Literature DB >> 23161160

Effects of speeding up or slowing down animate or inanimate motions on timing.

Mauro Carrozzo1, Francesco Lacquaniti.   

Abstract

It has recently been suggested that time perception and motor timing are influenced by the presence of biological movements and animacy in the visual scene. Here, we investigated the interactions among timing, speed and animacy in two experiments. In Experiment 1, observers had to press a button in synchrony with the landing of a falling ball while a dancer or a whirligig moved in the background of the scene. The speed of these two characters was artificially changed across sessions. We found striking differences in the timing of button-press responses as a function of the condition. Responses were delayed considerably with increasing speed of the whirligig. By contrast, the effect of the dancer's speed was weaker and in the opposite direction. In Experiment 2, we assessed the perceived animacy of these characters and found that the dancer was rated as much more animate than the whirligig, irrespective of the character speed. The results are consistent with the hypothesis that event timers are selectively biased as a function of perceived animacy, implicating high-level mechanisms for time modulation. However, response timing interacts with perceived animacy and speed in a complex manner.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23161160     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-012-3338-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  24 in total

Review 1.  The neural basis of temporal processing.

Authors:  Michael D Mauk; Dean V Buonomano
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 12.449

2.  Life motion signals lengthen perceived temporal duration.

Authors:  Li Wang; Yi Jiang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-01-03       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Observing human movements helps decoding environmental forces.

Authors:  Myrka Zago; Barbara La Scaleia; William L Miller; Francesco Lacquaniti
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-09-27       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Differential changes in human perception of speed due to motion adaptation.

Authors:  Markus A Hietanen; Nathan A Crowder; Michael R Ibbotson
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2008-08-11       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  The time to passage of biological and complex motion.

Authors:  Sandra Mouta; Jorge A Santos; Joan López-Moliner
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-02-27       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Prediction in joint action: what, when, and where.

Authors:  Natalie Sebanz; Guenther Knoblich
Journal:  Top Cogn Sci       Date:  2009-04

7.  A ratio model of perceived speed in the human visual system.

Authors:  Stephen T Hammett; Rebecca A Champion; Antony B Morland; Peter G Thompson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-11-22       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Temporal discrimination and the indifference interval. Implications for a model of the "internal clock".

Authors:  M Treisman
Journal:  Psychol Monogr       Date:  1963

9.  Automatic versus voluntary motor imitation: effect of visual context and stimulus velocity.

Authors:  Ambra Bisio; Natale Stucchi; Marco Jacono; Luciano Fadiga; Thierry Pozzo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-10-20       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Time and the brain: how subjective time relates to neural time.

Authors:  David M Eagleman; Peter U Tse; Dean Buonomano; Peter Janssen; Anna Christina Nobre; Alex O Holcombe
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-11-09       Impact factor: 6.709

View more
  7 in total

1.  Time perception during apparent biological motion reflects subjective speed of movement, not objective rate of visual stimulation.

Authors:  Guido Orgs; Louise Kirsch; Patrick Haggard
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Differences in perceived durations between plausible biological and non-biological stimuli.

Authors:  Giuliana Martinatti Giorjiani; Claudinei Eduardo Biazoli; Marcelo Salvador Caetano
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Temporal frequency of events rather than speed dilates perceived duration of moving objects.

Authors:  Daniel Linares; Andrei Gorea
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-03-06       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Synchronization, Attention and Transformation: Multidimensional Exploration of the Aesthetic Experience of Contemporary Dance Spectators.

Authors:  Coline Joufflineau; Coralie Vincent; Asaf Bachrach
Journal:  Behav Sci (Basel)       Date:  2018-02-10

5.  Duration estimates within a modality are integrated sub-optimally.

Authors:  Ming Bo Cai; David M Eagleman
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-08-12

Review 6.  How long did it last? You would better ask a human.

Authors:  Francesco Lacquaniti; Mauro Carrozzo; Andrea d'Avella; Barbara La Scaleia; Alessandro Moscatelli; Myrka Zago
Journal:  Front Neurorobot       Date:  2014-01-27       Impact factor: 2.650

7.  Speed Biases With Real-Life Video Clips.

Authors:  Federica Rossi; Elisa Montanaro; Claudio de'Sperati
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2018-03-16
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.