Literature DB >> 21134497

Nonspecific side effects of oral contraceptives: nocebo or noise?

David A Grimes1, Kenneth F Schulz.   

Abstract

Side effects of combined oral contraceptives are the most common reason why women discontinue them. Over the past half century, an elaborate mythology about these ill effects has evolved, fueled by rumor, gossip and poor-quality research. In contrast, placebo-controlled randomized trials document that nonspecific side effects are not significantly more common with combined oral contraceptives than with inert pills. These reported nonspecific side effects may reflect the nocebo phenomenon (the inverse of a placebo): if women are told to expect noxious side effects, these complaints occur because of the power of suggestion. Alternatively, nonspecific complaints may simply reflect their background prevalence in the population. Because Level I evidence documents no important increase in nonspecific side effects with oral contraceptives, counseling about these side effects or including them in package labeling is unwarranted and probably unethical. When in doubt, clinicians should err on the side of optimism.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21134497     DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2010.06.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contraception        ISSN: 0010-7824            Impact factor:   3.375


  23 in total

Review 1.  Nocebo in headaches: implications for clinical practice and trial design.

Authors:  Dimos D Mitsikostas
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 5.081

Review 2.  The levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system in heavy menstrual bleeding: a benefit-risk review.

Authors:  Andrew M Kaunitz; Pirjo Inki
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2012-01-22       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 3.  Contraceptive counseling: best practices to ensure quality communication and enable effective contraceptive use.

Authors:  Christine Dehlendorf; Colleen Krajewski; Sonya Borrero
Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 2.190

4.  Contesting and Differentially Constructing Uncertainty: Negotiations of Contraceptive Use in the Clinical Encounter.

Authors:  Krystale E Littlejohn; Katrina Kimport
Journal:  J Health Soc Behav       Date:  2017-10-16

Review 5.  The nocebo effect and its relevance for clinical practice.

Authors:  Luana Colloca; Franklin G Miller
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  2011-08-23       Impact factor: 4.312

6.  To tell the truth, the whole truth, may do patients harm: the problem of the nocebo effect for informed consent.

Authors:  Rebecca Erwin Wells; Ted J Kaptchuk
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 11.229

Review 7.  Impact of Contraceptive Education on Contraceptive Knowledge and Decision Making: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Karen Pazol; Lauren B Zapata; Stephen J Tregear; Nancy Mautone-Smith; Loretta E Gavin
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 5.043

8.  The impact of an educational text message intervention on young urban women's knowledge of oral contraception.

Authors:  Kelli Stidham Hall; Carolyn L Westhoff; Paula M Castaño
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2012-10-10       Impact factor: 3.375

9.  The influence of oral contraceptive knowledge on oral contraceptive continuation among young women.

Authors:  Kelli Stidham Hall; Paula M Castaño; Carolyn L Westhoff
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 2.681

10.  Women's preferences for contraceptive counseling and decision making.

Authors:  Christine Dehlendorf; Kira Levy; Allison Kelley; Kevin Grumbach; Jody Steinauer
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 3.375

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.