Literature DB >> 23161343

Impact of a multidisciplinary standardized clinical pathway on perioperative outcomes in patients with oesophageal cancer.

S R Preston1, S R Markar, C R Baker, Y Soon, S Singh, D E Low.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Defined clinical pathways can contribute to improved outcomes in patients undergoing oesophageal cancer surgery. A standardized oesophagectomy clinical pathway (SOCP) established at the Virginia Mason Medical Center (VMMC) in Seattle, Washington, USA was introduced into the Royal Surrey County Hospital (RSCH), Guildford, UK in 2011. The aim of this study was to see whether transfer and implementation of an oesophagectomy care pathway could change postoperative outcomes significantly.
METHODS: Three consecutively accrued study groups were examined at the RSCH: patients operated on immediately before the introduction of the SOCP (group 1), patients operated on after the introduction of the SOCP but not included in the pathway (group 2), and patients managed according to the SOCP (group 3). Outcomes were compared with those of patients who had surgery at the VMMC between 2009 and 2011 using the SOCP (group 4).
RESULTS: There were 12 patients in each of the first three groups and 74 in group 4. All groups were similar with respect to body mass index, medical co-morbidities and clinical stage. The median age of patients in group 3 was significantly lower than that in group 1, and median American Society of Anesthesiologists score was significantly better in group 3 compared with group 4. Following initiation of the SOCP there was an increase in immediate extubation (8 of 12 in group 1 versus 12 of 12 in group 3) and first-day mobilization (1 of 12 versus 12 of 12 respectively), and a reduction in complications (9 of 12 versus 4 of 12), length of critical care stay (4 (range 2-20) days in group 1 versus 3 (1-5) days in group 3) and length of hospital stay (17 (12-30) to 7 (6-37) days respectively). Patients not on the pathway but who had surgery during the same interval experienced small but non-significant improvements in length of critical care and hospital stay, and in first-day mobilization.
CONCLUSION: The study demonstrated improvement in short-term outcomes after oesophagectomy following the adoption of an established multidisciplinary standardized postoperative pathway.
Copyright © 2012 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23161343     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.8974

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  24 in total

Review 1.  Quality Management and Key Performance Indicators in Oncologic Esophageal Surgery.

Authors:  Ines Gockel; Constantin Johannes Ahlbrand; Michael Arras; Elke Maria Schreiber; Hauke Lang
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Acute outcomes after introduction of a standardized clinical assessment and management plan (SCAMP) for balloon aortic valvuloplasty in congenital aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Diego Porras; David W Brown; Rahul Rathod; Kevin Friedman; Kimberly Gauvreau; James E Lock; Jesse J Esch; Lisa Bergersen; Audrey C Marshall
Journal:  Congenit Heart Dis       Date:  2013-10-15       Impact factor: 2.007

3.  Comparison of "Nil by Mouth" Versus Early Oral Intake in Three Different Diet Regimens Following Esophagectomy.

Authors:  Kristine Elisabeth Eberhard; Michael Patrick Achiam; Hans Christian Rolff; Mohamed Belmouhand; Lars Bo Svendsen; Morten Thorsteinsson
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 4.  [Impact of perioperative nutritional therapy on risk and complication management in patients undergoing esophagectomy for cancer].

Authors:  A Weimann; I Gockel; A H Hölscher; H-J Meyer
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 0.955

5.  An investigation into the nutritional status of patients receiving an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol versus standard care following Oesophagectomy.

Authors:  Katie Benton; Iain Thomson; Elisabeth Isenring; B Mark Smithers; Ekta Agarwal
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 6.  Regionalization of esophagectomy: where are we now?

Authors:  James M Clark; Daniel J Boffa; Robert A Meguid; Lisa M Brown; David T Cooke
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 2.895

7.  A Novel Technique of Paravertebral Thoracic and Preperitoneal Analgesia Enhances Early Recovery After Oesophagectomy.

Authors:  Stephanie Phillips; Jasmina Dedic-Hagan; d'Arcy Ferris Baxter; H Van der Wall; G L Falk
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Evolution of standardized clinical pathways: refining multidisciplinary care and process to improve outcomes of the surgical treatment of esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Sheraz R Markar; Henner Schmidt; Sonia Kunz; Artur Bodnar; Michal Hubka; Donald E Low
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  [Standard operating procedures (SOPs) for palliative care : Presence and relevance of palliative SOPs within the network of German Comprehensive Cancer Centers (CCCs) funded by the German Cancer Aid].

Authors:  P Stachura; J Berendt; S Stiel; U S Schuler; C Ostgathe
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 1.107

10.  'Am I really ready to go home?': a qualitative study of patients' experience of early discharge following an enhanced recovery programme for liver resection surgery.

Authors:  T Vandrevala; V Senior; L Spring; L Kelliher; C Jones
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2016-03-19       Impact factor: 3.603

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.