OBJECTIVE: Modern multielectrode array (MEA) systems can record the neuronal activity from thousands of electrodes, but their ability to provide spatio-temporal patterns of electrical stimulation is very limited. Furthermore, the stimulus-related artifacts significantly limit the ability to record the neuronal responses to the stimulation. To address these issues, we designed a multichannel integrated circuit for a patterned MEA-based electrical stimulation and evaluated its performance in experiments with isolated mouse and rat retina. APPROACH: The Stimchip includes 64 independent stimulation channels. Each channel comprises an internal digital-to-analogue converter that can be configured as a current or voltage source. The shape of the stimulation waveform is defined independently for each channel by the real-time data stream. In addition, each channel is equipped with circuitry for reduction of the stimulus artifact. MAIN RESULTS: Using a high-density MEA stimulation/recording system, we effectively stimulated individual retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) and recorded the neuronal responses with minimal distortion, even on the stimulating electrodes. We independently stimulated a population of RGCs in rat retina, and using a complex spatio-temporal pattern of electrical stimulation pulses, we replicated visually evoked spiking activity of a subset of these cells with high fidelity. Significance. Compared with current state-of-the-art MEA systems, the Stimchip is able to stimulate neuronal cells with much more complex sequences of electrical pulses and with significantly reduced artifacts. This opens up new possibilities for studies of neuronal responses to electrical stimulation, both in the context of neuroscience research and in the development of neuroprosthetic devices.
OBJECTIVE: Modern multielectrode array (MEA) systems can record the neuronal activity from thousands of electrodes, but their ability to provide spatio-temporal patterns of electrical stimulation is very limited. Furthermore, the stimulus-related artifacts significantly limit the ability to record the neuronal responses to the stimulation. To address these issues, we designed a multichannel integrated circuit for a patterned MEA-based electrical stimulation and evaluated its performance in experiments with isolated mouse and rat retina. APPROACH: The Stimchip includes 64 independent stimulation channels. Each channel comprises an internal digital-to-analogue converter that can be configured as a current or voltage source. The shape of the stimulation waveform is defined independently for each channel by the real-time data stream. In addition, each channel is equipped with circuitry for reduction of the stimulus artifact. MAIN RESULTS: Using a high-density MEA stimulation/recording system, we effectively stimulated individual retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) and recorded the neuronal responses with minimal distortion, even on the stimulating electrodes. We independently stimulated a population of RGCs in rat retina, and using a complex spatio-temporal pattern of electrical stimulation pulses, we replicated visually evoked spiking activity of a subset of these cells with high fidelity. Significance. Compared with current state-of-the-art MEA systems, the Stimchip is able to stimulate neuronal cells with much more complex sequences of electrical pulses and with significantly reduced artifacts. This opens up new possibilities for studies of neuronal responses to electrical stimulation, both in the context of neuroscience research and in the development of neuroprosthetic devices.
Authors: Anastacia Anishchenko; Martin Greschner; Justin Elstrott; Alexander Sher; Alan M Litke; Marla B Feller; E J Chichilnisky Journal: J Neurophysiol Date: 2010-01-27 Impact factor: 2.714
Authors: Jozsef Csicsvari; Darrell A Henze; Brian Jamieson; Kenneth D Harris; Anton Sirota; Péter Barthó; Kensall D Wise; György Buzsáki Journal: J Neurophysiol Date: 2003-08 Impact factor: 2.714
Authors: Greg D Field; Jeffrey L Gauthier; Alexander Sher; Martin Greschner; Timothy A Machado; Lauren H Jepson; Jonathon Shlens; Deborah E Gunning; Keith Mathieson; Wladyslaw Dabrowski; Liam Paninski; Alan M Litke; E J Chichilnisky Journal: Nature Date: 2010-10-07 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Lauren E Grosberg; Karthik Ganesan; Georges A Goetz; Sasidhar S Madugula; Nandita Bhaskhar; Victoria Fan; Peter Li; Pawel Hottowy; Wladyslaw Dabrowski; Alexander Sher; Alan M Litke; Subhasish Mitra; E J Chichilnisky Journal: J Neurophysiol Date: 2017-05-31 Impact factor: 2.714
Authors: Lauren H Jepson; Paweł Hottowy; Keith Mathieson; Deborah E Gunning; Władysław Dąbrowski; Alan M Litke; E J Chichilnisky Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2014-04-02 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: Victoria H Fan; Lauren E Grosberg; Sasidhar S Madugula; Pawel Hottowy; Wladyslaw Dabrowski; Alexander Sher; Alan M Litke; E J Chichilnisky Journal: J Neural Eng Date: 2018-11-07 Impact factor: 5.379
Authors: Lauren H Jepson; Pawel Hottowy; Keith Mathieson; Deborah E Gunning; Wladyslaw Dabrowski; Alan M Litke; E J Chichilnisky Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2013-04-24 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: Lauren H Jepson; Pawel Hottowy; Geoffrey A Weiner; Władysław Dabrowski; Alan M Litke; E J Chichilnisky Journal: Neuron Date: 2014-06-05 Impact factor: 17.173
Authors: Amir Shadmani; Vijay Viswam; Yihui Chen; Raziyeh Bounik; Jelena Dragas; Milos Radivojevic; Sydney Geissler; Sergey Sitnikov; Jan Muller; Andreas Hierlemann Journal: IEEE Trans Biomed Eng Date: 2019-01-01 Impact factor: 4.538
Authors: Paweł Jurgielewicz; Tomasz Fiutowski; Ewa Kublik; Andrzej Skoczeń; Małgorzata Szypulska; Piotr Wiącek; Paweł Hottowy; Bartosz Mindur Journal: Sensors (Basel) Date: 2021-06-28 Impact factor: 3.576
Authors: Felix Franke; David Jäckel; Jelena Dragas; Jan Müller; Milos Radivojevic; Douglas Bakkum; Andreas Hierlemann Journal: Front Neural Circuits Date: 2012-12-20 Impact factor: 3.492