Literature DB >> 20089283

Increasing hospital admission rates for urological complications after transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy.

Robert K Nam1, Refik Saskin, Yuna Lee, Ying Liu, Calvin Law, Laurence H Klotz, D Andrew Loblaw, John Trachtenberg, Aleksandra Stanimirovic, Andrew E Simor, Arun Seth, David R Urbach, Steven A Narod.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy is widely used to confirm the diagnosis of prostate cancer. The technique has been associated with significant morbidity in a small proportion of patients.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a population based study of 75,190 men who underwent a transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy in Ontario, Canada, between 1996 and 2005. We used hospital and cancer registry administrative databases to estimate the rates of hospital admission and mortality due to urological complications associated with the procedure.
RESULTS: Of the 75,190 men who underwent transrectal ultrasound biopsy 33,508 (44.6%) were diagnosed with prostate cancer and 41,682 (55.4%) did not have prostate cancer. The hospital admission rate for urological complications within 30 days of the procedure for men without cancer was 1.9% (781/41,482). The 30-day hospital admission rate increased from 1.0% in 1996 to 4.1% in 2005 (p for trend <0.0001). The majority of hospital admissions (72%) were for infection related reasons. The probability of being admitted to hospital within 30 days of having the procedure increased 4-fold between 1996 and 2005 (OR 3.7, 95% CI 2.0-7.0, p <0.0001). The overall 30-day mortality rate was 0.09% but did not change during the study period.
CONCLUSIONS: The hospital admission rates for complications following transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy have increased dramatically during the last 10 years primarily due to an increasing rate of infection related complications. 2010 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20089283     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.11.043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  114 in total

1.  [Antibiotic prophylaxis in urology].

Authors:  F M E Wagenlehner; M Grabe; K G Naber; T E Bjerklund Johansen; C K Naber; W Weidner
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  Infection: prostate biopsy-infection and prior fluoroquinolone exposure.

Authors:  Michael A Liss
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2011-10-11       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 3.  The emerging threat of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria in urology.

Authors:  Hosam M Zowawi; Patrick N A Harris; Matthew J Roberts; Paul A Tambyah; Mark A Schembri; M Diletta Pezzani; Deborah A Williamson; David L Paterson
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 14.432

4.  Validating multiparametric MRI for diagnosis and monitoring of prostate cancer in patients for active surveillance.

Authors:  Iqbal Sahibzada; Deepak Batura; Giles Hellawell
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 2.370

5.  Salvage prostatectomy post-definitive radiation therapy: The Vancouver experience.

Authors:  Niall M Corcoran; Guilherme Godoy; Rodney C Studd; Rowan G Casey; Antonio Hurtado-Coll; Scott Tyldesley; S Larry Goldenberg; Martin E Gleave
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2013 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.862

6.  Chemoprophylaxis during transrectal prostate needle biopsy: critical analysis through randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Ahmed M Elshal; Ahmed M Atwa; Ahmed R El-Nahas; Mohamed A El-Ghar; Asaad Gaber; Essam Elsawy; Abdelwahab Hashem; Yasser Farag; Hashim Farg; Ali Elsorougy; Mohamed Fouda; Hossam Nabeeh; Ahmed Mosbah
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-05-07       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  Variations in prostate biopsy practice: A quantitative questionnaire-based study.

Authors:  Matthew O Lipinski; D Robert Siemens; Patti A Groome
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2013 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.862

8.  [Infection and sepsis prevention in prostate biopsy].

Authors:  F M E Wagenlehner; A Pilatz; P Waliszewski; T Dansranjavin; W Weidner
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 0.639

9.  Five-year downstream outcomes following prostate-specific antigen screening in older men.

Authors:  Louise C Walter; Kathy Z Fung; Katharine A Kirby; Ying Shi; Roxanne Espaldon; Sarah O'Brien; Stephen J Freedland; Adam A Powell; Richard M Hoffman
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2013-05-27       Impact factor: 21.873

Review 10.  Risk stratification in prostate cancer screening.

Authors:  Monique J Roobol; Sigrid V Carlsson
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 14.432

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.