Literature DB >> 23152550

Comparison of broth enhancement to direct plating for screening of rectal cultures for ciprofloxacin-resistant Escherichia coli.

Michael A Liss1, Kristen K Nakamura, Ellena M Peterson.   

Abstract

A transrectal prostate biopsy is the most common procedure used to establish the diagnosis of prostate cancer. Prior to biopsy, patients are commonly given ciprofloxacin for prophylaxis. However, a complication of the procedure is infection with ciprofloxacin-resistant organisms, in particular resistant Escherichia coli. In order to identify patients carrying ciprofloxacin-resistant E. coli, so as to tailor their antibiotic prophylaxis, rectal swabs are screened using selective broth and/or solid medium. In our evaluation, we compared broth enrichment and direct plating techniques by using brain heart infusion broth and MacConkey agar containing 1 μg/ml or 10 μg/ml of ciprofloxacin. Of the 100 patients included in the study, 20 were colonized with ciprofloxacin-resistant organisms, 19 of which were E. coli. There was no significant difference (P > 0.1) between the culture methods or the ciprofloxacin concentrations in the medium when identifying patients with ciprofloxacin-resistant E. coli; however, broth enrichment using 1 μg/ml ciprofloxacin was the most sensitive at 100%, but it was the least specific. Direct plating of rectal swabs onto MacConkey agar containing 10 μg/ml of ciprofloxacin was 100% specific and missed only 1 positive specimen, with a sensitivity of 94.7%; this method was the most cost-effective. Therefore, direct plating of rectal swabs onto selective medium proved to be a sensitive and cost-effective approach in identifying patients colonized with ciprofloxacin-resistant E. coli.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23152550      PMCID: PMC3536248          DOI: 10.1128/JCM.02158-12

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  13 in total

1.  Fluoroquinolone-resistant E. coli in intestinal flora of patients undergoing transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy--should we reassess our practices for antibiotic prophylaxis?

Authors:  D Steensels; K Slabbaert; L De Wever; P Vermeersch; H Van Poppel; J Verhaegen
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2011-09-29       Impact factor: 8.067

2.  Best practice policy statement on urologic surgery antimicrobial prophylaxis.

Authors:  J Stuart Wolf; Carol J Bennett; Roger R Dmochowski; Brent K Hollenbeck; Margaret S Pearle; Anthony J Schaeffer
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Prevalence of antimicrobial resistance in intestinal flora of patients undergoing prostatic biopsy: implications for prophylaxis and treatment of infections after biopsy.

Authors:  Deepak Batura; G Gopal Rao; Peder Bo Nielsen
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2010-03-16       Impact factor: 5.588

4.  Complications after prostate biopsy: data from SEER-Medicare.

Authors:  Stacy Loeb; H Ballentine Carter; Sonja I Berndt; Winnie Ricker; Edward M Schaeffer
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Rectal cultures before transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy reduce post-prostatic biopsy infection rates.

Authors:  Christopher A Duplessis; Mary Bavaro; Mark P Simons; Charles Marguet; Michael Santomauro; Brian Auge; Daniel A Collard; Joshua Fierer; James Lesperance
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.649

6.  Detection of fluoroquinolone-resistant organisms from rectal swabs by use of selective media prior to a transrectal prostate biopsy.

Authors:  Michael A Liss; Amy N Peeples; Ellena M Peterson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2010-12-22       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Prevalence of fluoroquinolone-resistant Escherichia coli before and incidence of acute bacterial prostatitis after prostate biopsy.

Authors:  Satoru Minamida; Takefumi Satoh; Kenichi Tabata; Masaki Kimura; Hideyasu Tsumura; Shinji Kurosaka; Kazumasa Matsumoto; Tetsuo Fujita; Masatsugu Iwamura; Shiro Baba
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2011-09-10       Impact factor: 2.649

8.  Antibiotic prophylaxis for transrectal needle biopsy of the prostate: a randomized controlled study.

Authors:  M Aron; T P Rajeev; N P Gupta
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 5.588

9.  Increasing hospital admission rates for urological complications after transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy.

Authors:  Robert K Nam; Refik Saskin; Yuna Lee; Ying Liu; Calvin Law; Laurence H Klotz; D Andrew Loblaw; John Trachtenberg; Aleksandra Stanimirovic; Andrew E Simor; Arun Seth; David R Urbach; Steven A Narod
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2010-01-20       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  The incidence of fluoroquinolone resistant infections after prostate biopsy--are fluoroquinolones still effective prophylaxis?

Authors:  Joseph Feliciano; Ervin Teper; Michael Ferrandino; Richard J Macchia; William Blank; Ivan Grunberger; Ivan Colon
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-01-22       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  6 in total

1.  An antimicrobial prophylaxis protocol using rectal swab cultures for transrectal prostate biopsy.

Authors:  Stephen J Summers; Darshan P Patel; Blake D Hamilton; Angela P Presson; Mark A Fisher; William T Lowrance; Andrew W Southwick
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-05-03       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Screening rectal culture to identify fluoroquinolone-resistant organisms before transrectal prostate biopsy: do the culture results between office visit and biopsy correlate?

Authors:  Michael A Liss; Kristen K Nakamura; Rachel Meuleners; Surendra B Kolla; Atreya Dash; Ellena M Peterson
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 3.  Cutting to the Core of the Issue: Emerging Strategies To Reduce Prostate Biopsy-Related Infections.

Authors:  Robin R Chamberland
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2016-05-04       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Comparison between Perianal Swab and Stool Specimens for Detecting Colonization with Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase-Producing and Fluoroquinolone-Resistant Enterobacterales.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Kubiak; Michael Hovan; Emily Davidson; Claire Douglass; Kevin Burgos; Thomas J Walsh; Lars F Westblade; Michael J Satlin
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 11.677

5.  The effectiveness of targeted relative to empiric prophylaxis on infectious complications after transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Susan Scott; Patrick N Harris; Deborah A Williamson; Michael A Liss; Suhail A R Doi; Matthew J Roberts
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-02-16       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Antimicrobial-Resistant Escherichia coli Survived in Dust Samples for More than 20 Years.

Authors:  Jochen Schulz; Inga Ruddat; Jörg Hartung; Gerd Hamscher; Nicole Kemper; Christa Ewers
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-06-10       Impact factor: 5.640

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.