Literature DB >> 23164385

[11C]choline positron emission tomography/computerized tomography for early detection of prostate cancer recurrence in patients with low increasing prostate specific antigen.

Giampiero Giovacchini1, Maria Picchio, Rita Garcia-Parra, Paola Mapelli, Alberto Briganti, Francesco Montorsi, Luigi Gianolli, Cristina Messa.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The effectiveness of salvage therapy in prostate cancer is greater for low prostate specific antigen values. Therefore, early detection of tumor recurrence is warranted. [(11)C]choline positron emission tomography/computerized tomography has the potential of early restaging of prostate cancer with low prostate specific antigen, but the selection of patients at high risk for positive [(11)C]choline positron emission tomography/computerized tomography is desirable to optimize salvage therapy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included 75 patients with prostate cancer with an increasing prostate specific antigen less than 1.5 ng/ml after radical prostatectomy who never received antiandrogen deprivation therapy or salvage radiotherapy who underwent [(11)C]choline positron emission tomography/computerized tomography for the restaging of disease. Binary logistic regression was used to assess predictive factors of positive [(11)C]choline positron emission tomography/computerized tomography. Included variables were trigger prostate specific antigen, prostate specific antigen doubling time, age, pathological stage and Gleason score.
RESULTS: Median prostate specific antigen was 0.61 ng/ml. [(11)C]choline positron emission tomography/computerized tomography was positive in 16 of 75 patients (21%). On univariate analysis prostate specific antigen doubling time less than 6 months was the only factor significantly associated with an increased risk of positive [(11)C]choline positron emission tomography/computerized tomography (OR 7.77, 95% CI 2.34-25.80, p = 0.001). In patients with prostate specific antigen doubling time less than 6 months, the positive detection rate of [(11)C]choline positron emission tomography/computerized tomography increased to 50%.
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with prostate cancer with biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy and prostate specific antigen less than 1.5 ng/ml, prostate specific antigen doubling time less than 6 months predicts positive [(11)C]choline positron emission tomography/computerized tomography. In these patients [(11)C]choline positron emission tomography/computerized tomography may reduce by 50% the number in whom salvage therapy is initiated empirically without knowing the disease location.
Copyright © 2013 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23164385     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.09.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  20 in total

1.  Writing PET into existence.

Authors:  A Chiti; M Kirienko; E Incerti; M Picchio
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2013-09-27       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Prostate cancer recurrence: can PSA guide imaging?

Authors:  P Mapelli; V Panebianco; Maria Picchio
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2015-07-09       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 3.  PET and PET/CT with radiolabeled choline in prostate cancer: a critical reappraisal of 20 years of clinical studies.

Authors:  Giampiero Giovacchini; Elisabetta Giovannini; Rossella Leoncini; Mattia Riondato; Andrea Ciarmiello
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-04-14       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 4.  68Ga-PSMA-PET: added value and future applications in comparison to the current use of choline-PET and mpMRI in the workup of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Simona Malaspina; Ugo De Giorgi; Jukka Kemppainen; Angelo Del Sole; Giovanni Paganelli
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2018-08-16       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 5.  PET Tracers Beyond FDG in Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  David M Schuster; Cristina Nanni; Stefano Fanti
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  2016-09-07       Impact factor: 4.446

6.  Recurrent prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy: restaging performance of 18F-choline hybrid PET/MRI.

Authors:  Verane Achard; Giorgio Lamanna; Antoine Denis; Thomas De Perrot; Ismini Charis Mainta; Osman Ratib; Christophe Iselin; Raymond Miralbell; Valentina Garibotto; Thomas Zilli
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2019-06-12       Impact factor: 3.064

7.  11C-choline PET/CT predicts survival in prostate cancer patients with PSA < 1 NG/ml.

Authors:  Giampiero Giovacchini; Priscilla Guglielmo; Paola Mapelli; Elena Incerti; Ana Maria Samanes Gajate; Elisabetta Giovannini; Mattia Riondato; Alberto Briganti; Luigi Gianolli; Andrea Ciarmiello; Maria Picchio
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2019-01-10       Impact factor: 9.236

8.  The relationship between local recurrences and distant metastases in prostate cancer: can 11C-choline PET/CT contribute to understand the link?

Authors:  Giampiero Giovacchini; Andrea Ciarmiello; Elisabetta Giovannini; Andrei Fodor; Cesare Cozzarini; Paola Mapelli; Elena Incerti; Nadia Di Muzio; Luigi Gianolli; Maria Picchio
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-02-16       Impact factor: 9.236

9.  First imaging results of an intraindividual comparison of (11)C-acetate and (18)F-fluorocholine PET/CT in patients with prostate cancer at early biochemical first or second relapse after prostatectomy or radiotherapy.

Authors:  Franz Buchegger; Valentina Garibotto; Thomas Zilli; Laurent Allainmat; Sandra Jorcano; Hansjörg Vees; Olivier Rager; Charles Steiner; Habib Zaidi; Yann Seimbille; Osman Ratib; Raymond Miralbell
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2013-10-09       Impact factor: 9.236

10.  Comparison of meta-analyses among elastosonography (ES) and positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) imaging techniques in the application of prostate cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  Qiaohong Ouyang; Zhongxiang Duan; Jixiao Lei; Guangli Jiao
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2015-09-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.