Literature DB >> 31190232

Recurrent prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy: restaging performance of 18F-choline hybrid PET/MRI.

Verane Achard1, Giorgio Lamanna1, Antoine Denis2, Thomas De Perrot3, Ismini Charis Mainta2, Osman Ratib2, Christophe Iselin4, Raymond Miralbell1, Valentina Garibotto2, Thomas Zilli5.   

Abstract

To evaluate the diagnostic performance of a whole-body 18F-choline (FCH) hybrid PET/MRI for prostate cancer patients at biochemical relapse after radical prostatectomy (RP) compared to pelvic multiparametric MRI (mpMRI), one of the standard imaging modality for this patient population. From 2010 to 2016, 58 whole-body FCH PET/MRI studies with mpMRI acquisitions were performed in 53 prostate cancer patients relapsing after curative RP. Median PSA and PSA doubling time (PSA DT) at PET study were 1.5 ng/ml and 6.5 months, respectively. The overall positivity rate of FCH PET/MRI was 58.6% (n = 34), dropping to 44% in patients with a PSA ≤ 2 ng/ml (n = 36). Median PSA values in positive and negative PET/MRI studies were 2.2 ng/ml and 0.8 ng/ml, respectively, with no differences in PSA DT (6.5 vs. 6.6 months). A PSA value ≥ 1.5 ng/ml was a significant predictor of positivity on PET/MRI studies. Compared to PET, mpMRI identified more local relapses (17 vs. 14, p = 0.453) while PET outperformed whole-body Dixon MRI for regional (16 vs. 9, p = 0.016) and distant (12 vs. 6, p = 0.031) metastases. Compared to pelvic mpMRI, the treatment approach turned out to be influenced more frequently using whole-body FCH hybrid PET/MRI studies (58.6% vs. 38%). In prostate cancer patients with biochemical recurrence after RP, whole-body FCH PET/MRI achieved a higher detection rate of nodal/distant metastases compared to pelvic mpMRI alone, increasing the change of treatment strategy by more than 20%.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biochemical recurrence; Pelvic mpMRI; Prostate cancer; Radical prostatectomy; Whole-body FCH hybrid PET/MRI

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31190232     DOI: 10.1007/s12032-019-1291-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Oncol        ISSN: 1357-0560            Impact factor:   3.064


  35 in total

1.  Influence of PSA, PSA velocity and PSA doubling time on contrast-enhanced 18F-choline PET/CT detection rate in patients with rising PSA after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Orazio Schillaci; Ferdinando Calabria; Mario Tavolozza; Cristiana Ragano Caracciolo; Enrico Finazzi Agrò; Roberto Miano; Antonio Orlacchio; Roberta Danieli; Giovanni Simonetti
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2012-01-10       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Approaches for the optimization of MR protocols in clinical hybrid PET/MRI studies.

Authors:  Maria-Isabel Vargas; Minerva Becker; Valentina Garibotto; Susanne Heinzer; Pierre Loubeyre; Joanna Gariani; Karl Lovblad; Jean-Paul Vallée; Osman Ratib
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2012-09-25       Impact factor: 2.310

3.  Impact of total PSA, PSA doubling time and PSA velocity on detection rates of 11C-Choline positron emission tomography in recurrent prostate cancer.

Authors:  Maxim Rybalov; Anthonius J Breeuwsma; Anna M Leliveld; Jan Pruim; Rudi A Dierckx; Igle J de Jong
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2012-07-20       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Natural history of progression after PSA elevation following radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  C R Pound; A W Partin; M A Eisenberger; D W Chan; J D Pearson; P C Walsh
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-05-05       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Evaluation of the prostate bed for local recurrence after radical prostatectomy using endorectal magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Stanley L Liauw; Sean P Pitroda; Scott E Eggener; Walter M Stadler; Charles A Pelizzari; Michael W Vannier; Aytek Oto
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2012-06-18       Impact factor: 7.038

6.  Prostate cancer: 1HMRS-DCEMR at 3T versus [(18)F]choline PET/CT in the detection of local prostate cancer recurrence in men with biochemical progression after radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP).

Authors:  Valeria Panebianco; Alessandro Sciarra; Danilo Lisi; Francesca Galati; Valeria Buonocore; Carlo Catalano; Vincenzo Gentile; Andrea Laghi; Roberto Passariello
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2011-02-17       Impact factor: 3.528

7.  Three-phase 18F-fluorocholine PET/CT in the evaluation of prostate cancer recurrence.

Authors:  Ch Steiner; H Vees; H Zaidi; M Wissmeyer; O Berrebi; M P Kossovsky; H G Khan; R Miralbell; O Ratib; F Buchegger
Journal:  Nuklearmedizin       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 1.379

8.  The detection rate of [11C]choline-PET/CT depends on the serum PSA-value in patients with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer.

Authors:  B J Krause; M Souvatzoglou; M Tuncel; K Herrmann; A K Buck; C Praus; T Schuster; H Geinitz; U Treiber; M Schwaiger
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2007-09-22       Impact factor: 9.236

9.  Operational characteristics of (11)c-choline positron emission tomography/computerized tomography for prostate cancer with biochemical recurrence after initial treatment.

Authors:  Christopher R Mitchell; Val J Lowe; Laureano J Rangel; Joseph C Hung; Eugene D Kwon; R Jeffrey Karnes
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2012-10-30       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Validation of increasing prostate specific antigen as a predictor of prostate cancer death after treatment of localized prostate cancer with surgery or radiation.

Authors:  Peter C Albertsen; James A Hanley; David F Penson; Judith Fine
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  3 in total

1.  Diagnostic value of retrospectively fused 64CuCl2 PET/MRI in biochemical relapse of prostate cancer: comparison with fused 18F-Choline PET/MRI, 64CuCl2 PET/CT, 18F-Choline PET/CT, and mpMRI.

Authors:  Francesco Paparo; Alice Peirano; João Matos; Lorenzo Bacigalupo; Umberto Rossi; Ilaria Mussetto; Gianluca Bottoni; Martina Ugolini; Carlo Introini; Filippo Grillo Ruggieri; Gian Andrea Rollandi; Arnoldo Piccardo
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2020-11

2.  Prospective Evaluation of 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT in Detection of High-Risk Localized Prostate Cancer: Comparison With mpMRI.

Authors:  Sonia Gaur; Esther Mena; Stephanie A Harmon; Maria L Lindenberg; Stephen Adler; Anita T Ton; Joanna H Shih; Sherif Mehralivand; Maria J Merino; Bradford J Wood; Peter A Pinto; Ronnie C Mease; Martin G Pomper; Peter L Choyke; Baris Turkbey
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 3.  PET/MRI in prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Laura Evangelista; Fabio Zattoni; Gianluca Cassarino; Paolo Artioli; Diego Cecchin; Fabrizio Dal Moro; Pietro Zucchetta
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2020-09-08       Impact factor: 9.236

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.