women's choice of contraception: feasibility and efficacy RCT.

Authors:  Judith Stephenson; Julia V Bailey; Ann Blandford; Nataliya Brima; Andrew Copas; Preethy D'Souza; Anasztazia Gubijev; Rachael Hunter; Jill Shawe; Greta Rait; Sandy Oliver
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 4.014

6.  Contraceptive Decision Making Among Latina Immigrants: Developing Theory-Based Survey Items.

Authors:  Diana N Carvajal; Paola C Rivera Mudafort; Beth Barnet; Arthur E Blank
Journal:  Hisp Health Care Int       Date:  2019-10-24

7.  Understanding Barriers to Contraception Screening and Referral in Female Adolescents and Young Adults with Cancer.

Authors:  Sarah F Lindsay; Elisabeth J Woodhams; Katharine O White; Mari-Lynn Drainoni; Natrina L Johnson; Leanne Yinusa-Nyahkoon
Journal:  J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol       Date:  2019-10-21       Impact factor: 2.223

8.  Telephone or integrated contraception counselling before abortion: impact on method choice and receipt.

Authors:  Patricia A Lohr; Abigail R A Aiken; Tracey Forsyth; James Trussell
Journal:  BMJ Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2018-02-03

9.  "I don't know enough to feel comfortable using them:" Women's knowledge of and perceived barriers to long-acting reversible contraceptives on a college campus.

Authors:  Kelli Stidham Hall; Elizabeth Ela; Melissa K Zochowski; Amy Caldwell; Michelle Moniz; Laura McAndrew; Monique Steel; Sneha Challa; Vanessa K Dalton; Susan Ernst
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2016-02-13       Impact factor: 3.375

10.  Contraceptive Initiation Among Women in the United States: Timing, Methods Used, and Pregnancy Outcomes.

Authors:  Mara E Murray Horwitz; Dennis Ross-Degnan; Lydia E Pace
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2019-01-15       Impact factor: 7.124

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.