Literature DB >> 9028812

Stress and genetic testing for disease risk.

A Baum1, A L Friedman, S G Zakowski.   

Abstract

Healthy people who believe they are at risk for a life-threatening disease appear to carry a substantial stress burden because of threat of disease and uncertainty of risk. Testing for risk factors may be helpful by reducing this uncertainty, but diseases with multiple causes, like breast cancer, appear to be determined by genetic factors and by age, reproductive behavior, exposure to environmental toxins, or unknown antecedents. For diseases caused by inherited genetic defects, testing brings different benefits and stressors. A model is proposed that predicts long-term distress when risk analysis suggests a very high risk, when uncertainty is not reduced, when results of testing are at odds with preventive actions already taken, and when people who receive a positive, risk-increasing result lack strong social support, coping skills, other psychosocial resources, or all of these.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9028812     DOI: 10.1037//0278-6133.16.1.8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Psychol        ISSN: 0278-6133            Impact factor:   4.267


  38 in total

1.  To test or not to test? Moderators of the relationship between risk perceptions and interest in predictive genetic testing.

Authors:  Shoshana Shiloh; Shiri Ilan
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2005-09-30

2.  Development and validation of an instrument to measure the impact of genetic testing on self-concept in Lynch syndrome.

Authors:  M J Esplen; N Stuckless; S Gallinger; M Aronson; H Rothenmund; K Semotiuk; J Stokes; C Way; J Green; K Butler; H V Petersen; J Wong
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2011-10-03       Impact factor: 4.438

Review 3.  Women's health comes of age.

Authors:  D E Stewart
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1997-12-15       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Genetic Counseling-Stress, Coping, and the Empowerment Perspective.

Authors:  A McConkie-Rosell; J A Sullivan
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Genetic Testing Considerations in Breast Cancer Patients.

Authors:  L France; J Gray; G Elwyn; M Tischkowitz; K Brain; J Sampson; C Anglim; A Clarke; E Parsons; H Sweetland; R Mansel; P Barrett-Lee; P Harper
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 6.  Genetic counseling for isolated GnRH deficiency.

Authors:  Margaret G Au; William F Crowley; Cassandra L Buck
Journal:  Mol Cell Endocrinol       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 4.102

7.  How can psychological science inform research about genetic counseling for clinical genomic sequencing?

Authors:  Cynthia M Khan; Christine Rini; Barbara A Bernhardt; J Scott Roberts; Kurt D Christensen; James P Evans; Kyle B Brothers; Myra I Roche; Jonathan S Berg; Gail E Henderson
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  Distress among women receiving uninformative BRCA1/2 results: 12-month outcomes.

Authors:  Suzanne C O'Neill; Christine Rini; Rachel E Goldsmith; Heiddis Valdimarsdottir; Lawrence H Cohen; Marc D Schwartz
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.894

9.  Biopsychological stress factors in BRCA mutation carriers.

Authors:  Lari Wenzel; Kathyrn Osann; Jenny Lester; Raluca Kurz; Susie Hsieh; Edward L Nelson; Beth Karlan
Journal:  Psychosomatics       Date:  2012 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.386

10.  The FAP self-concept scale (adult form).

Authors:  Mary Jane Esplen; Noreen Stuckless; Terri Berk; Kate Butler; Steve Gallinger
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2008-08-13       Impact factor: 2.375

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.