Literature DB >> 15937976

Psychological impact of genetic testing for cancer susceptibility: an update of the literature.

Bettina Meiser1.   

Abstract

This article presents an overview of the rapidly evolving body of literature on the psychological impact of genetic testing for hereditary breast/ovarian cancer susceptibility, hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) and familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). Uptake of genetic testing for BRCA1/2 and HNPCC-related mutations is more consistently related to psychological factors, rather than sociodemographic variables. Most studies on the psychological impact of genetic testing amongst individuals who have never been affected by cancer demonstrate that non-carriers derive significant psychological benefits from genetic testing, while no adverse effects have been observed amongst carriers. These benefits are more clear-cut for HNPCC, compared to hereditary breast/ovarian cancer, reflecting differences in risk management options. The few studies available on individuals affected with cancer indicate that the impact of genetic testing is mediated and amplified by their former experience of cancer. Future directions and challenges of research in this area are reviewed. In particular, more empirical data are needed on the broader impact of genetic testing on those with inconclusive results or results of uncertain significance. As genetic testing is becoming available for other types of familial cancer, additional investigations will be needed as there is evidence to suggest that the impact of genetic testing may be unique to each type of familial cancer. Copyright (c) 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15937976     DOI: 10.1002/pon.933

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychooncology        ISSN: 1057-9249            Impact factor:   3.894


  103 in total

Review 1.  Specific psychosocial issues of individuals undergoing genetic counseling for cancer - a literature review.

Authors:  Willem Eijzenga; Daniela E E Hahn; Neil K Aaronson; Irma Kluijt; Eveline M A Bleiker
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-08-31       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 2.  How risk is perceived, constructed and interpreted by clients in clinical genetics, and the effects on decision making: systematic review.

Authors:  Stephanie Sivell; Glyn Elwyn; Clara L Gaff; Angus J Clarke; Rachel Iredale; Chris Shaw; Joanna Dundon; Hazel Thornton; Adrian Edwards
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-10-30       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Results of an intervention for individuals and families with BRCA mutations: a model for providing medical updates and psychosocial support following genetic testing.

Authors:  Wendy McKinnon; Shelly Naud; Taka Ashikaga; Rose Colletti; Marie Wood
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-06-27       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 4.  Factors influencing intrafamilial communication of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer genetic information.

Authors:  Gillian Nycum; Denise Avard; Bartha M Knoppers
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2009-03-25       Impact factor: 4.246

5.  Balancing life with an increased risk of cancer: lived experiences in healthy individuals with Lynch syndrome.

Authors:  Helle Vendel Petersen; Mef Nilbert; Inge Bernstein; Christina Carlsson
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 6.  Cancers related to genetic mutations: important psychosocial issues for Canadian family physicians.

Authors:  Tara E Power; John Robinson
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.275

7.  Talking to children about maternal BRCA1/2 genetic test results: a qualitative study of parental perceptions and advice.

Authors:  Andrea Farkas Patenaude; Tiffani A DeMarco; Beth N Peshkin; Heiddis Valdimarsdottir; Judy E Garber; Katherine A Schneider; Larissa Hewitt; Jennifer Hamilton; Kenneth P Tercyak
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  BRCA mutation-negative women from hereditary breast and ovarian cancer families: a qualitative study of the BRCA-negative experience.

Authors:  Alexis D Bakos; Sadie P Hutson; Jennifer T Loud; June A Peters; Ruthann M Giusti; Mark H Greene
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.377

9.  Women's perceptions of the personal and family impact of genetic cancer risk assessment: focus group findings.

Authors:  Deborah J MacDonald; Linda Sarna; Jeffrey N Weitzel; Betty Ferrell
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 2.537

10.  Predictors of cancer worry in unaffected women from high risk breast cancer families: risk perception is not the primary issue.

Authors:  Melanie Anne Price; Phyllis Noami Butow; Sing Kai Lo; Judy Wilson
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-09-09       Impact factor: 2.537

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.