Literature DB >> 23154145

Why do singletons conceived after assisted reproduction technology have adverse perinatal outcome? Systematic review and meta-analysis.

A Pinborg1, U B Wennerholm, L B Romundstad, A Loft, K Aittomaki, V Söderström-Anttila, K G Nygren, J Hazekamp, C Bergh.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Assisted reproduction technology (ART) is used worldwide, at increasing rates, and data show that some adverse outcomes occur more frequently than following spontaneous conception (SC). Possible explanatory factors for the well-known adverse perinatal outcome in ART singletons were evaluated.
METHODS: PubMed and Cochrane databases from 1982 to 2012 were searched. Studies using donor or frozen oocytes were excluded, as well as those with no control group or including <100 children. The main outcome measure was preterm birth (PTB defined as delivery <37 weeks of gestation), and a random effects model was used for meta-analyses of PTB. Other outcomes were very PTB, low-birthweight (LBW), very LBW, small for gestational age and perinatal mortality.
RESULTS: The search returned 1255 articles and 65 of these met the inclusion criteria. The following were identified as predictors for PTB in singletons: SC in couples with time to pregnancy (TTP) > 1 year versus SC singletons in couples with TTP ≤ 1 year [adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 1.35, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.22, 1.50]; IVF/ICSI versus SC singletons from subfertile couples (TTP > 1 year; AOR 1.55, 95% CI 1.30, 1.85); conception after ovulation induction and/or intrauterine insemination versus SC singletons where TTP ≤ 1 year (AOR 1.45, 95% CI 1.21, 1.74); IVF/ICSI singletons versus their non-ART singleton siblings (AOR 1.27, 95% CI 1.08, 1.49). The risk of PTB in singletons with a 'vanishing co-twin' versus from a single gestation was AOR of 1.73 (95% CI 1.54, 1.94) in the narrative data. ICSI versus IVF (AOR 0.80, 95% CI 0.69-0.93), and frozen embryo transfer versus fresh embryo transfer (AOR 0.85, 95% CI 0.76, 0.94) were associated with a lower risk of PTB.
CONCLUSIONS: Subfertility is a major risk factor for adverse perinatal outcome in ART singletons, however, even in the same mother an ART singleton has a poorer outcome than the non-ART sibling; hence, factors related to the hormone stimulation and/or IVF methods per se also may play a part. Further research is required into mechanisms of epigenetic modification in human embryos and the effects of cryopreservation on this, whether milder ovarian stimulation regimens can improve embryo quality and endometrial conditions, and whether longer culture times for embryos has a negative influence on the perinatal outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23154145     DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dms044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod Update        ISSN: 1355-4786            Impact factor:   15.610


  147 in total

1.  Agonist depot versus OCP programming of frozen embryo transfer: a retrospective analysis of freeze-all cycles.

Authors:  Kemal Ozgur; Murat Berkkanoglu; Hasan Bulut; Peter Humaidan; Kevin Coetzee
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Pregnancy, birth, and infant outcomes by maternal fertility status: the Massachusetts Outcomes Study of Assisted Reproductive Technology.

Authors:  Barbara Luke; Daksha Gopal; Howard Cabral; Judy E Stern; Hafsatou Diop
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-04-08       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Perinatal outcomes associated with assisted reproductive technology: the Massachusetts Outcomes Study of Assisted Reproductive Technologies (MOSART).

Authors:  Eugene Declercq; Barbara Luke; Candice Belanoff; Howard Cabral; Hafsatou Diop; Daksha Gopal; Lan Hoang; Milton Kotelchuck; Judy E Stern; Mark D Hornstein
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2015-02-05       Impact factor: 7.329

4.  Superovulation alters the expression of endometrial genes critical to tissue remodeling and placentation.

Authors:  Suneeta Senapati; Fan Wang; Teri Ord; Christos Coutifaris; Rui Feng; Monica Mainigi
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Natural cycle IVF reduces the risk of low birthweight infants compared with conventional stimulated IVF.

Authors:  Winifred Mak; Laxmi A Kondapalli; Gerard Celia; John Gordon; Michael DiMattina; Mark Payson
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 6.918

6.  Assisted Reproductive Technology and Early Intervention Program Enrollment.

Authors:  Hafsatou Diop; Daksha Gopal; Howard Cabral; Candice Belanoff; Eugene R Declercq; Milton Kotelchuck; Barbara Luke; Judy E Stern
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 7.124

7.  Public health implications of a North American publicly funded in vitro fertilization program; lessons to learn.

Authors:  Talya Shaulov; Serge Belisle; Michael H Dahan
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 3.412

8.  Fresh and Frozen-Thawed Embryo Transfer Compared to Natural Conception: Differences in Perinatal Outcome.

Authors:  Suzanne Spijkers; Jan Willem Lens; Roel Schats; Cornelis B Lambalk
Journal:  Gynecol Obstet Invest       Date:  2017-05-13       Impact factor: 2.031

9.  Effect of embryo and blastocyst transfer on the birthweight of live-born singletons from FET cycles.

Authors:  Junshun Fang; Lihua Zhu; Dong Li; Zhipeng Xu; Guijun Yan; Haixiang Sun; Ningyuan Zhang; Linjun Chen
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 3.412

10.  Etiology of Hypomineralized Second Primary Molars: A Prospective Twin Study.

Authors:  M J Silva; N M Kilpatrick; J M Craig; D J Manton; P Leong; D Burgner; K J Scurrah
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2018-08-03       Impact factor: 6.116

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.