AIM: To investigate the effect of depth on cervical shear-wave elastography. METHODS: Shear-wave elastography was applied to estimate the velocity of propagation of the acoustic force impulse (shear wave) in the cervix of 154 pregnant women at 11-36 weeks of gestation. Shear-wave speed (SWS) was evaluated in cross-sectional views of the internal and external cervical os in five regions of interest: anterior, posterior, lateral right, lateral left, and endocervix. Distance from the center of the ultrasound (US) transducer to the center of each region of interest was registered. RESULTS: In all regions, SWS decreased significantly with gestational age (P=0.006). In the internal os, SWS was similar among the anterior, posterior, and lateral regions and lower in the endocervix. In the external os, the endocervix and anterior regions showed similar SWS values, lower than those from the posterior and lateral regions. In the endocervix, these differences remained significant after adjustment for depth, gestational age, and cervical length. SWS estimations in all regions of the internal os were higher than those of the external os, suggesting denser tissue. CONCLUSION: Depth from the US probe to different regions in the cervix did not significantly affect the SWS estimations.
AIM: To investigate the effect of depth on cervical shear-wave elastography. METHODS: Shear-wave elastography was applied to estimate the velocity of propagation of the acoustic force impulse (shear wave) in the cervix of 154 pregnant women at 11-36 weeks of gestation. Shear-wave speed (SWS) was evaluated in cross-sectional views of the internal and external cervical os in five regions of interest: anterior, posterior, lateral right, lateral left, and endocervix. Distance from the center of the ultrasound (US) transducer to the center of each region of interest was registered. RESULTS: In all regions, SWS decreased significantly with gestational age (P=0.006). In the internal os, SWS was similar among the anterior, posterior, and lateral regions and lower in the endocervix. In the external os, the endocervix and anterior regions showed similar SWS values, lower than those from the posterior and lateral regions. In the endocervix, these differences remained significant after adjustment for depth, gestational age, and cervical length. SWS estimations in all regions of the internal os were higher than those of the external os, suggesting denser tissue. CONCLUSION: Depth from the US probe to different regions in the cervix did not significantly affect the SWS estimations.
Authors: E Vaisbuch; R Romero; O Erez; J P Kusanovic; S Mazaki-Tovi; F Gotsch; V Romero; C Ward; T Chaiworapongsa; P Mittal; Y Sorokin; S S Hassan Journal: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol Date: 2010-10 Impact factor: 7.299
Authors: S S Hassan; R Romero; S M Berry; K Dang; S C Blackwell; M C Treadwell; H M Wolfe Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2000-06 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Mireen Friedrich-Rust; Katrin Wunder; Susanne Kriener; Fariba Sotoudeh; Swantje Richter; Joerg Bojunga; Eva Herrmann; Thierry Poynard; Christoph F Dietrich; Johannes Vermehren; Stefan Zeuzem; Christoph Sarrazin Journal: Radiology Date: 2009-08 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Lindsey C Carlson; Timothy J Hall; Ivan M Rosado-Mendez; Lu Mao; Helen Feltovich Journal: Interface Focus Date: 2019-08-16 Impact factor: 3.906
Authors: Quinton W Guerrero; Helen Feltovich; Ivan M Rosado-Mendez; Lindsey C Carlson; Geng Li; Timothy J Hall Journal: Ultrasound Med Biol Date: 2018-04-13 Impact factor: 2.998
Authors: Bin Huang; Lindsey Carlson Drehfal; Ivan M Rosado-Mendez; Quinton W Guerrero; Mark L Palmeri; Heather A Simmons; Helen Feltovich; Timothy J Hall Journal: IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control Date: 2016-02-08 Impact factor: 2.725
Authors: Lindsey C Carlson; Timothy J Hall; Ivan M Rosado-Mendez; Mark L Palmeri; Helen Feltovich Journal: Ultrasound Med Biol Date: 2017-12-12 Impact factor: 2.998