Giampiero Giovacchini1, Priscilla Guglielmo2,3, Paola Mapelli3,4, Elena Incerti3, Ana Maria Samanes Gajate3, Elisabetta Giovannini1, Mattia Riondato1, Alberto Briganti4,5, Luigi Gianolli3, Andrea Ciarmiello1, Maria Picchio6,7. 1. Department of Nuclear Medicine, S. Andrea Hospital, La Spezia, Italy. 2. University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy. 3. Department of Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy. 4. Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy. 5. Department of Urology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy. 6. Department of Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy. picchio.maria@unisr.it. 7. Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy. picchio.maria@unisr.it.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The main drawback of 11C-choline PET/CT for restaging prostate cancer (PCa) patients with biochemical failure is the relatively low positive detection rate for prostate specific antigen (PSA) < 1 ng/ml. This study assessed whether 11C-choline PET/CT predicts survival in PCa patients with PSA < 1 ng/ml. METHODS: This retrospective study included 210 PCa patients treated with radical prostatectomy who underwent 11C-choline PET/CT from December 1, 2004 to July 31, 2007 due to biochemical failure. PCa-specific survival was estimated using Kaplan-Meier curves. Cox regression analysis was used to evaluate the association between clinicopathologic variables and PCa-specific survival. PCa-specific survival was computed as the interval from radical prostatectomy to PCa-specific death. RESULTS: Median follow-up after radical prostatectomy was 6.9 years (95% confidence interval, CI, 2.0-14.5 years). 11C-choline PET/CT was positive in 20.5% of patients. Median PCa-specific survival was 13.4 years (95% CI, 9.9-16.8 years) in patients with positive 11C-choline PET/CT, and it was not achieved in patients with negative 11C-choline PET/CT (log-rank, chi-square = 15.0, P < 0.001). Ten-year survival probabilities for patients with negative 11C-choline PET/CT and for patients with positive 11C-choline PET/CT were 86.0% (95% CI: 80.7%-91.3%) and 63.6% (95% CI: 54.5-72.7%). At multivariate analysis, only 11C-choline PET/CT significantly predicted PCa-specific survival (hazard ratio = 2.54, 95% CI, 1.05-6.13, P = 0.038). Patients with pathological 11C-choline uptake in the prostatic bed or in pelvic lymph nodes had longer PCa-specific survival in comparison to patients with pathological tracer uptake in the skeleton (log-rank: chi-square = 27.4, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Despite the relatively low positive detection rate for PSA < 1 ng/ml, positive 11C-choline PET/CT predicts PCa-specific survival in this low PSA range. As long as more sensitive radiotracers, such as 68Ga-PSMA-11, do not become more widely available, these results might support a broader use of radiolabeled choline in restaging PCa for PSA < 1 ng/ml.
PURPOSE: The main drawback of 11C-choline PET/CT for restaging prostate cancer (PCa) patients with biochemical failure is the relatively low positive detection rate for prostate specific antigen (PSA) < 1 ng/ml. This study assessed whether 11C-choline PET/CT predicts survival in PCa patients with PSA < 1 ng/ml. METHODS: This retrospective study included 210 PCa patients treated with radical prostatectomy who underwent 11C-choline PET/CT from December 1, 2004 to July 31, 2007 due to biochemical failure. PCa-specific survival was estimated using Kaplan-Meier curves. Cox regression analysis was used to evaluate the association between clinicopathologic variables and PCa-specific survival. PCa-specific survival was computed as the interval from radical prostatectomy to PCa-specific death. RESULTS: Median follow-up after radical prostatectomy was 6.9 years (95% confidence interval, CI, 2.0-14.5 years). 11C-choline PET/CT was positive in 20.5% of patients. Median PCa-specific survival was 13.4 years (95% CI, 9.9-16.8 years) in patients with positive 11C-choline PET/CT, and it was not achieved in patients with negative 11C-choline PET/CT (log-rank, chi-square = 15.0, P < 0.001). Ten-year survival probabilities for patients with negative 11C-choline PET/CT and for patients with positive 11C-choline PET/CT were 86.0% (95% CI: 80.7%-91.3%) and 63.6% (95% CI: 54.5-72.7%). At multivariate analysis, only 11C-choline PET/CT significantly predicted PCa-specific survival (hazard ratio = 2.54, 95% CI, 1.05-6.13, P = 0.038). Patients with pathological 11C-choline uptake in the prostatic bed or in pelvic lymph nodes had longer PCa-specific survival in comparison to patients with pathological tracer uptake in the skeleton (log-rank: chi-square = 27.4, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Despite the relatively low positive detection rate for PSA < 1 ng/ml, positive 11C-choline PET/CT predicts PCa-specific survival in this low PSA range. As long as more sensitive radiotracers, such as 68Ga-PSMA-11, do not become more widely available, these results might support a broader use of radiolabeled choline in restaging PCa for PSA < 1 ng/ml.
Authors: M Picchio; C Messa; C Landoni; L Gianolli; S Sironi; M Brioschi; M Matarrese; D V Matei; F De Cobelli; A Del Maschio; F Rocco; P Rigatti; F Fazio Journal: J Urol Date: 2003-04 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Ping Zhou; Ming-Hui Chen; David McLeod; Peter R Carroll; Judd W Moul; Anthony V D'Amico Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2005-10-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Stephen J Freedland; Elizabeth B Humphreys; Leslie A Mangold; Mario Eisenberger; Frederick J Dorey; Patrick C Walsh; Alan W Partin Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2007-05-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: B J Krause; M Souvatzoglou; M Tuncel; K Herrmann; A K Buck; C Praus; T Schuster; H Geinitz; U Treiber; M Schwaiger Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2007-09-22 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Hansjörg Vees; Franz Buchegger; Susanne Albrecht; Haleem Khan; Daniela Husarik; Habib Zaidi; Dmitri Soloviev; Thomas F Hany; Raymond Miralbell Journal: BJU Int Date: 2007-04-08 Impact factor: 5.588
Authors: Lino M Sawicki; Julian Kirchner; Carolin Buddensieck; Christina Antke; Tim Ullrich; Lars Schimmöller; Johannes Boos; Christoph Schleich; Benedikt M Schaarschmidt; Christian Buchbender; Philipp Heusch; Robert Rabenalt; Peter Albers; Gerald Antoch; Hans-Wilhelm Müller; Hubertus Hautzel Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2019-03-16 Impact factor: 9.236